Thursday, December 4, 2025

Noahide public executions?; Culture and Western Civilization; America and the Hyperstition of “Edom”; Israeli/Technocratic geofencing; Christian Zionism’s “martyr” revivalism; and the Pagan Panic of 2025 (Part 1)

by Sean Jobst

4 December 2025

[I intended this as the third and final installment of my analysis of Kirk’s assassination, but research soon led me in other directions. Yet, more details about the assassination will be weaved throughout as emblematic of this broader zeitgeist. Continued from Part 1 and Part 2. Due to the length of this developing story, I’ve also divided this current article into two parts.]






Noahide Public Executions and Criminalizing Thoughtcrime

Aside from the denials from Netanyahu and ex-Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, another whose public statements have been gratuitous is Josh Hammer, senior editor for Newsweek, conservative talking-head at other platforms, and a leading US Zionist sayan.(1) Previously obscure outside some limited hangouts, Hammer came into public consciousness as failing antagonist of the debate with Dave Smith, moderated by Kirk in July. Hammer was clearly out of his elements, too used to monologue within his uncritical echo chamber (one of the perks of editing a “news” magazine that naturally published all his screeds). Since the debate, he has been plugging his March 2025 book Israel and Civilization, citing it in every interview especially after Kirk’s assassination. 

Less than 24 hours before the murder, Hammer ‘randomly’ dug up a Trump tweet from April 19, 2013 about “public execution,” responding without any other context: “based.” (8:05 PM Sep. 9, 2025) Then in his own words only hours after the assassination, with no direct context, Hammer tweeted: “Public execution.” (5:57 PM Sep 10, 2025)

I connect this to Noahide laws due to the specific formula of “public execution,” as the norm in the US (at least in states with the death penalty) are executions closed to the public (aside from victims' family and selected officials),carried out after a lengthy process that could take several years or even decades. But public execution does have an established role within the Noahide laws creeping into society via the Chabad-directed “Education and Sharing Day” commemorated by every President and Congress since 1978, with little outrage from the right/left dialectic that fearmongers about either “creeping sharia” or “Christian Nationalism” as primary threats within society.(2) As I wrote in The Rise of Technocratic Noahidism

“Chabad cultists and other proponents of Noahidism lie by omission when they propagandize about ‘seven universal laws’ they actually view as seven categories under which many more laws apply – some sources cite more than others. The injunction against ‘blasphemy’ was also defined by Rabbi Yoel Schwartz, president of the Sanhedrin’s Court for the Noahides, as ‘Respecting the Creator and the sages who are familiar with His Torah, and respecting the places of worship where the Torah is learned and prayers are recited to him. It is forbidden, God forbid, to speak harshly against them or to curse them.’ We see this with the fierce backlash conservative podcaster Candace Owens received after confronting Chabad cultist Rabbi Shmuely Boteach with Schneerson’s own supremacist writings and statements. She was predictably accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ but the lesson is clear even for Jews opposed to Schneerson: ‘Criticize the late Chabad Rebbe at your peril.’ Noahidism’s definition of ‘blasphemy’ thus includes criticism of its rabbinical proponents, especially the Chabad movement and its extensive political connections. Its ‘blasphemous’ to even ‘strike’ a Jew (as opposed to a Gentile) because they are ‘bethrothed’ to their god. … Through acts of Congress and especially with Trump’s executive orders, the Noahide laws against ‘blasphemy’ are being instituted under the guise of ‘combating anti-Semitism’ when that definition includes any criticism of a foreign government (Israel) and whatever Chabad doesn’t like - Freedom of Speech being a steadfast barrier to the Noahide Laws they would like to impose as part of their messianic predictive programming.’”

The nascent Sanhedrin evoked Kirk's death to specifically cite the Noahide laws. “The path to repairing the world [tikkun olam], stopping murder and bloodshed, and all other great injustices committed in the world is when all nations recognize the choosing of the Holy One in the people of Israel,” it said in a statement published five days after his death. It turned him into a quasi-prophetic “martyr” for their supremacism: “Charlie Kirk was among the wise of the nations [goyim] of the world, who understood reality clearly, who understood the divine election of the people of Israel.” It then proposed his death could be used to spread Noahidism, through which their own messianic ambitions could be realized:

“In the terrible murder of Charlie Kirk, the fact stood out that those who oppose and hate Israel hold to the path of murder and violence. The path to heal the world from murders and other injustices is through the people of Israel, supporting it and learning from it. We call on all nations of the world to walk in his path, to understand that the key to repairing the world is the positive connection with the God of Israel and learning the good ways from His people Israel through observing the seven commandments of the sons of Noah, as the Holy One, blessed be He, gave to the people of Israel at Mount Sinai.”

Josh Hammer was raised in an upper-class Reform Jewish family in New York but became more religious later, calling himself a “baal teshuvafor whom advocating for Israel gives identity and “nationhood” even while paying lip service to being American, as it suits his interests to manufacture consent for Zionism. A protégé of “National Conservative” guru Yoram Hazony, Hammer is just one of many sayanim “activated” after 7th Oct. 2023, explaining both his quick rise into publicity and sudden ingratiation into Kirk’s orbit. He thereafter formed close ties with Rabbi Zvi Drizin of The Intown Chabad of Dallas, having this Chabad cultist officiate at his wedding and appearing on his podcast in Feb. 2024. In May 2025, Hammer joined an event at the Las Olas Chabad Center in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 





Someone linked to Chabad would obviously be aware of one of their signature issues – the Noahide Laws. His ilk sees it as their messianic mission to convert Gentiles to follow Noahide laws, with even “Christian” always qualified with “Judeo” (but never the reverse since they are its root) – we who aren’t Christians or monotheists need not apply in their “Civilization” which they hijacked and perverted from pre-existing Culture. All their propaganda is aimed to convince Western peoples to deny our own rich tapestry of indigenous European cultures going back thousands of years into the far distant past, long before these universalizing ideas from the Mideast infested our lands.(3) At the heart of this propaganda is Hammer's consistent efforts to “prove” that what he calls Western civilization” only started with the Bible, a recurring theme of his book that is so mediocre he *must* go out of his way to remind people it even exists. 

His immediate response after Kirk’s assassination was more of the same: “We spoke less than 24 hours ago – Charlie joked how he was going to plug my book on this very tour.” (As we will see later, that lie is contradicted by texts). So too did he have the sangfroid to turn Kirk into a “martyr” for his own cause. Although the narcissist (further inculcated through a sense of being “chosen”) has called himself Kirk's “brain trust”, Hammer is not a mastermind but only the mediocre egregore of ideas astroturfed into public discourse through billionaire donors and the Israeli State levers subverting our nation. When Kirk turned he did so as a golem originally funded by David Horowitz and other Zionist donors. And only a week after the assassination, the Times of Israel published an article by a Sephardic philosopher, evoking Golem to describe American Zionists and their feedback loop with Israel. One has to wonder because as occurred in that myth, the golem was ultimately killed by his creators.

To call Israel and its political/financial interests into question is considered “blasphemy” under Noahidism, with labels of “anti-Semitism” meant not only to squash dissent for even the most mundane criticisms but to project a blood libel against critics. This is a natural culmination from criminalizing of BDS and other legislation against Wrongthink. The Noahide penalty specifically mentioned for such “offenses” is beheading, in lieu of which could be envisioned any decapitation (or even shooting in the neck). Public execution is mandated in the same religious sources openly praised by the likes of Wolicki, Hammer, and Shapiro. “One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanhedrin 56a)” (“Noachide Laws,” The Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 1191). 

One of the sources for Noahide laws is Maimonides (1138-1204), whom Hammer cites as the “model” for the West to follow in reconciling reason with the Bible (rather than look back to the Classical Pagan philosophers like Plato or Aristotle whom they appropriated and tried to harmonize with their incomplete “divine” law). Maimonides wrote, “Moses our Teacher was commanded by the Almighty to compel the world to accept the Commandments of the Sons of Noah. Anyone who fails to accept them is executed” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings and Wars, 8:13). Recall how Hammer constantly cites Moses as the origin of “Western civilization,” such as in his conversation with Wolicki. This same mantra is also repeated by Shapiro and Babylon Bee founder Joel Berry, with an obvious agenda that goes beyond just political support for Israel into deep social engineering. When so many of these figures are repeating the exact same slogan, their ideas promoted by Big Tech algorithms, its clearly not organic but bred from an artificial hive mind. This is why they speak in terms of “civilizational war” and use murderous language against those blaspheming their dogma.

Many of the architects behind Project 2025 have also advocated the expansion of public executions. Their professions of “Judeo-Christian” values and efforts to erode free speech via Project Esther reveals their alleged “Nationalism” is not even American in inspiration or alignment, but a scheme towards Techno-Zionist oligarchy.(4) Similar calls for “public executions” were made in many Trump speeches going back years (recall the 2013 tweet cited earlier) and in a June 2024 fundraising email: "Haul out the guillotine!" Even Kirk himself said on a THOUGHTCRIME panel discussion in Feb. 2024 how death penalties “should be public, it should be quick, it should be televised”: “I think at a certain age it’s an initiation.” Many others have called for a “return” of the guillotine, from a disgraced judge in San Francisco to a former governor of Maine. 

I don't claim these individuals are conscious of this alignment, but their repetitions build a pattern normalizing Noahide laws that cheapens life and justifies death for such “offenses,” slipped into legislation and enforced by State institutions (suppressing investigations into the Epstein files or Kirk assassination, ultimately to protect the same Israeli interests). That Kirk's death was intended as a public execution is further underscored by the extent to which various TPUSA Faith leaders and other Zionists have exploited it like a ritualistic “martyrdom” for their own cause. This is why I termed this series a cultural overview and useful here is the concept of Hyperstition. Coined by 'Dark Enlightenment' philosopher Nick Land, Hyperstition refers to fictional ideas becoming “real” through belief or hype. These are ideas amplified through cultural forces, media, and a collective hive mind. 

Noahide “blasphemy” includes conservative voices who have become critical of Israel and the lobby’s stranglehold over US foreign policy. A perusal of Zionist newspapers, websites, and channels reveals a fatal obsession with Owens, Carlson, and others who were once faithful servants of Zionism before waking up.(5) This was on display at the Republican Jewish Coalition Summit, where much attention was directed against these critics, with open threats made by Randy Fine and Mark Levin. Bluster from such loudmouth clowns breed a murderous climate augmented by donors’ blood-soaked billions. Their own warmongering and genocidal invectives against Palestinians are an Imperial boomerang they want to visit against their domestic critics. 

Levin has unleashed his vile supremacism within the past year, such as when he responded to a European-American who challenged his “anti-Semitism” libels: “It's in your family's DNA.” Speaking at the CUFI summit in D.C., 22nd July 2025, Levin said: “This is God's war that we're fighting. If Europe is too stupid to understand, that's their problem. I will remind you, that's where Hitler was born.” With a cheering Miriam Adelson and John Hagee in the front row, Levin evoked the Civil War and WWII to promote domestic warfare “with the same isolationists we have right now,” who have “seeped into our culture.” These caricatures of Wetiko project their own mind virus against their critics, whom they refer to in terms of social pathogens.







