Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Not A Conspiracy Theory: Eradicating the Germans through Mass-Immigration

Not A Conspiracy Theory: Eradicating the Germans through Mass-Immigration

by Sean Jobst
26 September 2017

In my previous article, I mentioned an Israeli named Avrum Ehrlich who called for a Semitic "reconciliation" between Jews and Arabs, so that the latter can accept a permanent Jewish State in their midst and redirect all their energies towards an Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe. A special ire was expressed towards Germany, which shouldn't be a surprise to those of us with German blood who are cognizant of the true history of our people. Recently, I've learned about a precursor to the Kalergi Plan from a video by Varg Vikernes:






A precursor of the Kalergi Plan (advocating the same methods of forced mass miscegenation) was formulated by Earnest Hooton (1887-1954), an American physical anthropologist and Harvard professor. In his article "Breed War Stain Out of Germans" for the New York daily newspaper P.M. Daily on 4th January 1943, Hooton proposed the eradication of the German people through an "outbreeding" plan that would "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities." (Cited in Benjamin Colby, Twas a Famous Victory: Deception and Propaganda in War with Germany, New York: Arlington House Publishers, 1975, p. 131)

 
 



The overall plan envisioned a period of 20 years to be implemented: "The objects of this measure include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals." The German family unit would be separated, with ten to twelve million German men assigned to forced labor under strict supervision in Allied countries, where they would be encouraged to mate with non-German women and forbidden from returning to Germany.

Meanwhile, German women would be at the mercy of the occupiers, who would encourage the mass-immigration of non-German - and especially non-European - men into Germany, and enforce their mating with German women: "During the occupation we must encourage also the immigration and settlement of foreigners into the German states, especially foreign men of the third world." Hooton's blatant racism against Germans, and the ridiculousness of his ahistorical myth about a unique German propensity towards "militarism", was such that even a Canadian socialist publication opposed it:






This is no conspiracy theory, but was an actual plan formulated by one who despised Germans so that he advocated ways to wipe them out of existence as a people. Despite claims to the contrary, I could not find any evidence that Hooton was actually Jewish. All indications are that he was a non-Jew who extolled the "superior" qualities of the Jews (much like Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, who referred to the Jews as a "spiritual nobility of Europe").

This is borne out by an article published in Collier's Magazine on April 28, 1939, whereby Hooton ascribed "anti-Semitism" to Gentile jealousy of the Jews for their "high average intelligence," in terms that prove he wasn't Jewish. While advocating Jewish intermarriage (unlike Kalergi), this was mostly a one-way benefit in his eyes: The Jews were already too "superior" to benefit from Gentile blood, while Jewish blood "would confer a great genetic boon upon mankind." (Cited in "Earnest A. Hooton Offers Cure for 'Jewish Problem,'" The Harvard Crimson, April 28, 1939)






"Dr. Ernest A. Hooton, who advocates sending Czechs, Austrians and other peoples into Germany to dilute the German stock [he actually advocated non-European immigrants in his original article], says the Germans 'are all affected with the same moral imbecility in accordance with which nobody deserves any consideration and nobody gets any.' The distinction often made between 'good Germans' and 'bad Germans' is erroneous, Dr. Hooton said. 'The only good Germans are the quick and the dead. The quick got out of Germany!'" ("Hooton Calls Germans 'Moral Imbeciles'," Canadian Jewish Chronicle, October 20, 1944, p. 15)

His plan was not alone, nor were his methods. Pandering to powerful Jewish voters and financial donors, 1940 U.S. Republican presidential candidate Wendell Wilkie advocated as one of America's war aims: "Abolition of racial exclusiveness of the German people!" (Wendell Wilkie, One World, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1943, p. 85). On October 22, 1939, Lionel de Rothschild urged his close friend and Churchill's secretary, John Colville, to define England's war aim: "Divide the Germans among the other nations of the world and leave Germany to the Jews." (John Colville, Downing Street Diaries, 1939-45, Berlin: Siedler Verlag, 1988, p. 31)






All of these proposals were touted in the American mainstream media, among official circles, not fringe figures. For example, Theodore Kaufman's 1941 book Germany Must Perish! was reviewed favorably by America's leading newspapers. The Kaufman Plan proposed the mass-sterilization of Germans and the division of Germany among neighboring countries. The latter proposal was partially implemented in the east, but the sterilization was viewed as expensive and too unrealistic. However, the Morgenthau Plan of the Jewish U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., which called for the eradication of the German people through mass-starvation and the theft of their industries, was partially implemented and only shelved with the Cold War.

However, in the decades since 1945 and especially the last few years, Germany has been flooded with a massive number of immigrants, mostly Muslim and economic migrants from non-warzones (despite the official propaganda presenting them as "refugees" fleeing war). Couple this with the unfortunate reduction of the German birth rate to below the replacement level, and we see the spirit proposed by past hatemongers alive and well - and forcibly imposed upon the German people with a vengeance. Leading politicians openly call for the eradication of their own constituents, merely for being from the German people.






