Tuesday, October 10, 2017

Cataluña and the Soros Agenda: "Open Society" documents revealed funding separatist think-tanks

Cataluña and the Soros Agenda: "Open Society" documents revealed funding separatist think-tanks

by Sean Jobst
10 October 2017

Oye Soros Gilipollas: Al infierno con su "Sociedad Abierta"!

It doesn't take a forensicist to find "philanthropist" banker George Soros' fingerprints all over the world. Catalonia is certainly no exception, as was revealed in financial data uncovered by Barcelona daily La Vanguardia in 2016. On 16 August 2016, an article by Quico Sallés revealed the extent to which Soros financed the propaganda wing of the Catalan independence movement. This is the same wing that is now lobbying on behalf of Catalonia's independence effort, among global media.

According to internal documents provided by the Soros Foundation, between 12/16/2013 and 1/31/2014, Soros' Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) "awarded" USD $27,049 to the Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia (Diplocat). The records indicate media coverage of elections was at the heart of this amount, quite massive for only one month and which we can deduce included more funding in the months and perhaps even years to come.

Founded by private donors, Diplocat defines itself as engaging in "paradiplomacy", a term coined in 1990 to describe an active and independent role of regional governments to make its own foreign policy within a federal system. This describes Diplocat perfectly, being the foreign policy of the Generalitat de Catalunya that is now leading Catalan separatism. Diplocat is thus the world face of the pro-independence side.

The Soros Foundation documents also revealed US $24,973 "awarded" during the same period to the pro-independence think-tank, Centre d’Informació i Documentació Internacionals a Barcelona (CIDOB), which handles "Information and Documentation" for the Generalitat. Both Diplocat and CIDOB have been leading successful efforts now to lobby international media support for the Catalan independence cause, particularly in the narratives now being promoted in outlets the world over.

Well-funded Diplocat propaganda, presented to media outlets

The immediate cause for the funding were two conferences held in Barcelona in January 2014. CIDOB used the money to finance a conference on "integration," while that held by Diplocat was officially called "European Elections 2014: the increase of xenophobia and the Eurosceptic movements in Europe". The latter conference was coordinated by Elisabet Moragas and presided over by the Diplocat president Albert Royo, and was held behind closed doors and by invitation only - bringing together politicians and media representatives for "open dialogue".

Apparently, much like Soros' parlance of an "Open Society", such an "open dialogue" could still be held behind closed doors and excluding a public whose opinions they ultimately care nothing about. Given the Orwellian title of the conference, the assembled technocrats undoubtedly made decisions regarding the migrant crisis and how media outlets would cover that issue. Under the supervision of the politicians funded by Soros NGOs and foundations, the participating journalists could manipulate public opinion in whatever way already predetermined for them by the financiers of the conference.

Soros: "Our plan treats national borders as the obstacle"

The utter disregard for sovereignty or even the much-vaunted "democratic" process, is on full display by looking at Soros' recorded statements to the media. Referring with contempt to the natural, normal instinct for a country to maintain its demographic integrity by preventing unfettered immigration, the elitist Soros admits he has no respect for sovereignty: "Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle."

The world itself is testament to their devious principle. Soros funded NGOs and think-tanks that pushed for so-called "humanitarian" intervention in countries such as Libya and Syria, of course such "humanitarianism" being an Orwellian cover for the exact opposite: supporting armed groups and lobbying for foreign bombings in the name of "human rights", undermining governments that had run afoul of his elite and engineering civil wars to destabilize those countries. His associate, former Irish Attorney General and chairman of Goldman Sachs International, Peter Sutherland, is even more public about this in his capacity as the UN's Special Representative for International Migration.

At the same time, Soros has been at the heart of the mass-migration crisis in Europe, flooding the same European countries he despises with a huge number of economic migrants. These migrants were brought into Europe through the various NGOs he funds. The media sells it to the public as refugees, obviously through the decisions made behind closed doors at such elite conferences as that of Diplocat - obscuring the fact that the majority are actually economic migrants. Even those actual refugees are the result of policies engineered by the likes of Soros, who profits from war.