Judeo-Supremacists Hijack “Western Civilization” for Zionism

The likes of Hammer try to appropriate timeless cultures into their own prism of an ahistorical event of “Moses” and Mount Sinai that remains shrouded in mystique within all three Abrahamic religions, making their supremacist narrative the central pivot around which all “the Nations” (“Goyim,” Gentiles, Ethnikos) allegedly turn. Even while herding gullible Americans and Europeans into his own Judeo-supremacist (Zionist) cause, the reality behind Hammer’s view of European cultures is one of vile hatred, projecting his own fairy tales of “Amalek” upon our ancestors. As he wrote on Nov. 12, 2019: “Jew-hatred is inherent in the European DNA.” And earlier on Feb. 18, 2019: “Europe will never change. Jew-hatred is inherent in its collective DNA.” These he has never disavowed and is now exhibited in his Woke Zionist hatred of all who dare uphold individual liberties and collective sovereignty over lockstep subservience.

As a baal teshuva, Hammer has chosen a religious tradition whose messianism and eschatology denigrates the West as “Edom,” going back to Rome whose very existence was a source of envy by messianic fanatics. For a religion founded upon a sense of being “chosen” and alleged prophecies of all other nations bowing to the rule of their own god and temple (exhibited throughout the Book of Isaiah), to encounter and be conquered by a universal empire, with multiple deities in contrast to their own monotheism, would engender such deep seated hatred and envy (which is always self-destructive and only eats at the human soul and spirit). Of course the truth is that while we are denigrated as “Edom” within these fairytales, indigenous Europeans have no relation to any of these Biblical tribesConscious of this “Edom” tradition against Rome, Hammer instead names Jerusalem as the twin “Western” city to Athens, a deceptive trick as he also denigrates the Hellenic tradition.(6) 

His Daily Wire associate Ben Shapiro gave a speech at Stanford University, mocking “white European ideals,” claiming “Western civilization” is solely “Judeo-Christian,” and “Race does not have ideals, it’s just a melanin level,” even while constantly asserting his own woke identity politics coming from his allegedly "superior" genetics. Shapiro himself evoked Noahide laws on several occasions, including as far back as a 2003 article, in a conversation with Jordan Peterson at the Rubin Report in 2018, and upon the death of evangelical zionist pastor John MacArthur earlier this year. 

Hammer clearly sees himself as different from Western cultures even while Ziosplaining “Western civilization,” when he tweets such things as: “I am Jewish. Proudly. I advocate every single day of my life for the Jewish people and for the Jewish state of Israel.” He constantly tries to evoke a West he despises as “Amalek,” for his own Judeo-supremacist cause, claiming: “The Hebrew Bible is the wellspring of Western civilization.” So too does he keep repeating this one mantra in multiple posts: “Charlie was a bridge-builder – a stalwart supporter of the Jewish-Christian alliance to save the West.” In June 2025, the fanatical Israel Hayom published his veiled threat: “The West needs Israel to survive”, a trope we will see repeated by several others cited in the next section. Hammer followed this up in July by making “the Destiny of the West” contingent upon “The Fate of the Jewish Nation.” These are obvious threats couched in the gaslit semantics of false ‘necessity’.

Ironically, Hammer and Shapiro are *correct* (but a complete inversion from the ways they assume) when they extol a nebulous “civilization” while denigrating actual cultures, when we consider the cyclical worldview of ancient Europeans – as opposed to the linear of Judaism and the other two Abrahamic religions – which survived in Western philosophy via such thinkers as Giambattista Vico and Oswald Spengler. The latter made an interesting point that “civilization” is the last, petrified stage of culture in rapid decline. Civilization is often mercantile and ideological, rather than being organic like Culture. There are many of us who celebrate our cultures and want no part in what they define as “civilization,” epitomized by Empire, Debt and greed, and the barbarous actions of their ethno-state in occupied Palestine around which our own well-being is supposed to be contingent. There is an overarching Western heritage and tradition, but even the definition through which these Judeo-supremacists tack along their own messianic fables onto “the West” has changed over time as noted by the French historian and philosopher Dominique Venner (1935-2013): 

“In Spengler's time, 'West' was synonymous with Europe. The Italian historian Emilio Gentile has stated that in 1900, at the start of the Exposition Universelle in Paris, 'civilization rhymed with modernity, modernity with European, and European with Western.' At that time, the United States of America was still a marginal power that remained remote from Europe. In 1927, when the Catholic and Maurassian essayist Henri Massis published his book Defence of the West, the 'West' was conflated with France. More recently, Maurice Bardeche's review that was published from 1952 until 1982 and titled Defense de l'Occident was referring to Europe more than to the United States. It was especially during the period following 1950 that the word's meaning changed because of the Cold War, the new East-West struggle that pitted the two victors of the Second World War against each other. From then on, 'The West' (the Occident) has been conflated with 'the west' (the cardinal direction), that is to say the United States, which was the main power in the face of a very real threat from the Soviet Union, before and after Stalin's death.”(7)







A few pages later, Venner cites examples of the European cultural undercurrent within US culture but his point being the dominant political elite was at odds with this cultural and intellectual undercurrent. I can cite here the Deist founders directly inspired by the ideals of Classical Greece and Rome via the European Enlightenment; great poets and philosophers throughout American literature; the strong anti-militarism and non-interventionist principles that attracted many great American minds; and the anti-statist individualists who upheld liberties and Natural Law. In contrast is the anti-Western stream Venner describes as the same fanatic theocratic element that led to “Manifest Destiny”, a universalizing mission, Empire replacing Republic, and now subservience to Israel – all coalesced into the perverted “Western civilization” of Woke Zionists. And its exactly this stream that is being challenged increasingly by large segments of American society, to the trepidation of these oligarchic interests.

Contrary to their gaslighting against the West, by its very nature Zionism is a repudiation of Europe. And indeed this vile hatred of America and the West as the new “Edom/Rome” is extolled and not repudiated by these self-appointed defenders of “Western civilization”. Many Zionist voices have become more open brazen in their supremacism since Oct. 7, 2023, asserting that the Jews – they speak in terms of a collective group, organizing as such (and no, obviously not all Jews) whereas others who simply point that out are blood libeled as “anti-Semitic” – are at the center of “Western civilization,” that the prosperity and welfare of the latter rests solely on whether it continues to support Israel. Those who criticize Israel and want to reclaim their own sovereignty or economic self-interest are libeled as “Nazi” – dehumanizing people and inviting to murder; these Zionists scream “blood libel” but every accusation is a confession.

“Conscience, justice, and rationality are in fact Jewish values,” the British Zionist writer Melanie Phillips asserted in her speech at the JNS conference in Jerusalem, April 29, 2025. “The unprecedented onslaught against the Jews has occurred because the Jews are central to Western civilisation, a society against which the West itself has so self-destructively turned. October the 7th has turbocharged the West's decades-long process of cultural suicide. What should the Jews do about it? We need to learn as a Jewish community, to move from defence to offence, from the back foot to the front foot.” “Anyone supporting the Palestinian cause is supporting Nazi-style demonisation of the Jews, ethnic cleansing and genocide. And that applies to every Western liberal.” “The West is itself gripped by a cultural death wish. The Western culture that stands against the Jews is going down. The West will survive only if it decides to love itself. And if it decides to love us, the Jewish people, instead of disdaining us and trying to erase what makes the Jewish people special and what’s made the West special too. This is the Jewish moment. Israel understands this. Much of the Arab world has come to understand this too [Abraham Accords]. Now its time for the West and for diaspora Jews to understand as well.”

In a statement published in January 2021, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, Chief Rabbi of Safed and member of the Chief Rabbinate Council, referred to how “the US descending from the stage of world history.” He drew comparisons with the Egyptian, Roman, Ottoman, Russian, British, and French Empires, “due to a failure of values that led to their demise as well as a decline in their great power as world leaders.” The West would be replaced by Israel: “We’ve been called upon to fill this vacuum. There are problems inside the State of Israel as well, but unlike Europe, Israel leads the world in the stability of family values.” “As far as governmental stability is concerned, we are not similar in any way. There cannot be an antigovernmental revolution in Israel. With all the allegations we have regarding this and that corruption in the system of government, none of us have aspirations of a military revolt. We all recall the heavy price of the destruction of the 2nd Temple and it can’t be repeated.” “Israel is stable and is called upon to take its place as a world leader in values.”

Tamir Kreisman, who teaches the Torah via ‘The Tent of Abraham,’ said the “rise” of Israel can only come with the “downfall” of America: “When Edom, Rome, is built, Jerusalem cannot be built and vice versa. They have no place in the world together.(8) And so, since we do not have, what are the three things? [Something in Hebrew], establishment of the House of David, King Moshiach, and Beyt HaMikdash, Jerusalem is not built and therefore Rome must be built somewhere. It is the world system today: America, the New Rome. Whenever we see 'evil kingdom' in the Talmud, its always Rome. Europe was, or is, Esav, Edom. Today Edom is America as well. Rome didn't die. Neither did Nazi Germany. They have the golden eagle. It started with Rome, continuing with the Nazis. Who's got the golden eagle today? The land of the free and the home of the brave? Nazis didn't die, Romans didn't die, they just changed their look, they rebranded themselves becoming more socially acceptable. America is Edom. We are currently in Galut [exile] Edom right now and we are dealing with them or god is dealing with them, and don't worry, they will be dealt with when Israel rises.”

He gloats about an alleged worldwide destruction in another video lecture: “Everything in creation, from beginning to end, is all about Israel, and it's all for Israel. So far that there is Rome and there is the Western world, the kingdom of god cannot stand. The temple cannot be built. So, what has to happen before the temple is built? Worldwide destruction.” “Every country, every government, every institution, and any establishment, any and every establishment, must absolutely be destroyed and demolished before the coming of Mashiach. The world, as we know it, is over.” “In the end of days, god is going to completely clean house, and all the idolatry and the idol worshipers will be completely removed from existence.”








America as the “New Rome” and the Hyperstition of Edom

Netanyahu’s press office recently posted a video of Netanyahu telling a journalist he’s currently reading Barry Strauss’ book, Jews vs. Rome: Two Centuries of Rebellion Against the World's Mightiest Empire (2025). “What made you pick it up?” – “Well, we lost that one. I think we have to win the next one,” followed by a smirk. The author has boasted about the mention. That Netanyahu views this as connected to America was previously confirmed during a March 21, 2019 press conference with Trump’s first Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo (a Christian Zionist fanatic). “The last time Pompeo visited Jerusalem didn't end that well,” making a pun with the Roman general Pompey’s conquest of Judea in 63 BCE. Netanyahu continued: “But this is a different time. Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values, with a great tragedy for the Jewish people. But the new Rome, the United States, views itself as a new Jerusalem.”