Gregor Gysi is a German politician of Jewish ancestry, representing the openly Marxist party Die Linke. This Bundestag member grew up the son of a senior Communist Party apparatchik in East Germany, Klaus Gysi, closely-connected with the highest levels of the DDR hierarchy. Gregor Gysi was uncovered after reunification as a long-standing Stasi informant. He has advocated for Israel, purging from his party any members of the Boycott, Divestments, Sanctions (BDS) and Gaza Flotilla movements. He also successfully prevented the speaking engagements in Germany of two American Jewish anti-Israel activists, Norman Finkelstein and Max Blumenthal.

Yet, while advocating for the foreign state of Israel, this elected German politician led a protest in favor of mass-immigration held 6th June 2015, called "Live better without Nazis - Diversity is our future", wherein he conflated "Nazis" with German people generally (presumably even his gullible Die Linke constituents), saying with an obvious smirk: "Every year more native Germans die than there are born. That is very fortunate. It's because the Nazis are not very good at having offspring. This is why we are so dependent on immigration from foreign countries."

This is the classic dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution: pursuing the policies of their own making that have led to this situation in the first place, and then slyly proposing the alleged "solution" to their own problem. These anti-Germans dismiss not only all opposition to mass-immigration as "racist and inhuman," but even the imperative to preserve one's own German people - a natural and acceptable biological desire of any other people. It is unprecedented that elected leaders of a country would openly advocate the extinction of their own people, their own constituents, their own nation - but anyone familiar with the P.C. tyranny would know this is normal in modern Germany.






On 16 November 2011, the self-hating German Social Democratic official Stefanie Drese addressed the State Parliament of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, saying to the approving claps of members of all leading anti-German parties, left/right - SPD, CDU, Die Linke and Die Grünen: "The representatives of the democratic factions, in whose name I speak today, strongly reject the NPD's motion to preserve the biological continuity of the German people. This motion is both racist and inhuman, narrow-minded and backward-looking at the same time, and once again demonstrates in a frightening way the NPD's thought and its intellectual proximity to Nazi ideology."

Let it be said: Identity is not racist, but is a normal biological desire for a people to preserve their own culture and legacy. Rather, it is the desire of self-hating enemies of the German people that IS racist and inhuman! This is also a testament against these political elites, no matter if they represent a "left" or a "right" party, they still hold the German people generally in such open and blatant contempt. But we need not be dissuaded by this enforced genetic suicide. Let us expose these Globalists and their real agenda, and match their tireless agenda with our own resilience to affirm and protect identity!


Atop Birkenkopf in Stuttgart, mit Blick auf das Land meiner Vorfahren ... Meine Inspiration, mein Impuls, meine Sache gegen die Globalisten und Zionisten.
 

Monday, September 25, 2017

Israeli pundit calls for Jewish-Muslim reconciliation, Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe

Israeli pundit calls for Jewish-Muslim reconciliation, Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe

by Sean Jobst
24 September 2017


Avrum Ehrlich


In an editorial scribbled under the messianic title "When Europe falls to the Arabs, Jerusalem will be silent" (Times of Israel, April 30, 2017), Avrum Ehrlich, an Israeli scholar known for his works on Jewish theology and a staunch advocate for the growing Israeli-Chinese alliance as executive director of the Israel-China Institute and founder of the Israel Chamber of Commerce in China, advocated joint Jewish-Muslim action against Europeans and especially Germans as collective punishment for centuries of perceived "anti-Semitism" (after all, the parallel us vs. them mentality condemns all of them generally as either "goyim" or "kuffar"):

"The implications of Jewish – Arab reconciliation on Germany in particular and Europe in general however are not so bright. The day may still come when Arab extremism ceases its misdirected aggression in the name of Allah and ISIS for a more nuanced critique of Germany and European hypocrisy demonstrated in its ill treatment of Israel. Arabs in Europe may yet say ‘you denigrated our gentle and conciliatory Jewish cousins, killed, disgraced and delegitimized them for nought [sic] and now we, more assertive, less willing sheep for slaughter and mockery, have now replaced them in your lands and we demand recompense for their spilt blood and humiliation’.

"Indeed a future is not far away when Arabs may justify their cultural domination over Europe while championing Israel and demand re appropriation for the centuries of Semitic denigration. They may yet argue that European values are bankrupt, not fit for governance or international respect, not fair or impartial as demonstrated in its record against Israel and therefore the epoch of European ascendency should come to an end."





His narrative is filled with the typical self-righteous Jewish supremacist attitude: The Jews can do no wrong in his eyes, but are merely victims of some genetic vicious "anti-Semitism" held alike by the hosts of all the countries that ultimately expelled them at one time or another in history. He used "Arab" interchangeably with Muslims, as is typical with other articles on that Israeli website. So he referred to an alliance whereby the Muslim migrants could be used against the hated Europeans. He envisioned an Islamic cultural domination over Europe as both to Israel's direct benefit and also as a manifestation of a Judaic vengeance against Europeans and Germans by proxy.

