By Sean Jobst
24 May 2025
 |
I now take a slight detour from the previous article although still
very much related to Technocracy. Ascribing everything they do to only profits
and control, we fail to see just how insidious these Technocrats truly are - how
they have internalized their delusions and work toward them with a messianic
fervor. Logic dictates that if there is a spiritual reality animating all
things, then its opposite would motivate others – a counter-spirituality
that can only simulate what it aspires to but never can create on its own; that
perverts and inverts actual traditions into its own Techno-religion.(1)
In researching these Technocrats, we find their consistent
links with the most fanatical Zionists – those around Netanyahu, West Bank settler expansionist leaders, the Temple Institute and others seeking to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem,
and foremost the global Chabad cult. We see a deference to those circles not paid to any others, an eagerness to do business with them of
paramount importance for these Technocrats, almost as if their entire systems
depend on them. We also see an abundance of Israeli military intelligence’s
Unit 8200 members infiltrated throughout these Big Tech companies.(2) Following
various threads, I propose that the religion these Technocrats ascribe to is an
emerging Technocratic Noahidism.
Noahidism is a messianic religion, based on Gentile worship of Judaism without being able to ever become Jewish, but inseparable from the most fanatical and messianic political Zionism. “Today there are dozens of rabbis who might all be
placed along the ideological spectrum of religious Zionism participating in the
production of Noahide books, media, and online courses,” as noted by Rachel Z.
Feldman, religious studies professor at Dartmouth College, whose work is an
excellent source on Noahidism and Messianic Zionism. “While these organizations
differ in their specific legal interpretations (on, for example, varying levels
of permissibility when it comes to Noahides participating in Jewish ritual
life), they are motivated by a shared messianic and post-Zionist theocratic
vision, a political theology that views Noahides as allies in the securing of Jewish
sovereignty over the Land of Israel and the eventual rebuilding of the Temple.”(3)
Founded upon rabbinical commentaries (midrash) on the
Bible, Noahidism proposes seven universal laws it regards as mandated upon all
non-Jews. This is based on the premise that Jews are a “chosen” people who were
given 613 commandments (mitzvot) on Mount Sinai, which the rabbis spin
as a “great responsibility” in being a “light unto the nations” – the literal
meaning of goyim, or Gentiles. Four of these laws are common sense moral
guidance innate to the world’s tribal traditions long before the rabbinical
concept of “Noahide” was even invented, or Judaism itself: Not to murder,
steal, eat flesh from a living animal, or commit adultery and other sexual
immorality. Yet with Noahidism, they swindle people into associating Natural laws
and ethics that are innate to all peoples by their very Being upon this living
Earth, with the “Noahide” concept that was a much later invention of rabbis.
By far the most problematic are the other three Noahide Laws, due
to what they entail of personal sovereignty and social control. One is absolute
monotheism, prohibiting “idolatry” and the worship of “false gods”– i.e. any
deity other than the one “God of Israel”. This is obviously problematic for a Polytheist
and Animist like myself, but should also be even for other monotheistic
religions including Christians, whose view of divinity is regarded as shituf
or “associationism”. Even their definition of idolatry is expansive and
includes a wide array of simple traditions not involving worship. One rabbinical source defines “idolatry” as “the customs of the nations.” The second Noahide law is “not to curse God”
which also prohibits “blasphemy” as defined by the rabbis. A Noahide is
obligated to believe in the thirteen “dogmas of faith” as laid out by Maimonides, including in the
arrival of the Jewish messiah (moshiach). Jewish messianism is really
the cornerstone of Noahidism, with Chabad founder Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
and other proponents viewing Noahides as useful instruments in their eschatology
to “hasten” the messianic age.
Chabad cultists and other proponents of Noahidism lie by omission when they propagandize about “seven universal laws” they actually view as seven categories under which many more laws apply – some sources cite more than others. The injunction against “blasphemy” was also defined by Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, president of the Sanhedrin’s Court for the Noahides, as “Respecting the Creator and the sages who are familiar with His Torah, and respecting the places of worship where the Torah is learned and prayers are recited to him. It is forbidden, God forbid, to speak harshly against them or to curse them.” We see this with the fierce backlash conservative podcaster Candace Owens received after confronting Chabad cultist Rabbi Shmuely Boteach with Schneerson’s own supremacist writings and statements. She was predictably accused of “anti-Semitism” but the lesson is clear even for Jews opposed to Schneerson: “Criticize the late Chabad Rebbe at your peril.” Noahidism’s definition of “blasphemy” thus includes criticism of its rabbinical proponents, especially the Chabad movement and its extensive political connections. Its “blasphemous” to even “strike” a Jew (as opposed to a Gentile) because they are “bethrothed” to their god.
For a good insight into this definition, I refer to a Haredi newsletter that considered rabbinical authority inseparable from their oral law (the basis of Rabbinical Judaism). “A central aspect of the Jewish commitment: the authority vested in the Torah leadership of each generation, as an integral part of Torah sheba' al Peh (the Oral Law). This authority must be granted to the leaders of each generation, regardless of their relative merit to leaders of other generations. Greater sages have existed in earlier times, but our obligation is to follow those of our age. One who does not accept the Torah leaders of his generation cannot claim to believe in the Oral Law. The Torah warns: 'Do not turn to the idols' (Vayikra 19:4), which the Gemara explains as a reference to conceptual idols, ideologies not based on the Torah (Shabbos 149a)."(4) As these are the same religious sources accepted by Chabad and other Noahide propagandists; as Noahide Laws are sourced from this oral law; as Chabad considers Schneerson this generation’s “sage”, invested with complete authority, as well as the resulting lineage of rabbis and shliachs (emissaries) – we get a clear sense of what the Noahide prohibitions of “idolatry” and “blasphemy” actually entail. The third law is to establish “courts of justice”, which I’ll discuss later in relation to creeping Noahidism and efforts to re-establish the Sanhedrin.
 |
| Just one of innumerable references, all promoted and verified on the online Chabad archives.  |
Central Role of Noahide Laws in Chabad’s Messianism
The alarming influence cultivated by Chabad, through its
interlocking global system of oligarchs – a Judaic form of the “prosperity
gospel” that links material wealth to a sign of divine blessing as an end in and of itself - is rivalled
in perfidy only by the fawning treatment they receive from media and academia.