He clearly views America as an enemy, to be subverted and crumbled to prop up his State and fight its wars. This psychopath has referenced his own “historic and spiritual mission” and infamously met with the Lubavitcher rebbe, who commanded him to “hasten the messiah”. Netanyahu often uses messianic terms of “blessings and curses” to refer to regional powers, and his lifelong obsession against Iran evokes themes from Jewish eschatology (where Iran is called Paras, or Persia”). There are many videos by various rabbis (some of whom I cite in this article) publicly available, calling Netanyahu a “preparatory” figure laying the groundwork for moshiach and rebuilding the Temple, while Trump is viewed as an “Edomite” dupe expected to ultimately cede spiritual authority to Netanyahu; the tradition of two Moshiach ben Josephs, one for the Jews and one for the Gentiles - both seen as preparing for the Moshiach ben David.(9) Indeed, Trump continuously boasts that no other president has done so much for Israel as him. Knowing Trump is even more subservient to anyone flattering him, they rewarded him a messianic crown and Israel's highest award.

In April 2025, Los Angeles Rabbi Reuven Wolf said this year marks “completing the tikkun of this lowly world, which concludes with the tikkun of Esav, fixing Esav. At the last moments, we're holding right now when the kingship and the power is going to be given from Esav back to the Jewish people, back to Yaakov. Now Esav is referred to in the Torah as the animal, as the pig. Because in Hebrew, the pig is called chazir. Chazir [also] means to return. The Midrash says one of the reasons he's referred to as a pig is because he's going to take the crown and he's going to give it back. They're the ones that are going to bring the crown back to the Jewish people. That means the power of leadership is going to go back to Israel.” “The last king of Edom is going to fix everything, and he's going to lift it up, the whole Edom, and the exile itself is going to become an empowerment for redemption. What's the whole point of exile? Really, Jewish people represent god's kingship in this world. Through Israel, the entire world will be enlightened, the entire world will be elevated. And god's kingship will come through Moshiach. The only reason we go to exile is to fix, just like Yaakov we go into the territories of the nations, is to fix them. Once the fixing is completed, then Edom has to secede its power to the Jewish people.”

“It’s all in a state of surrender towards the god of Israel and to the King of Israel, which is Moshiach. Netanyahu is not moshiach in any way, shape or form. But he represents now the Jewish force in the land of Israel. Netanyahu, Trump giving the key to him, that's awesome. Edom's gonna continue, but now they're operating already in subservience to Israel, to the Jewish people, and to help the rebuilding of the Third Temple. Once Moshiach's crown is revealed as Moshiach's kingdom, the Jewish kingdom is beginning to get up already. Israel is rising. Once that happens, Edom falls.” “America will go down in eternal history as the ones that paved the way for the return of the Kingdom of David, the ones that assisted. I believe Donald Trump will go down in history as an eternal hero, for his role that he's playing. When Esav is being taken down, since Esav is such a power, when Esav is being taken down, the entire world is unraveled. That's what's causing all this tension and all the craziness. Its the take down of Esav and the rising of Yaakov.” 

“I wanna make a warning to American Gentiles,” Hebron settler spokesman Yishai Fleisher said in an interview on Nov. 17. “The minute your country is taken over by Antisemitism, the minute you start to be a country that's not blessing Israel but cursing Israel, you have begun the process of shrinking away from your Empire. I don't think that's theological - that's biological, that's the way the world operates. Every empire that turned on the Jewish people shrank back to its smallness.” “The Jews bring the power.” “We will survive when we're kicked out of America and America, the whole thing is done. Within a span of a few hundred years, we went from Babylonian to the Persian to the Greek and the Roman Empire. We're still here.”






Without any sense of irony, Fleisher admits Zionism relies on the power of Empires to prop up its state while still asserting its “uniqueness” vis a vis the Nations. We can cite here first the British Empire’s role in the early founding of Israel, via the Balfour Declaration and financiers like the Rothschilds and Montefiore who financed the earliest Zionist rabbis and colonies in Palestine; the ungrateful Fleisher told “English” (Israeli) Defence League puppet “Tommy Robinson” that the British “have a special place in hellfor holding on to the Mandate after WWII. Second is the American Empire, presided over by Corporate war profiteers closely intertwined with Israel. Yet Fleisher boasted of the threat of subversion if those Empires ceased their usefulness to Israel, which indeed has been keeping its options open with long-established economic, military, technological, and espionage links with Putinist Russia, China, and Hindutva India.(10) 

Following this same line, Zionist “comedian” Roseanne Barr said: “I don’t know that if America’s turning on Israel, then America deserves what’s going to happen to them for it.” The interviewer quipped, “It’ll be worse for America than Israel,” to which she replied: “It will, because Israel will just move on to India and other countries.” This alleged “American” has been platformed by right-dialectic controlled op (most notably Alex Jones, who speaks just enough truth mixed with psyops and false framing to herd back into the Zionist/Globalist plantation), where she routinely spews Kabbalistic disinfo about a “Satanic” conspiracy centered in “Rome” (to normalize the “Edom” genetic bogeyman) and other “chosen” supremacist hypocrisy. Her mention of a rising India in alliance with Israel is pertinent given Trump’s expansion of H1-B workers from China and India, aligned with his Technocrat billionaire friends against his own base. The American hi-tech sector is subverted by Israeli Unit 8200 and the Technocrat oligarchs have their own connections with Israel, so more tech workers from countries with close links to Israel serves those common interests. 

On a spiritual level there has been an ongoing evolving of Hinduism into Noahide compliance, away from polytheism and towards monotheism similar to the process that subverted Rome. Technocracy itself is welcomed as fulfilling a messianic “prophecy purportedly made by the Gaon of Vilna and then propagated by Zionist rabbis who viewed it within their eschatology of Noahide nations subjugated to Jerusalem. For decades a handful of US-based tech oligarchs have built up and funded Israeli tech, rapidly expanded via Netanyahu’s pet project of making Israel a global “cyber power”. Silicon Valley tech firms have outsourced an increasing amount of their operations into Israel and one of the focus of Mossad’s operations within the US (from Jonathan Pollard onward) is the theft of American scientific and tech knowledge that was then shared or traded with China or Russia, all part of this broader subversion that ultimately wants to replace the United States with this dialectical “multipolar” alliance.      

In that same interview, Fleisher asserted rising “anti-Semitism” in the United States meant that the “Jewish people being called back to the homeland.” Raising this bogeyman has been an obsession these past few years, causing them to even act in self-destructive ways where even the optics no longer matter to those drunk on their own authority. Alongside this is an increased push towards aliyah to Israel, repeated by several rabbis and Zionist advocates to desperately stem the tide of their own decline (even while gloating about the declining West) which has manifested in growing numbers of Israelis emigrating to other countries. A new narrative has also been pushed that Israel doesn’t “need” US aid (even while they never actually want it cut off), with Netanyahu saying Israel should be “weaned off” that aid. That “aid” will continue through other means in this public-private partnership (institutions already subverted by this Zionist-Technocratic oligarchy), in a similar way many Interventionists have transitioned to a new phase where they can speak against “regime change” and “boots on the ground”  because the face of war itself has changed into an AI war technocracy. 

Fleisher repeats the same line as Christian Zionists about a nation’s prosperity depending on whether or not it “blesses” Israel, meaning both types of these Abrahamic messianists revel and gloat about America's decline. Yet one can strongly argue Spain only experienced its Golden Age (as opposed to the false convivencia of Moorish occupiers and their fifth column) after the Alhambra Decree of 1492. To bring it to our present reality, the United States has actually declined the more “our” political elites continue to serve Israel. This support has been to the detriment of truly American interests, with “our” political elites imposing more debt, taxes, and a lower standard of living upon Americans while doubling down on propping up the Israeli Warfare/Welfare State (and lining their own Corporatist pockets in the meanwhile). I would argue this is all by design, with an “accelerationist” phase where these foreign interests combined with the domestic Judeo-supremacist billionaire class and Technocrats are looting the nation for all they can while everyday life only becomes harder for most Americans in this epitome of Imperial boomerang.

It serves these supremacist interests to fear-monger about “anti-Semitism,” conflating that projected blood libel against millions of people who merely want to stand up for Palestinian human rights, American sovereignty, or their own economic self-interests over subservience to Israel, etc. … not only to garner sympathy for their own political agenda, or to try and herd millions of individual Jews into yielding their own individual power to this collective authority class (on display at the 2025 Tikvah Jewish Leadership Conference, where they openly spoke about indoctrinating even their own) but to “activate” a Hyperstitious hive-mind carrying out alleged supernatural “prophecies” where the “rise” of Israel is contingent on the decline and fall of “Edom”, the ancient Rome which morphed into the broader West and particularly the United States. Although fictitious, contradicting all recorded history outside Biblical stories, and the reality that our ancestors as European nations were tribes from the Eurasian Steppes and not the Levant, the “Edom” fable is rooted in an alleged dispute between two brothers, the “moral” of which is only the vilest supremacist delusions.  



The Torah/Old Testament is filled with such supremacist
delusions written by mortal hands many centuries after the
alleged events they describe. The explanation is Hyperstition
and material actions, not a "supernatural" source. Yet billions
from "the Nations" extol the same book that calls for their own
destruction. While millions of Jews are similarly manipulated
by a rabbinic/financial elite to see themselves as "chosen" and
prone to such "prophecies" even if they aren't aware of these.



“Jacob went on to father the Jewish nation, and Esau became the progenitor of Se'ir, the forerunner of Rome,” asserts Chabad cultist Shlomo Chaim Kesselman. “One had a righteous disposition while the other had an evil, idolatrous one. Each would father a great nation, a world superpower. They would fight tooth and nail, but ultimately, Shem prophesied, the younger son [Jacob] would triumph.” “The elder will serve the younger.” “Ultimately, though, Jacob would triumph and would have mastery over Esau and all his descendants.” In his compendium of Midrashic texts, Rabbi Louis Ginzberg cited one relevant tradition: “Esau will vaunt lords, while Jacob will bring forth prophets, and if Esau has princes, Jacob will have kings. They, Israel and Rome, are the two nations destined to be hated by all the world. One will exceed the other in strength. First Esau will subjugate the whole world, but in the end Jacob will rule over all.”

Rabbi Alon Anava said in a video lecture: “The United States has no future. That's it. There's no other way of explaining it. Edom, which is America, is going to be destroyed. You'll see the destruction of Edom. The United States of America is destined to crash, miserably. What matters is that the land of Edom, the United States, is going to be destroyed and it's going to start with economy, and then its going to lead after that to many other things. At the end of the day, Hashem is the one who is going to control everything, and it doesn't matter who he's going to put at the head of the United States to bring it down. It doesn't matter. America is going to be destroyed. America is going down, and that will bring the destruction of everything, the entire Western world, because America is the one who's pulling the wagon, and Hashem is going to cause that.” 

In his Hannukah 2020 lecture, Israeli-born, New York-based Sephardic Hasidic Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi (whose general tone is quite blunt and honest, saying the “quiet parts” out-loud) said @30:01 if the Jews didn’t follow “blessings and rules,” their god would “send a nation from far away that their sign is an eagle and they will be very cruel that you will not recognize their language, meaning its not one of your neighbors and the people around Israel their sign was not an eagle. The Romans, from Italy. The Roman Empire their sign was an eagle, the Nazis were eagle, the Russians are eagle, the Americans are eagle. All the empires are eagle. Why? Because they're all children of Esav. Its all the same family.”