Enter Fundación La Caixa

Towards this end, Soros funds the European Program for Integration and Migration (EPIM), which is a coalition of twelve elite-connected nonprofits. One of these is La Caixa Foundation, another bank that perpetuates debt slavery while pretending to engage in "social projects". Much like Soros' Avaaz in Libya and the White Helmets in Syria, Fundación La Caixa has engaged in highly-sophisticated and well-funded propaganda campaigns under the guise of "human rights". Within Spain and Europe generally, it has especially been active promoting mass-migration.

Interestingly, La Caixa Foundation was until very recently based in Catalonia. Literally less than a week ago, it announced that it moved its registered office to Valencia; the day after, it announced another move to Mallorca. I doubt the move is coincidental, given the links Soros networks have with both La Caixa and the Catalan government's pro-independence think-tanks and foreign ministry. Perhaps it knows the effects of destabilizing Spain, so it could better pursue its intrigues outside of Catalonia but still near enough to have a direct role. This is speculation, but what's certain is that La Caixa has links with the same Generalitat de Catalunya lobbying for independence, being a recipient of its Gold Medal in 2005. The nexus of politicians and bankers manifests yet again.

Catalan Diplocat migrant welcome committee
- but no "bienvenidos" for brother Spaniards?

Royo: "Very painful that Catalonia can’t welcome more refugees in spite of its willingness only because Spain won’t allow it"

The twin planks of Soros' "open society" are an erosion of national sovereignties and any borders, and unfettered immigration into Europe. Both of these are directly linked to the various activities of his NGOs around the world, each working closely in concert with each other so that the actions of one set up the "problem" which other constituents of his network can then come in and "solve". I've previously described this process in relation with Germany. It should be no surprise the Soros-funded Diplocat is actively promoting mass-immigration, and indeed has even described one of the factors for independence from Spain so that Catalonia could welcome even more "refugees" (nearly all are economic migrants in reality), as this article on their official website admits:

09 Feb 2017
DIPLOCAT joins campaign in favour of refugees and asylum seekers

Albert Royo recalls Catalonia’s willingness to welcome more refugees

The Public Diplomacy Council of Catalonia (Diplocat) joined today the campaign “Our home, your home”, driven by a group of independent citizens and Catalan organizations concerned about the present situation of thousands of migrants and displaced people inside and outside the European Union. Diplocat will help to give international visibility to the historic commitment of Catalonia towards asylum and exile as a result of its own recent history.

The campaign declaration, which already has more than 53,600 signatures, has now Diplocat’s support as an entity. The Council also encourages citizens to attend the concert on Saturday and to participate in the demonstration to be held in Barcelona on 18th February under the slogan "No more excuses, welcome now," which is expected to be the most massive rally in Europe for this cause.
Diplocat’s Secretary General, Albert Royo, says that "we are talking about the most important humanitarian crisis since World War II” and that it is "very painful that Catalonia can’t welcome more refugees in spite of its willingness only because Spain won’t allow it". {END}

¿Dónde están los "catalanes"?

I've previously documented foreign interests supporting this movement for Catalan independence. And I just showed the admission by independence supporter Albert Royo, who heads the well-funded Diplocat that has lobbied for the separatist cause among foreign media outlets, that accepting even more migrants into Catalonia is a primary motivation for independence - admitting it prefers foreign economic migrants to accepting their own place as brothers among Iberian peoples actually related to Catalans by blood, ancestry and history. It should be no surprise then that ungrateful migrants would come to Spain and turn around and lobby with various Marxists, foreign powers and Globalist bankers for this current Catalan independence effort. There have been many such "Catalans" at separatist protests in Barcelona....


Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Who's Really Behind the Catalan Separatist Movement?

Who's Really Behind the Catalan Separatist Movement?
by Sean Jobst
3 October 2017
The Catalan independence movement, in the news recently with the referendum for independence, has very vocal political and ideological backers in Israel and Russia. These two countries, as well as its amen corner in various pro-Israeli and pro-Russian media outlets, have interfered in the internal affairs of Spain and given the Catalan separatists their blessing. This is even while both countries have a long and continued history of squashing violently the independence aspirations of the peoples they occupy, denying its occupied people any such referendum.