For example, how the media has given celebrity status to Boteach.(5) If there is any real bending of the knee, it is the submission
to Chabad which enjoys close access to governments from the local up to the
national level, as well as international institutions. Despite hiding its
supremacism in plain sight – Schneerson’s hateful scribblings and the insane
eschatological obsessions of Chabad are openly taught and accessible on their
own websites – this supremacist cult has been recast as promoting universal “tolerance”
and “peace” via the Noahide Laws. While there are boundless resources fearing about such things as Christian nationalism or creeping sharia, scant attention is
given to Chabad’s vast influence and access to the halls of power.
One leading scholar on Schneerson and Chabad, Jewish Studies
professor Elliot Wolfson, has referred to their “postmessianic messianism”
hidden through “open secret” – that “redemption” is timeless and their moshiach
is already here for anyone able to recognize this “divine presence” according
to Chabad. Inspired by the medieval philosopher Judah Halevi, Schneerson (affectionally called "the Rebbe" by Chabad and its supporters) promoted the “ontological difference in the constitution of the Jew and the
non-Jew, both physically and somatically.” The Jews are given a unique role to
play in the “redemption” of the world, while non-Jews are “treated as a means
to benefit the Jews” via their adherence to the Noahide Laws. Yet the latter is
recast by mainstream attention about Noahidism as Chabad’s “conciliatory attitude
toward Gentiles.”(6) Making a parallel with Friedrich Schelling’s “notion of ‘absolute indifference’ of the being or essence (Wesen) that
precedes all ground and is thus referred to as the ‘original ground,’ the
Ungrund, literally the nonground,” Wolfson reads Schneerson as saying differences
between Jews and Gentiles won’t be “erased” in the messianic era (as claimed in
most apologia about Chabad), but rather returned to the “original nonground”
state.
“For the Rebbe, dissemination of the Noahide Laws was part of
his messianic program, a step in the process of a global tikkun (rectification)
that would unify mankind under a common moral code in preparation for an
imminent messianic era,” as Feldman writes. “Delivery of the Noahide code to
humanity would complete the process of ‘civilizing the world.’” “In the years
leading up to his death in 1994, the Rebbe continued to encourage outreach to
political leaders from ‘superpower’ countries like the United States who could
help exert influence around the world.”(7) Those who follow the Noahide Laws
are promised “a share in the world to come”, which actually means: the
passive ability to play a role in the Jewish messianic age, as she observes:
“Chabad rabbis involved in Noahide outreach often depicted
Jews as the active transmitters of divine knowledge and Noahides as passive
recipients, invoking a material/spiritual binary to describe their divinely
instated functions. According to this theological framework, Jews represented
the spiritual realm and cognitive powers of the human mind, intended to act as
transmitters of holiness and revelation and as intermediaries between humanity
and God. Representing the mundane world, Noahides occupied the role of
‘civilizers’ and ‘city builders,’ in the words of one rabbi, who take care of
humanity’s material needs but still require spiritual and moral cultivation – a
process of individual salvation that was connected to a much larger cosmic
rectification (including Israel’s national redemption, the building of the
Third Temple, and the coming of messianic times).”(8)
Creeping Noahidism in the United States
The third injunction of Noahidism is dinim, “to
establish courts of justice” that mandate rabbinic legal systems and institutions to enforce the Noahide Laws, without
any regard or respect for personal, local, or national sovereignty. According to Dr. Michael Schulman, Executive Director of Ask Noah International and
connected to Chabad:
“Every nation, state or province, and municipality is obligated to have a
system of courts to uphold the Noahide Commandments.” Another Noahide source
admits these courts come under the Sanhedrin’s jurisdiction:
“They also have an obligation to implement the Halachah that is determined by
the Sanhedrin of the Jewish people. The Sanhedrin has the responsibility of
establishing Halachah for the entire world….The Sanhedrin is the Supreme Court
of the world. Noachide courts can function independently of each other; but
when a difficult issue arises it must be taken to the Sanhedrin and their
ruling becomes law.” The reconstituted
Sanhedrin has already established a court governing all Noahide courts in the world.
Creeping Noahidism has infiltrated various governments, institutions, political organizations, religious groups, and think-tanks within the past few decades at an increasing rate. We see this especially here in the United States, allegedly governed by the Constitution and sacrosanct liberties reiterated in the Bill of Rights.(9) Every year since April 18, 1978, a bipartisan Congress ritually passes a declaration that is then signed by every President – whether Democrat or Republican – as Education and Sharing Day, USA. The title follows Schneerson's proposal to creep Noahidism under the guise of “educating the nation’s youth.” The day actually commemorates his birthday (11 Nissan according to the Jewish calendar), falling annually sometime between 21st March and 21st April. Greeting the first Education Day in 1978, Schneerson gave a talk boasting how “the timing of this action was conceived as a tribute to our movement.” He traced the "forceful example" of this day that "will become a permanent institution," directly to a halachic principle called "dina dmalchusa, 'Law of the Government'." That is, a government dictate derived not from the laws of a nation but through the rulings of a rabbi like himself, via special access to the ruler’s court.
In one of his teachings in 1986, Schneerson defined “education” as instructing “mankind in the Noahide
Laws”, citing Maimonides.(10) These “must be taught to children so that they
should grow up righteous and good,” although those ethics aren’t innate but
only arise “when non-Jews observe the Seven Noahide Laws.” These Laws will aid
in “the complete perfection of the world,” when “all the nations of the world
who have assisted the Jewish people will join in the worship of G-d” and “to
greet Moshiach speedily and truly in our days.” He viewed the spread of
Noahidism among Gentiles as an essential step to rebuilding the Temple and ushering in the messianic era, a basic teaching
spread to this day among Chabad as we will see with some later examples; as
well as his methods on how Noahide Laws would be imposed among
Gentiles if “education” fails (again, taking his inspiration from Maimonides'
commentary on the Talmud).
The Noahide agenda was laid out by Congress in 1991,
“to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven
Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of
honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state.”
What is this "International Scroll of Honor"? According to a Canadian
Chabad source,
Schneerson "encouraged his followers to publicize the code of seven
Noahide laws to all people globally." This was extending on a global scale
the "National Roll of Honor" given to him by the US president.
"The Rebbe called upon the United States government to exert its
influence" to promote Chabad's own ideas of what is "moral" and
"ethical" worldwide. A mere perusal of the official Chabad website
archives exposes how they see themselves as the power behind
thrones, constantly boasting of their connections with various governments and
oligarchs, of course ascribing all to the "divine" blessings of their
moshiach. "We want Moshiach Now!" as the common Chabad mantra goes, taking an active role in hastening their messianic age.