Referring to America, Mizrachi says @231:45 – “Hashem is finished with this place. Because remember every empire was an empire for an x amount of time, usually 200 years and change.” He then cites ancient Rome, Greece, and Babylonia; modern Iran, Germany, and Britain as examples of empires that “ended” because of no longer “blessing” Jews – what this is actually about is reading a religio-supremacist worldview into the natural cycles of history; Abrahamic historiography is generally linear but will concede to the cyclical view although ascribing it to their deity. @232:44: “Everyone of these empires go one by one, nothing left from them. Same thing with America. Why empires rise and collapse? It all connects to the Jews. The Jews run the show in the world. In the Torah it says that in every nation you will be, you will always be the highlight of the place.” He then concludes this point @2:35:47 – “Once we will leave this place, Hashem will bury America.”

“Esav is the father of Edom, the Edomites and there are a lot of nations in the world that belong to Edom,” said the Los Angeles Rabbi Elyahu Kin. “The Roman Empire is all Edom. Edom includes most of Europe. It includes the United States of America, the Roman Empire that was never destroyed.” “Edom is scattered over many other nations today that speak Latin languages, that have some of the Roman Empire including America, they are first. So Edom is everywhere. The United States of America is also part of it.” “Esav will eventually give birth to Amalek, not directly but eventually. And that Amalek has the greatest concentration of evil in the world. We have a special mitzvah fighting Amalek, of destroying Amalek, of eradicating him completely, which of course will never be done completely until Mashiach comes and Hashem does it. But in the meantime why do we have this mitzvah? In order that we continuously remember that he is opposed to whatever we are doing. Whatever Am Yisrael, whatever the Jewish nation is supposed to do, whatever their mission is, Amalek is there to oppose it.”

He continues in that same lecture: “Rabbis tell us that there will be a nation in the world right before Mashiach comes that we will be able to recognize from their character and their behavior who he is. The answer is very clear - it's Germany. Commentaries talk about how the concentration of Amalek is mostly in that country. Does it come as a surprise, no you can see for yourself what they did and what they're capable of doing. But there is Amalek all over the world. Amalek is everywhere.”(11) He then describes a “Gog Magog war” with “an assembly of nations coming against the Jews right before Mashiach,” “the Assembly that Hashem is putting together of all the evil sparks that are scattered all over the world, in all these nations that contain Amalek. To destroy them and completely eliminate them once and for all.”

The “evil sparks” refers to the Kabbalistic doctrine of the world having “shattered” into an infinite kelipot “broken shards” at inception. I gave a brief description of this doctrine in my Technocratic Noahidism article, and a lengthier critique from a Pagan/Animistic and Gnosis perspective in Part 4 of my 2022 spiritual manifesto, as these doctrines have infiltrated the trends that speak about Earth being a “simulation” and present a false world-denying dualistic cosmology. These Kabbalists claim the Gentiles are kelipot, while the Jews are extolled as scattered “divine sparks” with a special mandate to “repair the world” (tikkun olam). When the likes of Hammer, Shapiro, and Wolicki assert their “chosen” status and that Western civilization is allegedly “rooted” within their own tradition, they are tikkun olam supremacists subverting the same West and America they claim to be defending, while messianism by its very nature is Globalist. Those holding to any Abrahamic messianism (including in its secular political iterations) is opposing the real foundations of Western civilization.

[To be continued.....]






Footnotes:

(1) Sayan (pl. sayanim) “helpers” are volunteers Mossad can rely upon at any given time. They are people fully indoctrinated into serving Israel first and above even their “native” countries. Ideology and not money is their motivation. These Mossad sleeper cells were first exposed by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky in By Way of Deception (1990) and expanded upon by the French-Jewish writer Jacob Cohen, who wrote a book on the subject in 2010. They speak in terms of “activation,” which makes sense of why so many sayanim seemed to be activated after 7th Oct. 2023, how so many came out of apparent obscurity into becoming fulltime Israeli propagandists.

Incidentally, Newsweek is now owned by two individuals – Dev Prasad and Johnathan Davis – with close ties with the evangelical Moonie cult. This cult has a long history of supporting Israel as one of their fundamental religious tenets. Prasad and his other editor-in-chief have met with Israeli ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, a leading proponent of globally suppressing dissent against Israel.

(2) Which isn’t to deny the political elements of those other Abrahamic faiths. In Europe, there is the rise of Islamization via the millions of migrants, aided and abetted by politicians and various NGOs who hate anything indigenous European. This is an engineered “cultural domination” also related to the cycle of wars for Greater Israel and then mass migrations, to empty out those lands coveted by Zionist fanatics, use them to bring chaos and division to Europe which they view as fulfilling “prophecies”, and create more pressures for “aliyah” while “Esau” and “Ishmael” fight each other within this broader messianic hyperstition. In the United States, the greater threat is Christian Nationalism which has especially been merging with a Technocratic element. Many who oppose one or the other should beware of falling into a dialectic, circling back into alignment with Israel or otherwise deflecting from the role of Zionism and Noahidism.

(3) “Higher civilisations are not simply regions of the planet, they are different planets entirely. Much like our own in Europe, Chinese, Indian, Muslim, Native American, and Hispano-American civilisations all have roots that reach back into time immemorial. These roots often dig deep into the depths of pre-history itself. They rest upon specific traditions that are passed down through the ages in ever-changing forms. These are composed of spiritual values that build behaviours and nurture representations. If, for example, sexuality is universal in the same manner as eating, love is then different for each civilisation, as are representations of femininity, cuisine, architecture, the visual arts, and music. These all reflect a spiritual morphology, transmitted as much through atavism as through experience. These features make us who we are, unlike any other. They constitute our perennial tradition, our unique way of being men and women in the face of life, death, love, history, and fate. Without them we are fated to become nothing; to disappear into chaos, and into the chaos of a world dominated by others. Fortunately, our tradition survives in our subconscious, despite having been forgotten due to old divisions that have shattered our memory, a memory further scarred by the delusive belief in our universal mission. A belief that is dangerously wrong.” (Dominique Venner, The Shock of History: Religion, Memory, Identity, London: Arktos, 2015, p. 2)

“More wrong than even Samuel Huntington could have imagined. It denies and destroys other cultures and civilisations, specifically those that threaten the universalist values said to be ‘Western’, that in reality exist simply for the benefit of globalising markets and ‘democracy’…This universalist belief is also dangerous for those of us in Europe. It stunts our ability to comprehend that other men do not feel, think, or live the same way we do. It is dangerous because it acts destructively upon our own identity. After having colonised other peoples in the name of universalism, Europeans are now in the process of being colonised in the name of the very same principle against which they do not know how to defend themselves: if all men are brothers, nothing can stop the arrival of others on our doorstep.” (ibid., pp. 2-3)

(4) Witness Heritage Foundation leader Kevin Roberts’ recent groveling before his donors after he merely said he wouldn’t “cancel” Tucker Carlson. Yet another example of the power of these Techno-Zionist oligarchs, around whom the likes of Roberts choose to subject themselves by their own recycling of Milton Friedman’s “Reaganomics” dogma through which the Managerial State/Oligarchy destroys the free market while pretending to promote those principles. It’s the unbridled worship of “money” and “progress” that opens the door to mental cucking before oligarch altars. 

(5) While he should be recognized for helping to move the Overton Window about Israel and wars, he still makes 5D chess excuses for Trump and promoted disinfo (whether deliberately or naivete) about the Zionist Steve Witkoff’s alleged “good faith” in negotiations, despite all evidence to the contrary it was always designed to neutralize Israel’s enemies. Carlson promotes certain politicians who try to walk a line against “the Neocons” while still being pro-Israel, including Joe Kent, Steve Toth, and JD Vance. Carlson also makes many shows scapegoating Paganism (which he conflates with “Satanism”) and “Gnosticism” for the ills in society, revealing appalling ignorance about the Occult and pre-Abrahamic faith traditions. So in these ways he promotes narratives that enable the very same forces he criticizes. Nevertheless, the ongoing Zionist meltdown against him reveal more about the Archetypal forces within the American undercurrent he personifies, so its not just about Tucker Carlson the individual.

(6) In his book, Hammer evokes the Maccabean war against the Seleucid Greeks as his model for how his fellow Zionist Jews are to act in the world: “Always be a Maccabee, and always be proud and authentic representatives of the broader nation of Israel.” Broader meaning an expansionist state beyond its borders, with subversives identifying with its nationhood even within other countries. This archetypal war is considered a foundation of “Judeo-Christian Western civilization,” which isn’t surprising since this supremacist argues for the “primacy” of Jerusalem over Athens. Yet pro-Israel cucks like Dinesh D’Souza and Jordan Peterson lap it all up while pretending to fight for “the West.”

This spiritual hatred of Hellenismos is also expressed by Rabbi Menashe Bleiweiss, who speaks of how “Greek culture still controls the Western world,” presenting it all as hedonistic and ignoring the ethics and morals pioneered by this tradition that loved Wisdom (philosophia). He projects the jealousy of his own insecure god who “destroyed” entire nations for their alleged “offenses” despite claiming to “create” them – and demanded sacrifices and burnt offerings – upon the elaborate Greek Pantheon, with its truly balanced approach to the Divine. His criticisms of the Pagan world and false framing of its Ideals are similar to those repeated by Christian and Islamic scholars and apologists, whose religions all destroyed Pagan cultures so they could impose worship of the jealous god of Israel. They all have appropriated much of their own ideals and concepts from Pagan cultures while demonizing and projecting against them. 

Bleiweiss expresses alarm that many ancient Hebrews found Hellenism appealing - perhaps an instinctive memory of their own polytheistic origins indistinguishable from other Levantine pantheons. This was obviously a threat to the rabbinical and kingly elite, which is also why bands of Zealots and Zadikites rebelled across the Greco-Roman world (Palestine, Cyrenaica, Cyprus, Alexandria, etc.), as much against all the Hellene represented as to reestablish the rabbinic/Davidic authority over their own communities.

(7) Venner, op. cit., pp. 19-20.

(8) This is a direct reference to the Talmud, Megillah 6a: “The Sages said that the fortunes of Caesarea, which represents Rome, and Jerusalem are diametric opposites. If, therefore, someone says to you that both cities are destroyed, do not believe him. Similarly, if he says to you that they are both settled in tranquility, do not believe him. If, however, he says to you that Caesarea is destroyed and Jerusalem is settled, or that Jerusalem is destroyed and Caesarea is settled, believe him. As it is stated: ‘Because Tyre has said against Jerusalem: Aha, the gates of the people have been broken; she is turned to me; I shall be filled with her that is laid waste’ (Ezekiel 26:2), and Tyre, like Caesarea, represents Rome. Consequently, the verse indicates that if this city is filled, that one is laid waste, and if that city is filled, this one is laid waste. The two cities cannot coexist.” … Caesarea, being a “Gentile” city populated by Hellenes and Romans, becomes an allegory for “Rome” and European civilization itself, especially within the “Edom Galut” (exile among the “Edomites”) where these books were transmitted.