The Catalan independence advocate, Barcelona High Court Judge Santiago Vidal, told the Barcelona Delta magazine in its Nov.-Dec. 2014 edition that it would be unlikely that Catalan separatists could appeal to the Central Bank of Europe: "But there is a solution for this: another state with solvency. Basically speaking of Israel and Germany, will serve as our temporary bank." The obvious double standard on courting the support of the occupier of the Palestinians was not lost on Vidal, who had a quick answer: "The Palestinian issue is characterized by violence. Whereas, the Catalan issue is characterized by civic lessons, pacifism and the doing of good things that we are giving to the whole world. And this is something the Israelis like very much." (Julie Steigerwald, "Catalan Independence Advocate Looks to Israel, Germany for Funding," Jerusalem Post, Nov. 24, 2014)
A "Petition to the State of Israel to support the independence of Catalonia" was delivered to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Ambassador Alon Bar. It garnered 1,146 supporters, mostly Catalan separatists and leftist Spaniards. A perusal of the comments section of the petition reveals a deep-seated hatred of Spain, which it collectively accuses of "anti-Semitism" in contrast to a Catalonia presented as a more "progressive" state that would naturally look to Israel as its inspiration. The thread throughout is one of simply: Catalans and self-hating Spaniards against Spain, but singing the praises of Israel as chief benefactor of an independent Catalonia.

Israeli Ambassador to Spain: "It is wonderful Israel can be a source of inspiration for Catalonia"

Alon Bar, the Israeli Ambassador to Spain and Andorra, gave an interview to Nació Digital on 20 May 2012 which has been approvingly touted on a website proclaiming its objective as "Catalan Independence explained to the World". How strange is it for an ambassador allegedly representing one country's interests in another country, to so actively sympathize with and even promote a separatist movement against the very country which graciously hosts him! Yet, this is exactly how Alon Bar has championed the Catalan cause as most beneficial to Israel. When asked about the much larger number of Israelis who visit Barcelona (300,000) compared to Madrid (40,000), as well as certain similarities with the Catalans, the ambassador replied: 

"There is a special friendship, and also some admiration, in the parallel renewal system of Hebrew and Catalan. We recall contacts with Jordi Pujol before the establishment of diplomatic relations between Spain and Israel. There is a special relationship that has been strengthened given the circumstances....Relationships are good and fluid with President Artur Mas' team, the Foreign Committee of the Parliament of Catalonia and the City Council. We have a special interest in establishing business contacts. Both administrations have signed mutual agreements to promote joint projects to increase commercial relationships and have strengthened the Catalan-Israeli Chamber of Commerce, which is very active. We see business opportunities in what Israel has to offer in times of crisis....I think it is wonderful Israel can be a source of inspiration for Catalonia." ("Interview with Israel Ambassador to Andorra and Spain, Alon Bar," Nació Digital, 20 May 2012)

Catalan Separatist Leader: "I am pro-Israel and pro-Zionist"

One of the leaders of the Catalan independence movement was Alfons Lopez Tena, leader of the Catalan Solidarity for Independence, who by 2015 dismissed any talk of Catalan independence as "wishful thinking" while still proclaiming: "I am not Spanish and I have never felt Spanish."  Nevertheless, he was very much a separatist when he gave an interview with the Israeli Haaretz newspaper in 2012, predicting an independent Catalonia within two years and "close friendship with Israel". This doyen of Catalan separatism expressed his own support for the foreign ideology of Zionism:

"On a personal level, I define myself as being pro-Israel and pro-Zionist. These are views I inherited, in my family. I well remember the concern that filled our house at the time of the Six Day War. I was a boy at the time, 10 years old, and we all prayed for Israel's survival. At least half of the members of my party are members of the Catalan Friends of Israel Association. Israel is a democratic state, and we support the steps it takes for survival, and the survival of the Jewish people. We have no intention of criticizing what its government does. We seek cooperation with Israel, and we hope it will support our independence movement. It is clear that an independent Catalonia will be a close friend of Israel - there's no doubt about that." (Adar Primor, "Catalan Leader Predicts Independence in About Two Years, and Close Friendship With Israel," Haaretz, Oct. 4, 2012)