The 1994 ceremony proclaimed Noahide Laws “the cornerstone of society since the dawn of civilization.” In its official article on Noahidism, Chabad boasts of how the Congressional declarations come from “the talk of the Lubavitcher Rebbe on Shabbat Beshalach 5743/1983.” Chabad Rabbi Zali Shifren admitted the messianic agenda: “These proclamations play a significant role in the final redemption, as nations recognize the universal values of the Seven Noahide Laws.” As noted by anti-Noahidism activist Vincent Bruno, these are not yet US law due to the legal clause “Whereas” but Chabad is devoted to gradually expanding these until they do become law. Indeed, their website boasts of spreading it through state and local governments which makes creeping Noahidism more insidious until it becomes de facto law of the land. This is not set in stone and their efforts can be stopped through the real education of knowing their actual agenda, being the light that shines exposure upon their darkness which masquerades as a "light unto the nations".
There are highly placed Chabad cultists and other extremists within American law and justice departments, devoted to infiltrating the Rebbe’s teachings into US courts. They use various innoculous methods, for example tracing “criminal justice reform” to Schneerson at a Chabad-organized summit at Columbia University. Another method is employed by Rabbi Michael J. Broyde, Emory University law professor and member of the Beth Din of America, who engages in revisionism claiming a “hidden influence” of Jewish law on Common Law. He directly cites Schneerson throughout his works, and is promoted by Chabad in turn. One of Schneerson’s teachings he promotes is asserting that Jews are religiously “obligated” to make Gentiles follow the Noahide Laws. These are to be “imposed” by “advocating for an educational role” as expressed in the “Education and Sharing Day”. Broyde also offers his experience in promoting rabbinical courts in the US, to help Muslims establish sharia courts.(11)
Jack B. Weinstein, a senior judge for the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, was a Chabad associate who discussed and reference the Noahide laws throughout his writings. The Chabad website recounts two meetings Weinstein had with Schneerson, to “seek the Rebbe’s wisdom.” In 1988, he appeared before him “on behalf of all the judges of the Eastern District,” to which Schneerson blessed him: “And certainly every judge of our times is contributing, by making the right decisions, to speeding up the fulfillment of the [prophet’s] promise that the highest court, the Sanhedrin Gedolah, will return [to its seat in Jerusalem] together with our righteous Moshiach.” Then on 17 Dec. 1989, he joined Chabad Rabbi Sholom Lipskar, leader of the Aleph Institute, a Chabad-directed law institute that promoted creeping Noahidism, to seek Schneerson’s blessing again. “You will support my views also, not only report my views?” After Weinstein assured him, Schneerson advised him to use “preventive education to prevent people from going astray from the right way.”
 |
| An official card distributed by Chabad |
They are working to spread Noahidism through outreach to conservatives foolish to think they represent “moral” laws. So for example, Chabad boasts of its connections to the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who despite being Catholic told Chabad lawyer Nathan Lewin in Noahide fashion: “When there was no Jewish justice on the Supreme Court, I considered myself the Jewish justice.” Chabad also developed a link to his liberal counterpart, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In 1999, the Chabad-linked National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs introduced a brief (before the US Supreme Court to accept Talmudic laws, evoking “forms of execution” which will become more significant when we discuss the punishments dictated by Noahidism. In 2020, a writer for the Religious Zionist website Arutz Sheva called on Trump to be “Champion of Noahide Law” by “issuing hundreds of amicus briefings and executive orders”, i.e. to supersede and circumvent Constitutional law and the American legal system. Throughout the article, he traced code-words such as “religious freedom” and “Biblical ethics” to Noahidism – laying out an important method to mask creeping Noahidism upon an unsuspecting (and uninformed) public.
Chabad's definition of "religious freedom" is revealed by Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, the Poway (San Diego) Chabad rabbi who has spoken at the Religious Freedom Institute. He used his survival from a 2019 attack on the synagogue not only to harvest sympathy for Chabad (while never repudiating any of Schneerson’s teachings), but to promote the Noahide Laws. He then appeared at the White House, where he called on Trump to "fight anti-Semitism with all our strength" and praised him as "a mensch par excellence." Upon the invitation of Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon, Goldstein addressed the UN that same year. Ostensibly on the subject of "Combating Anti-Semitism in the Digital Age" (with other filler words thrown in to mask the true agenda), the speech of this rabbi – who was predictably turned into a “hero” by the media – demonstrates Chabad’s vile messianic supremacism and creeping Noahide agenda:
"On the last day of Passover, we read a prophecy from
Isaiah 10 where it talks about a perfect world, the world when Moshiach will
come....We need to welcome a new era that we've been praying for 2,000
years....You're walking into God's home, a Chabad center....In every generation
they rise up against us....Anti-Semitism is not just about the Jewish people,
its about the future of civilization....What is the solution? I want to share
with you [something] that I recently uncovered, a speech from my dear Rebbe,
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who teaches to
millions, including myself. He penned this speech thirty-two years ago to be
read right here at the United Nations, but it didn’t come to fruition. I have
the great opportunity and am very humbled to share with you some of the words
that my dear Rebbe wrote thirty-two years ago, which are so relevant today. The
Rebbe writes about the power of the United Nations. All of you here have been
given by G-d an opportunity to make a difference in the world.”
“The Rebbe taught us something very poignant. That indeed when
the world was repopulated after the flood with Noach, G-d gave seven laws
called the Noachide Laws. This is the bedrock of any civilization that was to
exist, and the Rebbe pleaded that if only the United Nations would go back to
the basics and empower their [members] to adopt the Seven Noachide Laws, this
world would then be a very different world and perhaps we wouldn’t have lost
150,000,000 lives over the last two hundred years. I ask every nation listening
here to consider taking the Seven Noachide Laws and apply it to real daily
life, and we will see a world of difference! The Lubavitcher Rebbe has taught
us that modern technology is a gift from G-d when it is harnessed to do good
and to bring light.”