(9) For more, see the work of Christopher Jon Bjerknes, who extensively cites various Jewish scriptures including the Zohar. There are also many public videos of rabbis teaching this tradition of two “Moshiachs ben Yosef”, see especially lectures by Rabbi Mendel Kessin on “The Messianic Significance of Trump” and “Purification of America in the End of Days”. This ties into the various awards and honors Trump received spanning a decade, including from the Sanhedrin which called him a new “Cyrus”. Trump has extensive connections to Chabad, which I documented in February 2017. These have only expanded since and so I documented those updated links and cited rabbis who praise him as a “messianic” figure meant to usher in Noahide Laws upon “Edom”.  

(10) Contrary to the Putin shills, Duginist subversives, and BRICS apologists who have captured a lot of the anti-Zionist discourse in American alt-media – while the actual powers behind those empires are reliably allied with Israel. They are prone to make bombastic geopolitical predictions that prove false again and again, lying to their audiences into a false “hope”. I documented extensive links between Israel and Putin’s Russia in a series of articles back in 2017/2018, including on Dugin’s Kabbalism, exposes of his Kahanist sidekick Avigdor Eskin and Putin’s Zionist propagandist Boris Spiegel, and Russian/Israeli collusion in Syria – the latter only too prescient with Assad’s overthrow. There are also many Putinist/Duginist subversives who have infiltrated American libertarian and separatist groups, revealing their stance against Statism and Empire extends only to the American. Principles and consistency should be our hallmark, not unprincipled grifting mouthpieces of foreign Statists.

(11) Amalek has been most frequently evoked against the Palestinians, but also against Germans and Iranians. Similar to Kin is Rabbi Alon Anava, whose lecture already cited in this current article also speaks of how “the forces of evil are descendants of Esav.” “The lineage of Esav ends up in Germania, in Germany. Track the lineage of the so-called Aryan race in Germany to Esav. They spread around, later on into Persia, to Iran.” “The control of evil in this world right now is by the descendants of Esav.” These words, combined with the equation of “Edom” with “Rome”, reveals a special hatred of Indo-Europeans (among whom many forget can also be counted Iranians). And these genocidal fantasies of “Amalek” predated either the rise of Hitler and the Nazis in Germany, or Shi’ite theocracy in Iran. Just as the rabbinical sources that speak about Rome describe it in “genetic” terms, regardless if it continued to hold to its Pagan roots or later morphed into Christian.  

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Analysis of the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Cui Bono? A Cultural and Political Overview (Part 2)

by Sean Jobst

15 October 2025

(Continued from Part 1)





The Overton Window has shifted so much towards Israel and the Zionist stranglehold upon the USA that Mileikowsky, the genocidal psychopath otherwise known as Netanyahu, took a break from the seven-front terrorism campaign for a Greater Israel to deny responsibility for Charlie Kirk's assassination thrice. Who goes out of their way to deny responsibility for a crime, especially one whose suspect(s) and basic details aren't even known at the time? A medieval Latin law principle definitely applies here: “Excusatio non petita, accusation manifesta” (Unsolicited excuse, manifest accusation), i.e. “He who excuses himself accuses himself.” We can also paraphrase Hamlet (Act III, Scene II): “The psychopath doth protest too much, me thinks.” Every accusation Mileikowsky has projected upon others is an admission of his own actions and those of the Zionist warlord and billionaire class.

Perhaps leaning in to the kabbalistic numerology of 24 and what he previously termed his messianic “mission”(1), he evoked 9/11 on its 24th year to justify bombing Qatar, not only to assassinate Hamas negotiators but also to further reinforce the dialectic where American opponents of Israel are called “Qatari agents” even while his own government has special financial deals with Qatar - for that is how a dialectic works. Then only minutes after Kirk was assassinated, Netanyahu recycled his 24-year-old reaction to 9/11 - “It’s very good. It will generate immediate sympathy for Israel”(2) – by seeing this latest opportunity to co-opt for Israel: “Charlie Kirk was murdered for speaking truth and defending freedom. A lion-hearted friend of Israel, he fought the lies and stood tall for Judeo-Christian civilization.” 

Professing his alleged closeness to Kirk in such over-the-top terms is itself suspicious (and will be a recurring theme by the various Zionists cited throughout this article), as its known within criminal justice that most murders are committed by an acquaintance, "friend," or business associate. Because a psychopath lacks even the capacity for insight (further reinforced through a sense of being part of a people “chosen” over all other nations), Netanyahu couldn't help but deflect attention lest Americans forget how he views this nation as an instrument to be “easily moved”. So even while scoffing at “conspiracy theorists” suspecting Israeli involvement, he made his own presumptions in a Fox News interview where he ascribed blame to “radical Islamists and their union with the ultra-progressives.” 

Raising such a bogeyman is designed to serve a domestic agenda of ramping up even more crackdowns on Americans' free speech, while entangling the US into wars against Iran and other competitors to Greater Israel. A couple of hours earlier he spoke to Newsmax, whose CEO was honored by the Zionist Organization of America for his service to Israel. In that fawning interview (where the American interviewer wore a yellow ribbon pin aligned to this foreign nation), Netanyahu made the same denials with hyperbolic deflection, seemed to “know” the motive before any others, and even threw in “Nazi” references (foreshadowing his “Woke Reich” libel only two weeks later)

“That's insane. That's insane. Israel also changes the orbit of the moon. Israel pushes the sun. I mean, the whole thing is, it's not only insane. It's so absurd, so stupid, so ridiculous. When you hate Jews, when you hate the Jewish state, you're willing to say anything and promote all these absurd rumors. Over the centuries, especially in the Middle Ages, the horrific Middle Ages, the worst things were said about Jews, you couldn't possibly believe. We were poisoning the wells. We were drinking the blood of Christian children, you name it. I mean, these things that continued actually up to the Holocaust.

“The Nazis said the same thing. You know, we're carrying vermin, we're spreading disease, and people believed it. And every time they believed it, this was a prelude to a greater and greater massacre, culminating with the worst massacre of them all, the Holocaust. Well, since then, we've learned when people spread these lies about us, prepare yourself for the assault. And, you know, they're trying to delegitimize the state of Israel. I'll tell you one thing, we're fighting on the battlefield against the terrorists and winning. And [Kirk] was fighting in the battlefield of ideas, and I think he was winning. He was going to win. That's why they shot him. I hope they don't silence him.”

Joining him in this chorus was former Mossad chief Yossi Cohen, who has been platformed by international media while his predecessors lurked in the shadows – a sign of Israel's growing desperation in its going-for-broke phase. When Australian Zionist propagandist Erin Molan asked him about the Kirk assassination on 18th Sept., Cohen responded: “No, we’re not involved in political assassinations, we never were.” Five days later he repeated that denial in an interview by Bari Weiss, AIPAC nepo baby whom the Ellisons astroturfed as their Z.E.I. hire overseeing CBS.(3) Responding to a question about Epstein, Cohen went out of his way to deny responsibility for the Kirk assassination: “People believe that Mossad created the tsunami. People believe, just right now, that we were behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination. False. We don’t do that, we never will, we never did.”

This denial of any assassination is more insane given that the State of Israel has committed hundreds of political assassinations going back to the earliest days of its foundations (such as Swedish UN peace negotiator Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948 and likely an Egyptian scientist in California in 1952) up to assassinating Hamas negotiators in Qatar on 9th Sept 2025. Announcing the latter, Israeli “Defense” Minister Israel Katz issued a threat to assassinate anyone, anywhere in the world, whom Israel determined was an enemy: “Israel’s security doctrine is clear - its long arm will act against its enemies everywhere. There’s nowhere they can hide.”



Coordinated response?


What about the ‘letter’? 

In the Fox News interview, Mileikowsky waved around a letter Kirk purportedly wrote him on 2nd May, quoting him: “One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization.” By not showing the contents and only cherry-picking one alleged quote is a lie by omission. Only after more people began suspecting Israel (despite all his denials and the old libel of “anti-Semite” losing its bludgeon) did the zionist New York Post publish the alleged letter on 29th September. Yet it merely proves what we already know: Charlie Kirk came from a Christian Zionist background where support for Israel was taken for granted. For him to even cite a “need” for better optics itself affirms that Israel is committing crimes he could no longer justify, without denying he still broadly held to a pro-Israel worldview.

The letter's tone demonstrated Kirk's growing fatigue with Israel - facing so many students' questions about the Mideast in contrast to the domestic issues that were clearly his increasing focus - and that he wanted Israel to lead its own propaganda campaign instead of relying on him as their primary “surrogate”. Citing a letter from May ignores the acceleration of events over the next three months that led Kirk to make apparent shifts more aligned to the growing Israel skepticism of his grassroots supporters, while resisting the ruthless pressure campaign by Zionist billionaire donors like Bill Ackman and Robert Shillman – his public opposition to war against Iran in June, platforming Israel critics like Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith at his July conference, the Hamptons “intervention” by Ackman and his astroturfed shills in August, followed by Kirk’s visible anger at being called an “anti-Semite” whose very “moral character” was called in question by Zionist donors, up to his asking questions about Israel on his own show to a shocked Ben Shapiro just the day before his assassination.

Netanyahu mentioned his invitation for Kirk to visit Israel but again lied by omitting how the American turned down this obvious re-education tour and $150 million funding offer. This was confirmed by Kirk’s spokesman and executive producer Andrew Kolvet – who certainly differs from what Owens and other Israel critics have said, but nonetheless corroborates Kirk’s turning down any “foreign funding” (which doesn’t account for domestic funding by pro-Israel billionaires) and his developing a “nuanced view” on Israel. What the story reveals is a push-and-pull struggle between the growing discontent of his own base, the focus upon Israel while he wanted to increasingly focus on domestic issues, and the pressure of Zionist billionaires as well as Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, who ingratiated himself as Kirk’s hasbara coach to ensure compliance with Israel.(4) 

Another proof calling the “letter” into question is how another hasbara coach, Josh Hammer, said nothing about the letter until Sept. 29, even while claiming “I was given access to this letter a few months ago. I read it at that time.” Yet he never brought up this letter in his various media rounds where he was criticizing “Tucker, Candace, and other bad-faith actors” who questioned the Zionist narrative about Kirk. One would think he would cite such presumably strong evidence for his cause yet never brought it up. This leads to two possibilities: Either he lied about even knowing about the letter, or it was something manufactured by Zionist propagandists after the assassination. In any case, I’ll cite much more on Hammer in Part 3. 





Focus group challenges Israel-First dogma ... (and Some of My Commentary on the Israel Dialectic in the West)

Growing Israel skepticism among the TPUSA grassroots was expressed in a focus group on 26th July. The video, entitled “AM I ANTISEMITIC?! — 25 Gen Z Students + Charlie Kirk Discuss Israel, Netanyahu, Gaza, AIPAC,” began with a montage of anti-Zionist voices (accurately) calling Kirk biased towards Israel, followed by some Zionists accusing him of being “anti-Semitic”. The increased frequency and aggressiveness of the latter was clearly affecting Kirk, so that based on his personality he became more opened to question Israel, albeit very cautiously and with many caveats due to his lifelong Christian Zionist leanings and funders. Nevertheless, the clip reveals internal shifts combined with the students expressing concerns that were clearly shared by him. Throughout the focus group, he alluded to the pressures from his Zionist donors and their aggressive tactics in squashing even the slightest disagreements. 