This same Israeli journalist earlier profiled Lopez Tena, in a very sympathetic article - so clearly there's a pattern of sympathy for Catalan separatism within the Israeli media: "Spain will not easily give up its crown jewel, but Lopez Tena is losing no time in making a promise that Europe's new member state will be very friendly to Israel. In that too it will separate itself from its rival in Madrid. And here is another message. Just as Catalonia will soon be the state of the Catalan people, Israel is first and foremost the state of the Jewish people. There is no future for a binational state. The latest victory of the separatists in Quebec, Canada, the continuing efforts to dismantle the Belgian kingdom, and the national referendum to take place in Scotland in 2014 are only a few examples that prove this. Neither a federation nor a confederation, nor autonomy, nor cantons. Binationalism is dead. Visca (Viva in Catalan ) Israel, Visca Catalonia." (Adar Primor, "Viva Catalonia, Viva Israel," Haaretz, Sept. 28, 2012)

The Generalitat de Catalunya and Israel

Catalan regionalist politician Jordi Pujol was longtime President of the Generalitat de Catalunya from 1980 until 23 December 2003. Even after his departure from power, he was still viewed as sufficiently influential that he was invited to address the Israeli Knesset on 28 October 2003. The speech was filled with invectives against Spanish history, cheered on by many who still obsess about medieval "oppression" in Spain against the Sephardic Jews and more recent "anti-Semitism" of the Franco period. But the most interesting part of his speech was his remarks about himself:

"I come from a family at first rather sympathetic with the Jews, but not especially interested. However, there was something that increased, by reaction, the pro-Jewish attitude, and that was the Franco regime was anti-Jewish. And oddly enough, he mixed [compared] Judaism with Catalanism. In times of great Francoist exaltation and xenophobia of Spain, we were accused of being the Jews of Spain. But as I said, I did not come into contact with Judaism alone. Also, and in a certain sense above all with Zionism. And not in a superficial way. At only 17-18 years old I read Herzl's 'Der Judenstaat' and a very comprehensive book by Chaim Weizmann, which tells the whole Zionist struggle."

Artur Mas con Shimon Peres

Pujol has attended and spoken at many functions of the Fundación Samuel Toledano, whose namesake Samuel Toledano, was the long-time leader of the Jewish community in Spain and was instrumental in Spain's establishment of diplomatic relations with Israel in 1987. Pujol's Catalunya cultivated many close trade and political links with Israel, and these were continued by another member of his CiU party, Artur Mas, President of the Generalitat from 2010 to 2015: "Israel is a strategic country for Catalonia and we want to continue strengthening our cooperation." 

Mas' successor and the current President of the Generalitat de Catalunya is Carles Puigdemont, also from Pujol's CiU. Former Mayor of Girona, Piugdemont came to power after an agreement between CiU and the two Catalan separatist parties, Junts pel Sí and CUP. He is the first Catalan President to refuse taking the oath of loyalty to the Spanish Constitution - even while enjoying the privileges of his autonomous position in the first place because of the Spanish state's blessings. Piugdemont may be moving Catalonia away from Spain - people who share the same blood, ancestry and history with the Catalans - but during his tenure has been moving even closer towards Israel. 

Under Piugdemont, the Catalan government has opened a trade and investment office in Tel Aviv. His media advisor, Aleix Clarió, confirmed on his Twitter that 32% of Spanish exports are to Israel (the bulk of them to Catalonia) and that 79% of Israeli investments in all of Spain are within Catalonia. Piugdemont has cultivated close links with Chabad, including its local representative, Barcelona Rabbi Dovid Liebersohn; Putin's Rabbi Berel Lazar, the Chabad Chief Rabbi of Russia; and Israeli-Russian billionaire Shimon Aminov.

Piugdemont with his Chabad friends, from left: Rabbi Moshe
Kotlarsky, Shimon Aminov, Putin's Rabbi Berel Lazar, and
Barcelona Rabbi Dovid Liebersohn

The Chabad Connection

Most notable in the above picture is four Chabad figures meeting with Piugdemont, who obviously enjoys cordial relations with this global Jewish supremacist organization that has deep finances. Foreshadowing the broader separatist trend, in 2016 the Jewish communities of five Catalan cities - Barcelona, Besalú, Castelló d’Empúries, Girona and Tortosa - withdrew from the national Network of Spanish Jewish Quarters to form their own regional network according to the Network's director Marta Puig Quixal: "This breakup is another example of how Catalan institutions are looking to go their own way." Girona Mayor Marta Madrenas evoked stronger Catalan-Jewish links as part of her own case for separatism: "We think we can do better in terms of showcasing our Jewish patrimony."