In an interview with Chabad’s Beis Moshiach Magazine, Goldstein admitted he saw the UN
as “a historic opportunity to give over a direct message from the Rebbe before
the representatives of the entire international community,” Schneerson’s speech
from 1987 on the subject of “Education in ethics for the fulfillment of the
Seven Noachide Laws.” He recounted a
lengthy story Chabad San Diego shliach Rabbi Yehoshua Hecht told him of how Schneerson’s
speech was prepared, after some “Jewish leaders met with the pope in Rome and
kissed his hand and his ring. The Rebbe announced that we must protest against
this vociferously, particularly since we’re talking about idol worship and a
tremendous Chilul Hashem.” “The way to repair the damage caused by the Jewish
leaders’ audience with the pope would be for prominent rabbinical figures to
address the U.N. in the name of the Torah in which they will represent ‘true
Yiddishkeit.’”(12)
The story continues how Schneerson chose Hecht’s father, Rabbi
Avraham Hecht, to deliver the speech, but one needed a UN ambassador’s
invitation to speak before the General Assembly. “It was understood from the
Rebbe that the invitation shouldn’t come from the Israeli delegation, which
Lubavitch had close ties with, as not to allow for it to be politicized.” The
US ambassador was contacted but he “suggested instead that Rabbi Hecht give him
material on the Seven Noachide Laws, and he would distribute them among the
members of the General Assembly.” This was rejected since Hecht insisted on
making the speech himself, and finally the ambassador of an African country
(apparently Burkina Faso) accepted. “Everything was ready for the speech, but
then – the forces of spiritual evil took control. The regime of that distant
African country had just been overthrown, and its UN ambassador was recalled
before the scheduled address. With the inviting diplomat no longer in office,
the speech was removed from the agenda.”
The Magazine boasted of how Goldstein “uses his international media exposure to disseminate the Rebbe’s messages of ‘a Moment of Silence’ and Moshiach in unprecedented ways.” In this same vein, Goldstein referred to “the miracles and wonders we were privileged to see during the terrorist attack in the Chabad House on Acharon Shel Pesach, the day on which the light of Moshiach illuminates brightly.” “The Rebbe is with each one of us, wherever we may be. He will continue to be with us until the complete hisgalus of Melech HaMoshiach, when we will merit to see our king in all his glory, immediately, mamash.” He then concluded the messianic rant: “My personal feeling is that the act of terrorism that took place in the Chabad House is connected with the coming of Moshiach, since it occurred on the day when the illumination of Moshiach shines bright. Therefore, I use this spiritual awakening as an opportunity for practical action designed to hasten the Redemption.”
Chabad Cult and Noahidism Links Expand under Trump
2.0
The latest iteration of the “Education and Sharing”
humiliation ritual was signed by Trump on 9th April 2025.
Trump’s own connections to Chabad have deepened even more than when I first
exposed them in Feb. 2017,
centered around his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Chabad itself has boasted Trump’s ties as “the continuation of a family tradition.” These ties also exist
via Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who accompanied him to a pilgrimage to Schneerson’s grave in Queens (called the Ohel) on 7 Oct. 2024. The
pilgrimage was to seek the corpse's “blessing” to influence his election from
beyond the grave, and it was there that he decided to hire Elon Musk and create DOGE. Lutnick has boasted of his role,
as reported by Chabad.
Another with Trump at the Ohel was Rabbi Levi Shemtov, executive vice president of American Friends of Lubavitch. Known as “The Rebbe’s Man in Washington”, he has delivered prayers at White House events. His father, Rabbi Abraham Shemtov, was one of Chabad’s head administrators. As their shliach (emissary) in Washington, the elder Shemtov was instrumental in the “Education Day” being adopted by Reagan. One of his students was Ronald O. Perelman, a billionaire donor to Trump and also to Chabad. Levi Shemtov has testified before Congress, demanding they criminalize “anti-Semitism” (using the IHRA definition) which includes criticism of Israel. Adopting the same Woke tactics as Critical Theorists, he said it’s not enough to be “not antisemitic” but demanded one must be actively “anti-antisemitic.”(13) Having adopted this definition since 2009, the US State Department has declared its primary agenda to “combat antisemitism globally”. It also intervenes for Chabad in other countries.
Trump’s “Antisemitism Envoy” is Rabbi Yehuda Kaplan, Chabad shliach of Miami who is also close to Miriam Adelson. His profile boasts of “his role in lobbying” for Israel. There is no other special “envoy” to deal with racism or hatred against any other group, yet there has been this position with the Orwellian name “Monitoring and Combating anti-Semitism” since 2004. Through acts of Congress and especially with Trump’s executive orders, the Noahide laws against “blasphemy” are being instituted under the guise of “combating anti-Semitism” when that definition includes any criticism of a foreign government (Israel) and whatever Chabad doesn’t like - Freedom of Speech being a steadfast barrier to the Noahide Laws they would like to impose as part of their messianic predictive programming. In a Congress full of useful idiots who take the AIPAC blood-money (and some who are willing ideologues more loyal to Israel), one figure who illustrates the link I am drawing between Chabad’s Noahide agenda and this Woke Right erosion of free speech on behalf of Zionism, is Mike Lawler (R-NY).
During the “Education and Sharing” humiliation ritual on 19th April 2024, Lawler gave a speech aligning with Chabad: “We honor the enduring legacy of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. The Rebbe was not only a spiritual leader but also a beacon of hope and resilience." "As we approach the 30th anniversary of the Rebbe's passing, let's never cease working to create a nation that truly serves as a beacon of hope and freedom to the world." He personally praised six Chabad members by name in a speech earlier that morning. He also took an Ohel pilgrimage, during which he expressed his absolute support for Israel. In 2023, Lawler cosponsored (along with Josh Gottheimer, D-NJ) a bill that would’ve criminalized Americans boycotting Israel. The bill was finally pulled on First Amendment grounds in March 2025, but clearly this won’t stop them from slipping in a re-introduced bill. Lawler also cosponsored House Resolution 352, which adopted Shemtov’s Woke Zionism: “[The bill] calls on all elected officials, faith leaders, and civil society leaders to condemn and counter all acts of anti-Semitism.” (That bill passed the House 421-1.) The definition of “anti-semitism” and the methods “to condemn and counter” will clearly be determined by the Chabad who have the ears of these shameful politicians.
.jpg) |
| Trump hosting the 2023 Israel Heritage Foundation Gala in New Jersey, where he was awarded the organization's Keter Yerushalayim (Crown of Jerusalem) |
 |
| Conferring with Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun and Miriam Adelson at one of his resorts in Miami, 7 Oct 2024. (Source) |
.jpg) |
Rabbi Dovid Abenson is the founder of an online yeshiva based in New Jersey, who wrote a detailed article laying out the steps of moshiach according to Schneerson. “The world will recognize Hashem’s sovereignty, bringing an end to idolatry and false beliefs.” “Rebuilding of the Beis HaMikdash: The Third Temple will be built in Jerusalem.” “Return of the Davidic Kingship: Mashiach, a descendant of King David, will reign.” This is the vision through which he sees the world and promotes. With this messianic backdrop, Abenson published an open letter to Trump on 12 Nov. 2024. After the usual platitudes and congratulations for his (s)election, Abenson made some concrete proposals:
“I applaud your vision in appointing Elon Musk to lead the new
Department of Government Efficiency. Streamlining federal bureaucracy is indeed
a crucial step toward making government services more effective for all
Americans. Similarly, considering Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to oversee a
health-focused initiative addressing food policy and chronic disease prevention
would be a significant boost to public health.