Kirk opened the discussion criticizing how Ted Cruz and others use Biblical verses to justify their own support for Israel, with the ice broken by one young Jewish convert to Catholicism who said he had concerns about AIPAC. Kirk then said, “I’m told by some people that if I criticize AIPAC, I’m ‘anti-Semitic.’” Other students agreed there is a “higher prioritization” of Israel over American interests. Another shared his view that “prophecy as policy is problematic.” Kolvet asked the focus group what they associated with the word “Gaza”, and they replied about the obvious loss of human life, to which Kirk asked if there was also a focus on “the hostages.” Of course, nothing was said about the thousands of civilian Palestinian hostages (reframed as “prisoners” by the media); how 7th October 2023 was not some “Year Zero” arising from nowhere; that Netanyahu rejected every previous deal to release hostages; or the Hannibal Directive which saw the Israeli military killing many of its own civilians as matter of policy.

Next, we get to the crux of Kirk’s increasing pivot towards domestic issues: “How many of you get the impression that Israel matters more than having young people being able to own homes?” They unanimously agreed how Israel-First was harming these domestic concerns, a fact that often gets lost within the debate. Its certainly annoying to me when many pro-Palestinian Western leftists only approach Zionism as part of their own internal struggles about “colonialism” and “white supremacy”, obscuring the reality of Zionism as a system of Judeo-supremacism and organized pressure(5) that is likewise harmful to American and European interests. Such people say little about Zionism’s role in mass migration (the side of the dialectic they support, while pro-Zionist Western rightists oppose migration but support war policies that cause that migration while blaming the migrants themselves). 

So it is that some on the American right have awakened to how support for Israel uproots even the semblance of American sovereignty, that Israel’s warfare/welfare State is propped up by American taxpayers. We can also speak about Israel’s consolidation over the US media; how tech companies filled with Israeli military intelligence Unit 8200 agents have infiltrated throughout US infrastructure and cybersecurity (as I’ve detailed with examples in many articles); the hi-tech transfer to Israel; and Israel’s intelligence, security, and geopolitical connections to China and Russia (contrary to certain anti-Zionists neutered into the “BRICS” dialectic). All of these forces of Empire are ultimately linked by the same Globalist system and its interlocking network of billionaires and bankers. 

Opposing Zionism on such grounds of subsidiarity and sovereignty are commendable, as with humanitarian concerns over how the Palestinians are dehumanized to justify genocide by this one nation made “exalted” over all other nations (and exempted de facto from the same standards as other nations). I point out this dialectic because such a balanced, holistic perspective becomes lost within these culture war distractions, where both sides miss a piece of the puzzle by staying confined within their own paradigm. We are all subjected to the same self-proclaimed elites, who shuffle the people back into these culture war distractions whenever there is the slightest organic left/right consensus about the banksters, War Machine, Israel, or releasing the Epstein files.(6) 







At this point Kirk was still grappling with his life-long pro-Israel education: “Do you see Jew-hatred increase across your generation?” The students unanimously responded it was being conflated with criticism of Israel, to which he saw his opening: “There is a rise of Jew-hate but its not the majority mover. I think the majority mover of Gen-Z and Gen-Z conservatives is exhaustion. Can we just make it where I can buy a home or deport people?” This admission itself pierced through the vicegrip of Zionist programming which conflated the two. Kirk agreed with them that the more such libels of “anti-Semitism” were leveled, the more it became a self-fulfilling prophecy. He expressed frustrations with backlash over his platforming Carlson and Smith a week before, such that even a Judeophile like himself was being accused of “anti-Semitism”. Yet this is indeed what happened with the vitriolic reactions of such Israel-First windbags as Laura Loomer:

“I don’t ever want to hear @charliekirk11 claim he is pro-Trump ever again. After this weekend, I’d say he has revealed himself as political opportunist and I have had a front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics these last 10 years. Lately, Charlie has decided to behave like a charlatan, claiming to be pro-Trump one day while he stabs Trump in the back the next. TPUSA was only able to thrive thanks to the generosity of President Trump. On the one year anniversary of the assassination attempt on Trump’s life, Charlie hosted @ComicDaveSmith at @TPUSA’s SAS conference where Dave Smith was able to speak to a bunch of conservative youth at an organization that claims to be Pro-Trump. 3 weeks ago, Dave Smith called for President Trump to be IMPEACHED and REMOVED from office over his decision to blow up Iran’s nuclear facilities. 

“Charlie played both sides of the Iran issue on his show as we all saw, because he wants to play to both sides of the aisle. The honorable thing to do is to have a position and actually defend it to the death instead of flip flopping. Smith said all of MAGA ‘should turn on Trump’ and abandon him. He said this 3 weeks ago. See the clip below. TPUSA is definitely not pro-Trump. If they were, they certainly aren’t anymore. Out of all of the incredible pro-Trump voices out there who support the President, Charlie decided to host Dave Smith? It really is shameful. And I am honestly just disgusted by the nonstop flip flopping on the right.” – Laura Loomer Tweet, 6:30 PM · Jul 13, 2025

With the focus group Kirk rejected “the binary that’s presented, that if you don’t passionately talk about it you are a hater. That’s probably destructive for everybody involved.” He then described how he was “trying to find this new path” where he could still support Israel as the place where his Christian faith arose, while also “I’m an American and I represent a generation that can’t afford anything.” “I think we need to have the prudence to reject the Jew-hate, we’re not going to put up with that, that’s dumb. But also if you call everyone an anti-Semite, if they don’t take a puritanical view of the Netanyahu government, then I think that’s bad for everybody.” He thus measured his criticism by distinguishing between Netanyahu and Israel, a similar mental gymnastics as Labor Zionists such as Bernie Sanders but is meaningless when a poll found 82% of Israelis support Netanyahu's policies in Gaza. Kirk's next comments are worth quoting as a strong glimpse into his personal growth:

“A cope that is often found in broken institutions and I found this now over 13 years, its a great truism, you guys learn it for the rest of your life. Anybody that tells you we have a messaging problem, you should go a step deeper and ask another question. Are you actually doing something wrong or are you bad at messaging it? Because people who are doing bad stuff will be like we're just not presenting it correctly. Sometimes that's true or sometimes there's might be something beneath the surface that you're not doing.” “The reason we're doing this focus group is that I've been trying to tell them [the donors?] that there's an earthquake coming on this issue and in the country. And they don't believe, so I'm like why don't you just hear it from people yourselves?” 

So he was aligning more and more with the grassroots sentiments of his student groups, whose criticisms he also saw as validating his own internal doubts. Remember the controlled environment around which Kirk founded TPUSA in 2012, when he was an impressionable teenager and with 90% funding from David Horowitz.(7) The tight control of the donors remained thereafter and intensified within the past two years. Seeing the applause that Israel critics received at TPUSA events, showed his sensitivity to the cultural pulse. Yet he failed to realize that Zionists tolerate no “middle path”, accepting nothing but subservience especially after taking their funding for so long. To even challenge the smear campaign behind “anti-Semitism” and raising questions about the prioritization of Israel over domestic concerns was enough to earn their ire which reared its ugly head up to the day he was assassinated (and afterwards with how his Zionist pressurers have exploited his death).




Ackman paling around with Chabad. His
billions as one of their oligarchs combined
with their "spiritual" guidance founded
upon a supremacist, messianic agenda.



Ackman and His Lapdog Grifters Threatened Kirk at Hamptons “Intervention”

At the beginning of August, Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman, whose various financial frauds (going back to the financial crisis of 2008 up to the Rona in 2020) I exposed in Part 1, convened an influencers' summit in the Hamptons. The summit was ostensibly to discuss the “threat” posed by Zohran Mamdani if elected New York Mayor, but as reported by Max Blumenthal on the authority of “five sources with intimate knowledge of Kirk's meeting with Ackman,” the gathering “turned into an 'intervention' where he was 'hammered' for his increasingly skeptical views on the US special relationship with Israel, and for platforming prominent conservative critics of Israel at his TPUSA events.” Blumenthal continues his account:

“The meeting went off the rails when Ackman personally confronted Kirk about his views on Israel. The public face of UK Lawyers for Israel, Natasha Hausdorff, joined in the argument, and began ‘screaming’ at Kirk, according to the attendee. When his hosts presented him with a detailed list of every offense he supposedly committed against Israel, Kirk was ‘horrified,’ said one person. Ackman also allegedly demanded Kirk rescind his invitation for Tucker Carlson to speak at his upcoming America Fest 2025 in December. ‘The whole thing was a disaster,’ said an attendee. Kirk, according to one person with inside knowledge of the meeting with Ackman, said he left feeling as though he’d been subjected to ‘blackmail.’”

The attendees list, also corroborated by their public social media accounts, read like a who’s who of attention-craving Zionist “influencers”, clearly astroturfed together by Ackman to pressure Kirk. They include Natasha Hausdorff, legal director of UK Lawyers for Israel, whom the Adelson-owned Israel Hayom praised as “the British attorney who fights Israel’s wars”; Xaviaer DuRousseau, Instagram “influencer” working for PragerU, the propaganda outlet led by an officer of Unit 8200’s cyber-spying division; his best buddy (and fellow PragerU lemming) Emily Wilson, who calls herself “Emily Saves America” despite engaging in constant activism for Israel. Two weeks after the intervention, DuRousseau and Wilson enjoyed an all-expenses-paid trip by the Israeli State to propagandize about Gaza. Their videos openly mocking the starved Palestinians have gone viral and speak much about the lengths to which psychopaths lacking true personality would do anything for money paid them by psychopaths with authority.

Interestingly, even as recent as February Wilson herself was lamenting “the SECOND I even make a comment on Israel’s government I’m called antisemitic and people literally lose their minds.” Yet she has been a reliable Zionist prostitute ever since, engaged in hasbara while working overtime to deflect attention into the same culture war distractions lest there be left/right coalitions awakening to her paymasters. When DuRousseau wasn’t selling his soul in Israel, he was too busy partying and “wine drunk” to be bothered about any investigation into Kirk’s assassination. Two weeks later, he was honored by the city commission of Hallandale Beach, Florida, which declared Sept. 29th “Xavaier Day” in a ceremony where they flashed their Duper’s delight before an Israeli flag covered over a US flag. These are the sort of activities engaged in by these “influencers” now that Kirk is “out of the way” so American conservatism can now openly assume its Israel-First transmogrification.

Other attendees included Seth Dillon, CEO of Babylon Bee, the conservative outlet which dropped its "satire" mask into full-blown Zionist propaganda.(8) Dillon is an evangelical Christian who speaks of his faith while boasting about his “Ashkenazi blood” giving him special spiritual privileges (contradicted by his own faith: Romans 10:12, Galatians 3:28, 1 Timothy 1:4, Titus 3:9); Arynne Wexler, former Goldman Sachs trader who openly argued “we need to bring bullying back” to enforce support for Israel and crack down on what she calls “anti-Semitism”; and Ory Rinat, former Special Media Advisor to Jared Kushner who now serves as CEO of Urban Legend, leading “an army of 700 social media influencers who command varying degrees of allegiance from audiences that collectively number in the tens of millions.” This army of Israeli-funded influencers was activated by a gleeful Netanyahu himself only weeks after the assassination, as part of the Esther Project – a similar name to the Heritage Foundation’s plan to subvert free speech against Israel, and evokes a story filled with notions of a crypto-identity and “ancestral” enemies similar to ‘Amalek’ (a common Zionist trope).