Re-educating the Migrants into Good Little Zionists

Long before the migration crisis, a leading Jewish newspaper in Germany proclaimed: "Immigration primarily is a chance for strengthening Jewish culture in Germany." (Allgemeine Jüdische Wochenzeitschrift, 28 Sept. 2000). In Globalist Sorosian parlance, this is an "open society", a phrase openly touted in a joint article by Dr. Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany - the name itself betraying how such an organization views themselves in Zionist fashion as a foreign element - and World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder.




They welcomed such an "open society" because it was "good for Jewry" and evoked the memory of the "Shoah" to continuously guilt-trip the Germans into accepting this mass-immigration. They envisioned curing the migrants of their own "Arab anti-Semitism" and "re-educating" them in the "German" values which they defined as those forced upon the German people since 1945, namely "respect for the values enshrined in the Constitution [actually 'The Basic Law'] and agreeing that support for Israel, rejection of anti-Semitism, and remembrance of the Holocaust, is part of Germany's DNA." (Josef Schuster and Ronald Lauder, "Wir Juden wissen wie bitter Flucht ist," Die Welt, 9 Sept. 2015)

In their redefinition, "Germans" are merely those living within the geographical area of Germany, regardless of race, culture, and lineage or genetic history linking them to that land. This is even while hypocrites such as Schuster and Lauder insist on representing all Jews generally, regardless of where they live. As they gloat in their article: "The Jewish community, both in Germany and worldwide, welcomes this evolution towards an open society."




This was on full display in September 2016, when Rabbi Yehuda Teichtal, Berlin Jewish community rabbi and president of the Chabad Jewish Education Center, arranged a ceremony in honor of a new Torah Scroll received by the Orthodox community at the Münstersche Street Synagogue. The Chabad rally was attended by children of the Jewish community alongside ten young Syrian refugees, joined by their families and by 150 members of the Berlin Jewish community. Following the ceremony at the synagogue, they marched along the streets of Berlin carrying the new Torah scroll. (Tamara Zieve, "Syrian refugees attend Berlin Jewish parade," Jerusalem Post, Sept. 15, 2016)

Make no mistake about this: In Chabad ideology, this is re-educating Gentiles in "Noahide laws", and such a spectacle of arrogant Judaic tribalism within the German capital, with such assertive displays of their support for changing the demographics of Germany, was carefully calculated and deliberate since symbolism is very important in the Kabbalistic ideology of Chabad. The seeds were planted for the current efforts of Ehrlich and others in such a "reconciliation" - but it requires the Arab Muslims to shed themselves of any concern for Palestinians or opposition to Zionism.





Drawing My Line in the Sand

Like many other anti-Zionist activists, I exerted much efforts against the actions of Israel and spoke out constantly in support of the Palestinians. My sympathies remain fully with the Palestinians. I will speak bluntly: We anti-Zionists of European ancestry have generally been the staunchest, most sincere in support of Palestinian rights. Especially because we've seen with the Kalergi Plan-on-steroids, many Muslim leaders and organizations have shown their willingness to jettison even the Palestinian cause when it comes to aligning fully and openly with Zionist-Jewish groups and organizations against the right of indigenous Europeans to their own cultural and demographic integrity in their own ends.

If not for Palestine, how would Jews and Muslims generally get along with each other? Or would the mass of Muslims even care about the Palestinians if the majority didn't happen to be Muslim? And, if the Palestinians were a different religion, wouldn't they fully sympathize with the colonial Jewish "People of the Book" instead of such a native "mushrik" people? The stark answer to that question is being played out on the ground in Europe, where Jewish organizations and leaders have stood at the forefront of promoting mass-immigration from mostly Muslim countries. The natural predilection for the two groups to generally align with each other is also seen by the level to which American Muslim organizations and figures have likewise raised their efforts in supporting any unfettered immigration of Muslims into Western countries, automatically opposing as "racist Islamophobes" anyone who wants to restrict such mass-immigration.






The parallels behind such slander and the age-old slander of "anti-Semitism" are too blatant, as are the open allegiance large sections - if not outright majorities - of Jews and Muslims (specifically referring to those from immigrant backgrounds and even many converts) would make to Israel and the "Umma", respectively, over the European lands that host them. (I reject generalities, but I am referring to a collective group as a group-think guided by political pressure groups, not individuals.) The arrogance such an attitude breeds is manifested in such a sentiment as Ehrlich's conclusion: "Germany be warned you are weighed in the balances and are found wanting! Europe take heed, repent or become a footnote in the history of peoples. Thus says the Lord of Hosts."

I will be blunt: Anyone who supports the mass-immigration into Europe, promoted as it is by leading Zionist-Jewish figures and organizations, are only "anti-Zionist" insofar as it comes to the Arabs and Muslims, but are willing to ally with Zionism wherever the shared target is indigenous Europeans. Although always aware of my heritage, setting foot the last two summers on my ancestral lands have awoken something deep within me as I now affirm and stand up more and more determined, against the Kalergi Plan and other anti-European agendas....just as I similarly oppose those misguided and treacherous efforts that reduce our peoples to cannon-fodder and tax-slaves for Israel's wars or to prop up the debt machine of international bankers. A line has been drawn in the sand.



"The Rape of Europa" by Titian, circa 1560-1562




"The Rape of Europa" by Sebastiano Conca, 18th-century