“To truly make America great again and bring back the Golden
Era, however, there is an essential element that needs to be restored: moral
integrity. I urge you to consider creating a Department of Morality, modeled
after President Reagan’s 1982 tribute to the Lubavitcher Rebbe. The Rebbe
advocated for moral clarity in public institutions—a perspective that resonates
powerfully in today’s world. Just as Reagan honored the Rebbe’s guidance,
establishing a Department of Morality would demonstrate a commitment to
fortifying the nation’s spiritual foundation, a move that truly benefit
America’s future and the whole world. This department would be to promote
solely the Seven Noahide Laws—universal principles of justice, respect, and
morality—and to work with community organizations to foster respect, family
values, and well-being across America.”
“I respectfully suggest appointing an Orthodox rabbi to lead
this new department focused on moral guidance and education within American
institutions. Grounded in the Seven Noahide Laws and inspired by the teachings
of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, this department could collaborate with schools, and
universities to instill a sense of purpose, ethics, and respect for life. By
promoting these universal values, which God gave to all of humanity, we can
inspire meaningful moral change and reduce the spread of immorality in society.
This initiative would not only benefit America but also set a positive example
for the world.”
“The Rebbe, who dedicated much of his life to promoting the
Seven Laws of Noah, understood that true fulfillment comes not merely from
wealth but from values rooted in the Torah. His teachings on universal ethics
offer a path to a more meaningful and morally grounded life—an inspiring legacy
for all humanity.
“I was deeply moved by the humility you displayed in visiting
the burial site of the Lubavitcher Rebbe to mark the anniversary of the October
7 terror attacks in Israel. Your gesture of placing a kippah on your head out
of respect and praying there demonstrated commendable openness and reverence
for the wisdom of Jewish teachings.
“By educating youth in moral principles—especially in schools
and universities—we can counteract the influence of destructive teachings that
defile God and promote harmful values. Much of the current disruption in
America and worldwide stems from corrupt ideologies being taught to young
students, which leads to a loss of spiritual direction and moral clarity. To
address this, it is crucial to emphasize the Seven Noahide Laws, as championed
by the Lubavitcher Rebbe. These universal principles, drawn from Maimonides’
Hilchos Melachim, the Talmud, and the Torah, were reaffirmed at Sinai and
entrusted to the Jewish people to teach all humanity.”
His praise of Elon Musk is not surprising given how close the
Technobrat is to Netanyahu; nor that Abenson would promote the DOGE scam, as
Musk is merely shifting more resources towards the War Machine and Surveillance
State that would “streamline” the benefits toward his own Noahide
messianism. (Elon Musk will be the primary focus of Part 3). And the praise for
RFK Jr. is not surprising, given the latter’s staunch support for Israel, even justifying the murder of Palestinians in such a vile way as to rival Netanyahu’s spokesmen, palling around with Boteach, and his myopic
and idiotic defense of Schneerson. Nor is it any accident Abenson cites “food policy and chronic
disease prevention,” as many MAHA supporters have noted RFK Jr. walking back
his career of opposing the mRNA jabs and other crimes of Big Pharma, into these
other directions. Indeed, RFK Jr. is too busy calling “anti-Semitism” “the worst health crisis” and banning grants to any scientists or medical institutions that boycott Israel. (But more on the reality of RFK Jr. and his “MAHA” psyop in a separate
future article).
Abenson admits that behind all the posturing about “Education and Sharing” is reverence for Schneerson, a humiliation ritual submitting to his messianic claims (with pilgrimages to the Ohel being an increasing obligation for a political career). This is hidden behind innoculous terms such as “morality” and “spiritual foundation” that would especially appeal to conservative Christians. Trump has apparently followed this suggestion - no doubt upon the advice from those higher up within or among the Chabad circle, for example as we saw with Lutnick's suggestion to create DOGE and hire Musk - by forming a “White House Faith Office” led by his spiritual adviser, evangelical preacher Paula White-Cain, christened a “special government employee” similar to Musk. Rather than simply defending religious liberty infringed upon by the State, the Office has a mission to consult “experts within the faith community” on “practices to better align with the American values.” These values aren’t defined but given the character of Paula White herself, subservience to Zionism and profession of the Noahide Laws are redefined as “American values”.
In 2020, Paula White was ranked first on the inaugural “Top 50 Christian Allies of Israel” list published annually by the Israel Allies Foundation, a global Zionist
advocacy group founded by West Bank rabbis and Knesset members, with the mission of “mobilizing
political support for Israel” according to its own website. She used her
position on Trump 1.0’s evangelical advisory board to work closely with Chabad
cultist Jared Kushner, then US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman (who speaks
at many Chabad events), and Special Representatives for International Negotiations
Jason Greenblatt and Avi Berkowitz,
in directing Trump towards the most fanatical Zionist policies. White told the
Jerusalem Post she believed God gave her “an assignment” to ensure Trump “stood strong for
Israel.” As documented by Vincent Bruno, she toured Israel with Rabbi Tuly Weisz of Israel 365, a
fanatical group connected to the Sanhedrin that produced the “Israel Bible,”
which preaches the Noahide Laws for Gentiles. White said her purpose was to study Torah with
rabbis. “You can be Jewish without being Christian, but you cannot be Christian
without understanding Judaism,” as she told the Jerusalem Post. “We believe the
Jews are returning to Israel because that is God’s promise to the Jews. I
believe there should be resettlement. This is your land. This is the Jewish
people’s land. And I believe that the Temple belongs to the Jews, so I believe
there must be restoration.”