DuRousseau and the City Commission of Hallandale
Beach, Florida, covering the Israeli flag OVER the US
flag, in a ceremony declaring Sept. 29th "Xaviaer Day"
(Source)



Psychotherapist Daniella Bloom, who steers out of her
lane into "JEXIT" grifter and whining Zionist propagandist,
speaking at the Adelson-funded Jewish News Syndicate



Unhinged Bloom Demands TPUSA “Must Continue” to Serve Israel

Psychotherapist Daniella Bloom, who signs off all her writings with “National Ambassador of JEXIT (Jews Exiting the Democrat party)” and “Unapologetically Pro America and Pro Israel Advocate” (the former clearly subjugate to the latter in her formulation), wrote an op-ed for the Times of Israel on 5th August. Entitled “Turning Point must continue to be a safe haven for aligned Pro-America, Pro-Israel Jews on campus and for future generations”, Bloom wrote: “Dear Charlie Kirk, the Noise Got to You, Too.” The ‘noise’ is her Orwellian term for Kirk even associating with individuals critical of Israel, influencing him to ask too many questions. Her article is worth quoting in detail as an example of the typical Zionist talking points - and some ways I respond to their propaganda narratives. 

She described her first meeting with Kirk, how they “spoke about the crisis of Israel’s PR and the alarming rise of progressive influence on campus – funded not just by Qatari money, but also by powerful socialist Jews.” … Given that the Zionist cause in the US is backed up by billionaire oligarchs who openly express their allegiance to Israel, such as Larry Ellison, Robert Shillman, and Bill Ackman; with Ellison’s consolidation of CBS/Paramount and TikTok on the personal urging of Netanyahu (who called it one of Israel’s “weapons”); with a powerful AIPAC lobby which makes or breaks politicians; all-expenses-paid propaganda trips to Israel, and paying “influencers” to promote hasbara; QR codes for donors to scan favored puppets at AIPAC conferences, etc..

The likes of Bloom can only deflect to some fictitious “Qatari” bogeyman while billions of blood-soaked dollars are funneled and laundered to manufacture consent for Israel. Even more perverse is her mentioning “powerful socialist Jews” which she was ‘allowed’ to do as a Jewess, whereas the Gentile Kirk was accused of “anti-Semitism” for expressing something similar in late Oct. 2023(9), in a fake “controversy” designed to corral the parameters of debate safely within a Zionist dialectic as I described in Part 1. Yet her evoking “powerful socialist Jews” is also a convenient valve to solely blame the actions of Zionists upon this other group who happen to form a large section of leftist pro-Palestine movements, in contrast to the blameless Zionists. Bloom clearly wants to direct gullible Gentiles towards her own perceived inter-Judaic civil war as the self-styled founder of JEXIT.  

“After watching the recent focus group on Israel and AIPAC, I’m heartbroken – not just by what was said, but by what wasn’t,” Bloom continues, using her psychological training to play up this archetype of a manipulative woman who projects grievances to garner sympathy for her cause. … “Watching that focus group unfold was gut-wrenching. The segment didn’t resemble a balanced discussion—it resembled a set-up. A slow-burning dog whistle of insinuation, imbalance, and omission.” This is even while what really comes out throughout her article is less sadness and more anger, indeed validated when she next accuses Kirk and the students of “coded antisemitism,” again deflecting to other lobbies and “radical Islam – the actual global threat that unites anti-Israel actors.”

Such Zionist propagandists gloss over the Israeli intelligence services’ own links to radical Islamist groups, whether that be funding the rise of Hamas (as a counterbalance to the secular PLO), or aligning with the Islamist fanatics who overthrew Qadhafi in Libya and Assad in Syria. Nor has radical Islam been any impediment to close ties behind the scenes between Israel and the Wahhabi petro-sheikhdoms, as the “Abraham Accords” continues to expand against their common bogeyman of Iran. Those were wars championed by the likes of Netanyahu (who spoke of “positive reverberations” in a 2002 US congressional hearing) and the Israel-Firsters. The latter such as Bloom are only “pro-American” insofar as the State continues to fund Israel and fight wars for their interests. Nor will the likes of Bloom mention how Israeli media and fanatical rabbis with close ties to the Likud establishment have evoked a “war” between Christians and Muslims as fulfilling their “prophecies” out of which Israel is envisioned as ultimate victor. 



Whether Bloom or the other Zionist propagandists
mentioned in this article believe such "prophecies"
is unknown, but certainly the existence of such a
current exposes the fraud behind their dialectic of
a "Judeo-Christian" West vs. Islam, all for the
benefit of Greater Israel and the War/Debt Machine.



Bloom laments “how the seeds of Jew-scapegoating get watered – not by swastikas, but by ‘just asking questions’” about Israel. “You’ve built your platform on Judeo-Christian values. Don’t trade those in for applause from the Dave Smith, Joe Rogan, Tucker-adjacent crowd who mistake edgy cynicism for wisdom.” …. As with other woke liberals who made this pivot to conservatism after 7th Oct. 2023 (their Year Zero), Bloom wants to cancel all criticism of Israel behind such hyperbolic “Jew-scapegoating” hysteria. She welcomed Kirk's free debate about social issues, but she cried foul the moment he allowed criticism of Israel at his events. Only lock and step compliance is acceptable to her ilk who bestow upon themselves the "moral clarity" (their roots are in woke, after all) to police any wrongthink. Her psychological manipulation sought to cajole him with such emotional blackmail even while publicly evoking her self-serving “friendship” (just as Josh Hammer keeps plugging his book in all his interviews and statements about Kirk’s assassination etc.).

Why is this “Judeo-Christian” slogan repeated ad nauseum by Zionist propagandists? Jews and Christians who know the differences between their respective religions tend not to use it given foundational disagreements over the Trinity and Jesus, never mind subsidiary issues distinguishing their respective “covenants”. Rather, this term is a political tool to qualify the latter with the former adjective. As a Pagan, I have no urge to qualify another religion with the standards of my own spiritual worldview, especially given our core differences. Yet Zionists use “Judeo-Christian” for their own propaganda purposes to ensure Christians are joined at the hip with the modern political entity of Israel. This is why Bloom repeatedly deflects to “radical Islam” while ignoring how Christians are treated within her precious Israel, or how Iran and its allies (Bashar al-Assad, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Shi’ite groups in Iraq) are known as regional protectors of Christian minorities while Israel aligned with their Wahhabist persecutors. We can also cite Iran’s historic ties to Armenia in stark contrast to Israel’s supporting and arming Azerbaijan against that Christian nation.  

She raised the strawman that “Israel is not the reason” for Americans unable to buy homes, open borders, inflation, and other failed policies. She completely glosses over the obvious fact that when countless billions are annually poured into Israel, rather than being invested domestically, and not to mention invisible costs, lost opportunities, and the energy extracted to instead be poured into this foreign cause, that it clearly does have a direct effect on economics and domestic policies. She tries to assume the “logical” psychologist, but her emotion comes out when she next outbursts in this public article against Kirk: “Stop pretending that if AIPAC disappeared, America’s problems would vanish too. That’s not patriotism. That’s propaganda.” One couldn’t invent a better case of projection from a Zionist propagandist whose entire modus operandi is to gatekeep American patriotism into Israel-First servility.

“Stand now with Israel,” Bloom pleaded, oblivious to see by her own admission this wasn’t standing with America. “Now more than ever, we—as Jews and Christians who proudly love America and stand with Israel—must stand strong together in our alignment.” She continued to gatekeep and make demands: “Turning Point must continue to be a safe haven for aligned Pro-America, Pro-Israel Jews on campus and for future generations.” Why a professed Christian organization such as Turning Point “must” serve her own ethno-identity politics is lost in her explanation, but more significant is her open admission of dual loyalties to this one foreign state. 

She decried a “coordinated campaign” between “anti-Israel Democrats” and “MAGA Woke Right”, “to divide Christians from Jews, and sell fear and scapegoating as political strategy,” even while her entire screed fear-mongers about radical Islamic “threats” (to manufacture more wars for Israel), scapegoating “Woke Right” and other domestic critics of Israel, etc.. Her litanies of “benefits” of supporting Israel include “cutting-edge security intelligence” (nothing about espionage and selling those secrets to China), the “Iron Dome” (even more ironic given its failures against Iranian missiles, so much so that the pro-Israel Trump regime bailed them out by depleting the domestic arsenal), and “reinvesting” into US defense contractors, claiming this “creates jobs” and “bolsters our own military readiness” when its actually about profits for the Military-Industrial-Complex and inflating a “defense” budget of trillions while all other sectors of American society and economy are neglected.

“Israel’s innovation in cybersecurity, water conservation, agriculture, and medicine blesses the entire globe.” ‘Innovations’ made possible by the countless billions poured into Israel from American taxpayers, but two points here: Cybersecurity, as in a weapon of subversion and espionage by Unit 8200; and ‘Medicine,’ which would include the jabs, lockdown policies, and tracking apps enabled through the Rona. The American blood and treasure expended to prop up Israel and fight wars against its enemies mean little to the supremacist Bloom, who then cites “cherry tomatoes in your salads and delicious sliced seedless watermelons” as part of this alleged “Israeli revolutionized innovation.” “Supporting Israel is not an act of disloyalty to America—it’s the opposite,” implying that “disloyalty” to Israel would similarly be disloyalty to the US. She closed her screed with “We’re counting on you Charlie,” not clarifying who “we” are.







Kirk Questioned Israel Narratives in Two Public Shows

We see before us a timeline of Zionist pressure, public denunciations and manipulative “emotional” appeals, background interventions and financial threats from donors brought to bear upon Kirk, within three months before his assassination. The more he merely asked questions about Israel and refused to cut off anti-Zionist conservatives, the more the billionaires ensured that Rabbi Pesach Wolicki and Josh Hammer were increasingly placed within his orbit to be in his ears at all times, desperately seeking to mitigate any possible appeals he was hearing from Israel-critical voices. Perhaps given his personality, the more they pressured him the more he opened his mind and began piercing over two decades of Zionist programming. This came to a head with revelations of a private text thread just two days before his death, where Kirk explicitly said he was given “no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.” Two public appearances before his assassination confirm his shift.

Following the Hamptons “intervention”, a visibly angered Kirk appeared on conservative commentator Megyn Kelly’s show on 9th August. They prefaced the interview with the caveat “We’re both supporters of Israel,” and throughout it repeated many of the same hasbara talking points we have grown accustomed to after Oct. 2023. It certainly demonstrates they were not anti-Zionist and still preferred Israel over the Palestinians but made some shifts on Israel as it relates to domestic considerations – piercing through the dogma of complete US support for everything Israel does. And as I’ve already expressed, Zionists accept only complete compliance and tolerate not even the slightest criticism from public US voices and anyone with a platform. 

They talked about backlash from even talking about Epstein’s Mossad links, and agreed Israel was losing the “moral high-ground” (sic) and “propaganda war.” Kirk said: “The thing that I think is being lost is that on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. But if I have any deviation of a purity test, such as hosting a focus group with a bunch of our students that went viral; having Dave Smith or Tucker Carlson at our event. All of a sudden 'Charlie is no longer with us anymore,' wait a second what does 'with us' mean? I'm an American. I represent this country and I don't even understand that paradigm. And Megyn, I think you would agree with this, I want to make sure we really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. It would be one thing if it was one text, or two texts, it is dozens of texts. Then we start to say hold on, hold the boat here. And to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends say that's not all of us. But these are leaders too, these are stakeholders.”

Kelly contended how “some in the pro-Israel camp are so knee-jerk about calling you anti-Semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn’t align with their narrative, that it undermines their cause.” Still, she insanely claimed “its propaganda coming at us from Hamas” – such is the stranglehold Zionism has within US media and those who due to either their own programming or careerism, do not allow themselves to stray from this mental kibbutz. Kirk reiterated his support for Israel based on his interpretation of Christianity, including “scriptural land-rights” and simply as the place where Christianity arose. “However, Megyn, you're hitting on something very potent and important,” Kirk opened up. 

“I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're going to be pro-Hamas. 'Charlie, what are you doing?' What am I doing?! I'm sorry, like let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes, I want Israel to win. Yes, I'm a Christian, but like some of the messages, and you've seen how I've been treated Megan by some, not all, by some.” Kelly spoke about how “Dave Smith is allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides [in the July debate],” to which he replied: “No, you’re not allowed to. It’s even worse than that.” “Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first. Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. But it goes to the point where if, for example, if I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really really weird, isn't it, Megan?”







On 6th Sept, Zionist propagandist Ben Shapiro appeared on “Life, Liberty & Levin,” a Fox News program hosted by Mark Levin, who had earlier publicly criticized Charlie Kirk for opposing the war against Iran and allowing Israel-critical voices at TPUSA (perhaps also envious due to his own irrelevance). Their dialogue is worth quoting to establish what amounts to a threat only four days before Kirk was assassinated. They were placing such ideas within the ether, on the cultural level, essentially accusing Kirk - although not mentioning him by name, it was clear within the context - of “treason” to their cause. Amidst his own bankrupt and declining platform, Shapiro stood to benefit from establishing himself as the gatekeeper of American conservatism while excommunicating those who dare to question the Israel-First narrative....

Levin: “Do you think there's enough of an effort to push back? I find that conservative groups and conservative organizations that have these weekend events and these seminars, whether they're for young people or think tanks or that sort of thing. They sort of sprinkle these events with these America haters who claim to be American-Firsters and are fake MAGA and even stab the president in the back.”

Shapiro: “Yeah, I mean I think it's definitely an attempt by some of these organizations to quote unquote 'maintain the big tent.' But the reality is that as many have said, the problem with a ‘big tent’ is that you may end up with many many clowns inside, and the most fundamental thing is that just because you’re saying somebody votes Republican—that doesn’t mean that they ought to be the preacher at the front of the church, they’re not the person that ought to be leading the movement, if they are spending all day criticizing the President of the United States as ‘covering up a Mossad rape ring’ or ‘being a tool of the Israelis for hitting an Iranian nuclear facility.’”

The day before his assassination, Kirk interviewed Shapiro on his show: “We’ve pushed back against the media on Covid, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border. So maybe we should also ask the question: Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question that maybe we shouldn’t believe everything the media says, because I know I’ve been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse, some people in the Israeli government are saying….” The clip shows Shapiro with raised eyebrows, shocked that Kirk would even question the narrative about Israel. Kirk was obviously aware of Shapiro's public threats three days prior.

In a video posted to his social media less than 24 hours after Kirk’s assassination, Shapiro announced: “We’re going to pick up that blood stained microphone where Charlie left it.” Then in what appeared to be a humiliation ritual, Shapiro appeared on The Charlie Kirk Show, lecturing a silent Kolvet, Matt Walsh, and Michael Knowles on “unity” around “Biblical conservative values”, before handing over a $1 million donation to TPUSA – from whom did the money come from? What was behind this public spectacle? I contend these were obvious moves by Zionist billionaire donors to ensure Turning Point would no longer turn away from the Israel-First kibbutz. And each of these voices since then have not questioned the “official” narrative and seem to want to move on quickly from any investigations; and so too have they doubled down on culture war distractions or publicly criticized those asking the questions.

[To be continued in Part 3 with Kirk’s texts announcing his final break from “the pro-Israel cause,” Josh Hammer’s cryptic calls for “public execution,” TPUSA leaders doubling down on Christian Zionism, Geofencing and the Israeli/Technocratic element, and other cultural and suspicious events since the assassination….] 








NOTES:

(1) The number 24 is symbolic within Kabbalah for “judgement and severity,” and the number of sacrificed offerings before the Temple altar. (See Rabbi Dr. Hillel ben David, “The Significance of The Number Twenty-four. Netanyahu sees himself as fulfilling such a “divine mission” as he was told in a 1990 meeting with Chabad leader Schneerson. Or as he told i24 TV interviewer Sharon Gal, who presented him an amulet of a Greater Israel map, in August: “So if you’re asking if I have a sense of mission, historically and spiritually, the answer is yes.” At his UN appearances, Netanyahu gaslights maps of “Blessing” and “Cursed” nations. The Temple tie-in is there too with the Temple Institute and their ilk around Ben-Gvir and Smotrich among his coalition partners. Given all of this, the Iranians weren’t so far-fetched when they spoke about dark occult forces also at play in Israel’s war.

(2) “Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ‘It’s very good.’ Then he edited himself: ‘Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.’ He predicted that the attack would ‘strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.’” (James Bennet, "A DAY OF TERROR: THE ISRAELIS; Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer," New York Times, Sept. 12, 2001, Section A, p. 22).

He reiterated this during a conference at Bar-Ilan University: “We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.” These events “swung American public opinion in our favor.” (Maariv, 16 April 2008. Cited in Haaretz the same day.) On the first anniversary of those attacks, Netanyahu was in Congress lobbying for the U.S. to invade Iraq, peddling the WMD lie and the “positive reverberations” in the region. Of course, the war’s Neocon architects were openly following the Clean Break plan they wrote up for him in 1996. This itself was an update of the Oded Yinon Plan for a “Greater Israel” laid out from the 1980s onward. 

(3) It was Bari Weiss who, along with her fellow Zionist Eric Weinstein, coined the phrase “intellectual dark web” which set the stage for the rise of Woke Zionism and Tech Bros through which Larry Ellison, Bill Ackman, Shaun Maguire, Joe Lonsdale, Alex Karp, and other Techno-Zionist oligarchs give a pseudo-“intellectual” justification for their levels of control. The term specifically describes a cabal of mediocre thinkers or sociopathic miscreants like Curtis Yarvin, Dave Rubin, and James Lindsay, whose platforms are astroturfed by oligarch funding to manufacture cultural consent. They were propelled out of obscurity as part of the corporate/technocratic pivot into this new iteration of Woke masquerading as its “antithesis”. Aside from supporting Israel, Eric Weinstein’s Judeo-supremacism was also on display when he raised a middle finger “salute” at the Arch of Titus in 2021, holding on to an insane 2000-year-old grudge against Rome for destroying the Temple of Jerusalem. This is even while Weinstein has spoken against the “grievance” politics of Woke whenever exhibited by any other people.

(4) Wolicki is a member of the 'Israel365' organization which printed its own Israel Bible preaching Noahide deification of Jews by Gentiles. In July 2025, Israel365 operated propaganda trips funded by the Israeli Foreign Ministry for American conservative ‘influencers’ in a busy month that also saw a huge consolidation of US media by Zionist billionaires David and Larry Ellison. 

(5) The key here is organized Judeo-supremacism, a collective hive mentality inculcated through programming about being a “chosen” nation over the other. It goes without saying there are many exemplary anti-Zionist Jewish voices who have sacrificed much in their stance, whether they be from the secular or many Hasidic groups. Yet its also simplistic to claim it has “nothing” to do with Judaism at all when we see religious elements throughout Zionism, such as the evoking of “Amalek” and the entire claim to Palestine and beyond. Their perception of their own Jewishness informs how they relate to Israel as an exalted nation of their foremost loyalty, perhaps for some even a replacement from keeping the 613 mitzvot and other tenets of that religion.

(6) Yoseph Janowski, a Zionist whose writings have also appeared on Exodus Magazine and Chabad.org, wrote an article “Trump, Israel, and the Epstein Files” published by the Times of Israel on 21st July 2025. He openly admitted how Epstein was an Israeli blackmail operation and threatened Trump with it over even the slightest criticism of Netanyahu (never mind that he was still funding and running cover for Israel at every turn). “Trump and his administration criticized Netanyahu and Israel. And now the Epstein files are haunting him. For a long time the files had subsided in the background. They weren’t considered to be much of a threat to Trump. But all of a sudden, right after he started up with Israel, the files surfaced, and they seem to be overwhelming him.”

Their being “subsided in the background” meaning as a blackmail threat looming over any who showed even the slightest difference to Israel. Janowski cited Trump’s “berating” Netanyahu about Israel bombed the church in Gaza, a “madman” after bombing Syria, and his hesitancy in committing the US to complete war against Iran aside from a one-off strike: “And now, some old files are threatening him. Perhaps Trump will realize, that it really doesn’t pay to start up with Israel. Perhaps those implicated in the files, will express contrition and regret.” The Epstein blackmail would continue until “Everyone sees, that the world is not a jungle, and that G-d Almighty runs the world with compassion, giving humanity the ability to fix what’s wrong, so that we can have peace with true ethics — as G-d told Moses at Mount Sinai, to tell all nations to adhere to the seven Noahide laws.”

(7) David Horowitz’s son, Ben Horowitz, co-founded the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz with Marc Andreessen. The two personally visited Israel to recruit from “elite IDF tech talent,” likely alluding to Unit 8200. So we see yet another correlation between the fake ‘conservatism’ of David Horowitz which justified corporatism and predatory finance, with Zionism, and together converging with Technocracy.

(8) After Israeli tanks fired upon the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza, Babylon Bee managing editor Joel Berry wrote on 19 July: “This won’t be easy for people to hear, but there are only about 200 professed Catholics still living in Gaza and they all support Hamas.” He followed up: “Anyone who supports Hamas and the extermination of the Jewish people is not a Christian, no matter what they profess, or where they go to church.” He doubled-down the next day: “I apologize for nothing. Go pound sand.” This is just one expression of the cultural divide between Catholics and evangelical Christian Zionists, also revealing why the latter could care less even about Palestinian Christians, who are mostly Orthodox or Catholic “heretics” according to evangelicals – lower in their view than the Israelis they worship.

(9) “And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do. A lot of decoupling to do. Because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border, neo-liberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and non-profits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now its coming for Jews, and they’re like what on earth happened. And its not just the colleges, it’s the nonprofits, it’s the movies, its Hollywood, all of it. Time for you guys to wake up and say no more, draw a line in the sand. I don’t care if you hate me.” – Charlie Kirk on his Show, 26 Oct. 2023