Returning to Abenson’s article, he aligns with Trump’s stated agenda to make drastic cuts to the Department of Education(14), but his “solution” is to replace it with a Department of Morality – of course to be led by Chabad, since only then could it be “grounded in the Seven Noahide Laws and inspired by the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.” There is absolutely no respect for free conscience or free will in his worldview, only the impulse to do as commanded by his “Rebbe”: Promoting Noahide Laws among the Gentiles by any means, to hasten the age of moshiach. What he defines as “moral principles” are whatever fits this messianic worldview, while “harmful values” are whatever violates or contradicts this worldview. The Noahides are “to have a share in the world to come”, but the leadership position over the “Department of Morality” is to be exclusive since these “universal” Noahide Laws were solely “entrusted to the Jewish people to teach all humanity.”
 |
| Rabbi Shea Harlig teaching the Adelsons. (Source) |
 |
| Rabbi Ari Berman conferring with Adelson (Source) |
 |
| Rabbi Ari Berman speaking with Elon Musk at the inauguration. (Source) |
Trump’s inauguration prayer was given by Rabbi Ari Berman, President of Yeshiva University. A Modern Orthodox/Religious Zionist rabbi from a different lineage than the haredi Chabad, he received his PhD concerning the Ger Toshav, Gentiles who follow the Noahide Laws, for which he has an academic paper. Indeed, his inauguration speech crept through Noahide concepts such as “foundational Biblical values” and “to be a beacon of light and a mover of history”, as well as the standard professions of loyalty to Israel. Berman also met with Elon Musk. And in an interview with Ynet News, he gave some insights that affirm my thesis about the MIGA, Woke Zionism, and Technocracy agenda:
“This administration certainly understands that and has
already made strides to showcase and broadcast to all the universities that the
kind of antisemitism that we have seen on college campuses across the country
since October 7 will not be tolerated and there will be consequences. So I am
optimistic that there will be changes across the country about this….I spoke
with Elon a couple of times. He's someone who is a really strong asset to the
Trump administration and the changes he's going to do in America…. At the
end of the event I was speaking with Jeff Bezos and I was telling him that my
reservist son was a Hebrew University graduate in computer science last year
and he was looking for a position in Israel. Jeff was talking about how proud
he was about what Amazon was doing in Israel.”
In summer 2024, Berman attended and signed onto the Rome Call
for Artificial Intelligence Ethics, a conference in Hiroshima that brought
together Abrahamic religious leaders, ostensibly to pursue “human dignity-centered approaches to AI.” The fact that representatives from
Big Tech firms such as Microsoft – one of the main funders of Project Stargate
– also attended shows the agenda benefited Big Tech more than “human dignity”.
Berman’s statement cited Noahide buzzwords like “universal moral principles” but made the Woke
Zionist and Technocratic agenda clear: “In an increasingly polarized world,
plagued by the rising tide of antisemitism and moving so quickly with the rise
of AI, it is a powerful statement of unity that the Rome Call signatories call
for an international collaboration of faith and industry to achieve an ethical
technological future.” The Rome Call’s symbol is a Kabbalistic merkaba, combining two tetrahedra resembling the
Star of David, and stylized as a digital merkaba with the heading “RenAIssance”
to further reveal its view of AI is more technocratic than “human
dignity-centered”. Berman’s Yeshiva University teaches AI ethics from a perspective that, given its allegiance to Messianic Zionism, clearly
regards opposition to Israel as “un-ethical”.
 |
| Convergence of messianic groups: Kahanists, settler leaders like Smotrich and Ben-Gvir associated with Netanyahu's government, and the yellow "moshiach" flag of Chabad. (Image source) |
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
Using AI Technocracy to Combat “Blasphemy” Against Zionism
One of the leading Religious Zionist interpreters of these “AI ethics” is Rabbi Mois Navon, founder of Mobileye, an AI startup that invented an advanced driving assistance technology. Working alongside a Zionist advocacy group whose committee includes Rabbi Tuli Weisz (whom I mentioned earlier as Paula White’s Noahide teacher), Navon frequently cites the concept of “tikkun olam” (repairing the world) as Zionism’s role in the world. “Technology is the spearhead of tikkun olam,” as he expressed in an interview. His works often cite the Noahide Laws as the basis of “AI ethics”. He has spoken at Chabad events, sharing a common messianic agenda. “We will only truly achieve a harmonious society,” as he expresses in an article on social media ethics, “when the world understands that the Torah is from heaven. And this will only take place when the world understands that there is a divine law giver in heaven. And this, of course, will only take place with the coming of the Mashiach.” Yet he also cites Amalek, a concept often applied to various individuals and entire groups by messianic Zionists(15), “a fight for the perfection of the world” whose victory “is embodied in the [rebuilt] Holy Temple.”
If Navon is archetypal of the “intellectual” approach, the archetypal Zionist street thug is Ross Glick, a marketing executive who touts himself a “dedicated Zionist” and “advocate for Israel,” “combating antisemitism in the streets, in Washington D.C., and online.” Glick was interviewed by CNN about his efforts using AI facial recognition to “track down anti-semites” and nark them out to his “government contacts”.(16) The interview touted his “deep expertise in traditional and clandestine PR services, including crisis management, media advisory, monitoring, and narrative control.” Those are all tactics Glick used until recently as the executive director of Betar, a fanatical Zionist group describing itself as “the North American arm of the international movement of Ze’ev Jabotinsky,” the Revisionist Zionist leader whose proteges founded the Irgun terrorist gang. Betar also embraces the lineage of Rabbi Meir Kahane and claimed credit for the arrest of pro-Palestine student protest leader Mahmoud Khalil at Columbia University. Betar used various online tactics to spy on and dox anyone involved in the protests. Betar has even attacked other Jews whose views may stray from the most fanatical Zionism.
“In part by using artificial intelligence, the group has compiled dossiers on the most active protestors to submit to the Trump administration for deportation,” as reported by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Betar clearly has some contacts at the USCIS, which announced it would scan the posts of visa applicants for any “anti-Semitism” - not for any actual crimes, but solely for wrong-think. The group also has the allegiance of a Justice Department devoted to criminalizing all dissent against this foreign government of Israel. It was already in contact with appointees even before the inauguration. Betar’s terrorist campaign was greeted by Ephraim Rabin, Israeli-American astronaut and CEO of an industrial chemical tech distributor, as “The culling of terror supporters begins…Out with the students, The admins, The facilitators!” Regarding Israel's war, Rabin spoke in messianic terms: "A New world order is coming."
These are the same terminologies used by Chabad and the Noahides for the messianic age. “Initially, there will be no change in the world order, other than its readiness to accept messianic rule,” according to Rabbi Nissan Dubov, Chabad shliach of Wimbledon, England. “All the nations of the world will strive to create a new world order.” Glick has worked closely with Chabad and even posted about his visit to their Brooklyn headquarters. “Deeply grateful for the Rebbe’s vision and the enduring light of Chabad!” Schneerson himself viewed the growth in technology as an “unveiling” of the messianic age. This general view of technology as an unveiling is not unique –Martin Heidegger expressed the growth of technology as aletheia, an unveiling of truth – but what is unique to Schneerson was his view of technology as a linear progression that would help usher in the moshiach, thus the ease with which Chabad (and their Noahidism) can align with the Technocrats. He welcomed rapid technological growth as “the infrastructure to bind the world together as one,” “the interface between two worlds” when the messianic age would bring down “heaven” to Earth. Nowadays his students and followers embrace AI in the name of “education” (whose true meaning we have already established) – guiding it toward their shared messianic agenda alongside other Messianic Zionist groups and leaders. “If guided prudently, AI can open new doors in education,” as expressed by one Chabad source.
That “prudent guidance” has been centralizing AI into the
hands of back-channels operated in Israel and staffed by Unit 8200 alumni who
have partnered with the various Big Tech platforms, whose oligarchs see their
own interests also being served through this control. Many are radicalized by yeshiva military academies which
teach much the same things as Chabad. After 7th October 2023, a
group of Israeli tech engineers created “Iron Truth” as a tool to remove social media content deemed “anti-Semitic” but most often
critical of Israel at platforms such as Meta and TikTok. They named it after
the Israeli AI-based Iron Dome missile program which the Zionist-linked
technocrats behind SpaceX (Elon Musk), Palantir (Peter Thiel and Alex Karp),
and Anduril (Palmer Luckey and Trae Stephens) were contracted by Trump to
install as “Golden Dome” over the United States – with an initial budget
of $175 billion, not counting all the "unexpected" costs, the energy
costs needed to run the facilities etc.. Each of these oligarchs has Unit 8200 connections as documented in my last article. Its about not only profits but also their
delusion to control all data and thus create an "Internet of
Everything". Chabad and its Noahidism is best served by a Techno-monarchy
where a handful of oligarchs centralize these systems and whose interests are
clearly aligned with theirs, as seen in how speech against their interests is
being suppressed and criminalized.
UNESCO released its “Recommendation on the Ethics of AI” in 2021, calling on governments and Big Tech oligarchs to work together in controlling the data and suppressing free speech. This was expanded in July 2024, when UNESCO issued a joint report with the World Jewish Congress (which defends Chabad and whose president Ronald S. Lauder runs a school with the messianic cult) alarmed at how Generative AI “threatens Holocaust memory and fuels antisemitism”, merely by answers expressing wrongthink. The report called for “supervising, guiding and moderating” Generative AI by controlling all the data mined into it. This was followed by the WJC creating an Institute for Technology and Human Rights. “The new institute builds on years of WJC’s successful confrontation of online hate that has led to robust changes in policies related to antisemitism, Holocaust denial and conspiracy myths.” There is absolutely no respect for any free speech when it comes to anything this well-funded political pressure organization wants, and yet its voice has rewritten these policies – while these hypocrites continue to staunchly support Israel and work closely with this messianic cult whose hate speech includes the concept that Jews and Gentiles are “separate species” with “different souls”, that the Noahide Laws are to be “imposed” upon all the nations with no respect for their sovereignty, free will, and distinct traditions.
As founder and CEO of a company called Generative AI for Good,
Shiran Mlamdovsky Somech works towards controlling Generative AI for Zionist
objectives. “AI can help us mold the narrative,” as she told the Adelson-funded Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), which promotes the most
fanatical Zionism. “Our slingshot is technology.” Somech has absolutely no
desire for free speech and debate, for the Zionist narrative to be just one of
all others available online, but only to “hunt” all “antisemitic narratives” across social media and online platforms, flagging
content and “patterns”, and “detecting and tracking” any speech opposed to the
Zionist narrative. On 10 Sept. 2023, she cohosted “Hack the Hate” conference along with the Unit 8200 Alumni Association, at Microsoft’s Tel Aviv offices.
It brought together the Israeli government, Microsoft and other Big Tech
companies, the World Zionist Organization, and such political pressure groups
as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to take “the first steps towards a unified
and tech-driven approach to combating online hate and antisemitism” “in the
spirit of Israel’s startup nation.” She has written various hasbara propaganda
articles, waging a war to control global Generative AI. “In the digital
battlefield, Generative AI is both a shield and a sword for Israel,” she writes
in one article.
“By leveraging its cutting-edge technological expertise, Israel leads the fight
to safeguard freedom and uphold democratic values worldwide.”
[….To be continued in Part 2, when we will see more on who
actually does commit violence and what all that entails with the campaign to
spread Noahidism]
.jpg) |
| ....and on to Part 2, focused more on the Temple agenda and the punishments Schneerson and others advocate for we who "violate" the Noahide Laws |
Footnotes:
(1) The most active Technocrat in this regard is Peter Thiel. Although he describes his own beliefs as “somewhat heterodox”, this doesn’t stop him from cobbling together threads from various traditions into his own “political theology”. Yet he draws the most superficial conclusions, with predictable obsession around such themes as eschatology and “cheating” death. I find nothing substantive in his mediocre ravings which are nothing but a materialist nihilism using whatever traditions he thinks can be distorted toward his Technocratic delusions. For example, using the Mimetic theory of René Girard but divorcing it from its Catholic/Christian context and twisting it as part of his own “guru” Curtis Yarvin’s profane ideas of “techno-monarchy”.
(2) Aside from the 43 conscientious objectors who rejected how their activities were used against Palestinians, and a more
recent effort by some opposed to occupying Gaza, Unit 8200 is devoted to not only the Eretz Israel agenda,
but Netanyahu’s pet project of making Israel a “global cyber-power” at the
expense of other nations. And as I uncovered through some research in early
2020, there are many direct links between Unit 8200 and Chabad. The research
was part of a speech I was preparing for a conference in Oporto that summer,
but global events obviously disrupted it. The links have merely intensified
since, so more material for a future article.
(3) Rachel Z. Feldman. Messianic Zionism in the Digital Age: Jews, Noahides, and the Third Temple Imaginary. New Brunswick/Camden/Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2024, pp. 79-80.
(4) Horav Moshe Feinstein, "A Time for Action," The Jewish Observer (New York: Agudath Israel of America), Tammuz 5733 / June 1973, Vol. IX, No. 4, p. 4.
(5) Using his platform to express the most fanatical Zionism and screaming “anti-Semite” at those expressing the slightest criticism, accusing entire countries of “anti-Semitism”, even calling upon “repudiation” of other Jews who express opposition to Israel, this vile Boteach capitalized on the (manufactured) Kabbalah craze in Hollywood to be christened “America’s Rabbi” by a fawning media. Aside from the praises of Corporate Media, his acolytes include such “alt” psyops as RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Steve Bannon. Just one example of Boteach's “tolerance” from his own writings: "From the outset Judaism aimed to destroy the idols and false Gods that ancient man was wont to worship." (Boteach. Judaism for Everyone: Renewing Your Life Through the Vibrant Lessons of the Jewish Faith. New York: Basic Books, 2002, p. 405).
(6) Elliot Wolfson. Open Secret: Postmessianic Messianism and
the Mystical Revision of Menahem Mendel Schneerson. New York: Columbia
University Press, 2009, pp. 229-231; and Adam Sutcliffe. What Are Jews For?:
History, Peoplehood, and Purpose. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
2020, pp. 286-287.
(7) Feldman, op. cit., pp. 80-81.
(8) ibid., p. 94.
(9) An ideal long proven a shameful fiction, whether by the stealth
imposition of a private bank (Federal Reserve) which controls the entire monetary
system; the innumerable codes and taxes instituted upon the people every year
not even mentioned in the Constitution; undeclared wars and entangling
alliances having more to do with Wall Street, war profiteers, and special
interests; the gradual institution of “laws” to erode civil liberties and grow
the Surveillance State slipped through various Congressional bills, Executive
Orders, etc.. As for the Constitution itself, I agree with the observations
made by Lysander Spooner in No Treason and Natural Law,
even more prescient now than in the late 19th century.
(10) “In fact, in the Seven Noahide Laws we find the
commandment for education: ‘The duty is enjoined upon them to set up judges in
each district to deal with these six commandments and to caution (education)
the people’ (Rambam, Laws of Kings 9:14).” Again reiterating their
importance of establishing courts to enforce the Noahide Laws and carry out
punishments for violators. The Sanhedrin is regarded as having jurisdiction
over all the nations from its seat in Jerusalem. Its no accident the
modern Sanhedrin is closely bound up with spreading Noahidism and efforts to
rebuild the Temple – these are all related steps according to Jewish
messianism.
(11) Although the “creeping sharia” narrative is promoted by fanatical Zionists, who are hypocritical about the ongoing real threat of creeping Noahidism and Chabad’s influence, and to whip up war frenzy for Americans to fight wars against the enemies of Israel, it would be naïve to fall for the dialectic that denies any sharia. Ironically, Zionist proponents of Noahidism have gone to Al-Azhar to suggest that sharia is compliant with the Noahide Laws. One Egyptian shaykh reciprocated by visiting Israel, in his own outreach to Noahidism. And Zionists haven’t been averse from pitting Muslims against Europeans, as part of an insane messianic war between “Esau” (Europe/Rome) and “Ishmael” (Arabs/Muslims) their “prophecies” cite as a step toward moshiach. The Noahide promoters have cautioned that anti-sharia laws could harm halachic courts in the US, in what I termed an “intersectional alliance” in 2018. At the same time, we must realize the other dialectic is Christian nationalism, which advocates for Zionism and its own imposition of Biblical law upon the US.
(12) That “damage” was a symbolic sign of respect made to a “Goy”,
Pope John Paul II who ironically is known for having kowtowed to Jewish leaders
and organizations in ways unprecedented to Catholic doctrine, and who compromised
much with Zionism. So it is that this act made to preach Noahidism as “universal
peace,” originated in the outrage of a fanatical, exclusivist rabbi against "idol worship".
(13) Others have noted the close resemblance his words have to
Woke Left grifter Ibram X. Kendi, who similarly used a vast definition of
“racism” and said it’s not enough to be “non-racist” but one must be actively
“anti-racist”. In fact, the words are so similar I wouldn’t be surprised if
Shemtov plagiarized them, just changing the “oppressed” class to the “chosen”
nation.
(14) A rhetorical ploy since US schools receive most of their
funding from the local and state levels and not the federal government. Trump
2.0 is only shifting resources toward funding other programs of the Managerial
State, rather than some consistent “gutting” of the government as fear-mongered
by anti-Trump Statists who completely miss the plot. The “Christian nationalism”
behind Project 2025 cannot be separated from its links with Zionism and Technocracy,
both of which were continuously enabled by the other dialectic. For example,
the bipartisan legislation that eroded freedom of speech under the guise of “combating
anti-Semitism” and the anti-BDS laws. That dialectic ignores the Heritage
Foundation’s forming a “National Task Force to Combat Antisemitism” – using and expanding upon the
bipartisan servitude to AIPAC – and its Project Esther,
the blueprint Trump 2.0 is using to criminalize dissent against Israel. Meanwhile,
those institutions are being given over to Chabad cultists to direct while the
Christian nationalists behind Project 2025 are giving a religious veneer to an
emerging Techno-Monarchy that will be guided by Noahidism.
(15) See for example my 2015 article,
“Nuking ‘Amalek’? The Israeli nuclear threat and evoking Iranians, Germans as
‘Amalekites’ in religious Zionism.” Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders frequently
evoke “Amalek” in relation to the Palestinians. For example, finance minister
and West Bank settler leader Bezalel Smotrich evoked Amalek in calling for the “total annihilation” of Gaza.” They believe they have a divine mandate to “smite” Amalek entirely
and collectively (1 Samuel 15:2-3). Yet even a secular Israeli academic, Hannah
Kashner, evoked it to justify “collective punishment” of the Palestinians (her relevant
paper “Rationales Justifying Collective Punishment of Amalek,” seems to have
been scrubbed from the internet). Chabad promotes it among Noahides as a “spiritual evil” of “seven evil nations” that can be remedied ultimately by acceptance of the Noahide
Laws by Gentiles.
(16) "In November 2024, Betar US ('Betar') compiled a
list of pro-Palestinian foreign students it sought to have deported, naming Mr.
Taal as the sole individual identified. Betar’s director, Ross Glick, delivered
this list to Senator John Fetterman and aides from the offices of Senators Ted
Cruz and James Lankford, later telling the New York Post, 'They all gave me the
thumbs up.' And added that Betar was in communication with prospective Trump administration
appointees at the Department of Justice regarding enforcement actions against individuals
on the list." (Case 3:25-cv-00335-ECC-ML, U.S. District Court - N.D. of N.Y., Mar. 15, 2025, p. 14). Fetterman, Cruz,
and Lankford all have extensive records voting for Israel and taking money from
AIPAC.
No comments:
Post a Comment