One Chabad website described an international Chabad conference that took place in the Catalan city of Girona, from 11-13 June 2017. It brought together 45 attendees from around the world, including many from countries with negligible Jewish populations. Girona was chosen because "It was once home to the second-largest Jewish community in Catalonia. In 1194, it was the birthplace of the medieval Kabbalist, Talmudist and Torah commentator Rabbi Moshe ben Nachman - known as Nachmanides or the Ramban - who served as its rabbi and established a yeshivah there."

Notable attendees included Rabbi Moshe Kotlarsky, vice chairman of the Chabad educational wing Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch; and Rabbi Berel Lazar, the Chief Rabbi of Russia and a close ally of Vladimir Putin. Aside from Lazar, there was another Russian link: "Organizers said the conference was being underwritten by Jewish-Russian transportation magnate Shimon Aminov, who in his travels has encountered many of the most remote Chabad emissaries and wanted to do something to support their work in return." The conference was also attended by its Guest of Honor Piugdemont, "who expressed his appreciation and admiration of the shluchim who flew in from near and far."

The Russian Connection

Even while expressing their opposition to the Kurdish independence referendum because its seen as held under American auspices, pro-Russian media has gone out of its way to champion the Catalan independence cause against Spain. This includes the blatantly pro-Catalan separatist, anti-Spanish coverage on Russia Today; expressed support for Catalan independence by Duginist websites and think-tanks; statements by selective "whistleblowers" Julian Assange and Edward Snowden, who are silent whenever Russia's interests tell them to be; and support for Catalan independence by many American "libertarians", including a factually incorrect article by Justin Raimondo which called Catalonia "A Spanish Tiananmen Square", while he consistently sings the praises of statist Putin and parrot Kremlin state media.

Julian Assange has seized upon the secessionist cause, in a massive display of activity on his social media accounts: "Assange, for all intents and purposes, has become the independence movement's chief international spokesman. The vast majority of his tweets this month, in many cases written in Spanish and Catalan, have centered around promoting Catalan secessionism and 'self-determination' as a bulwark against Madrid's 'repression.' Russian news agency Sputnik has helped, too — and has taken notice of Assange's tweets. The outlet posted 220 stories about the Catalan independence movement between September 11 and 27." (Natasha Bertrand, "Julian Assange is rallying behind Catalan separatists ahead of a historic referendum — and Russia has taken notice," Business Insider, Sept. 30, 2017)

One strange phenomenon within the last few years has been the staunch pro-Russian line taken by many U.S. libertarian media outlets. They have allowed their opposition to American interventionism not only to blind them to Putin's own interventionism, but to actively apologize for any Russian state action. A recent example was an article on Antiwar.com by academic Thomas Harrington. Obviously triggered by an El País article, he dismissed it as "Atlanticist" - using a common Duginist phrase. This alleged professor of Hispanic Studies nevertheless attacked Spain collectively as "ever-prisoner to its own endlessly repeated mythologies about self and other", and championed Catalans against the Spanish "centralists", while apologizing for Putin's Russia with its own authoritarian centralism.

The Moscow-based Anti-Globalization Movement, which only supports separatist movements that would weaken and destabilize the United States and European Union while justifying Putin's suppression of separatist movements at odds with Russian imperialism, issued a statement comparing Catalonia to Crimea. According to Russia researcher Casey Michel: "Catalonian independence advocates are among those who've flown to Moscow to meet with a group that, as of 2016, received Kremlin funding to help network Western separatist groups."


Towards what end are these forces supporting Catalan independence? Foremost is to destabilize Spain. To destabilize European countries identified with "Atlanticism" is indeed a primary objective of Dugin's Russo-centric Eurasianism. With an independent Catalan fiefdom separated from Spain and even more tightly controlled by Piugdemont and his malaise, the Israeli and other political links can enjoy more influence. Trade benefits can be even more for Israel if Catalonia is less connected to trade connections to the rest of Spain. A Catalan tax haven could be a boon for the Chabad, Israeli and Russian oligarchs already closely linked to local corruption.

A less obvious reason is a deep-seated vengeance against Spain. It may seem far-fetched at first, but many pro-Israel scholars have evoked a simplistic, one-sided, distorted historical view of medieval "anti-Semitism" against the Sephardic Jews and the Marranos, for modern political capital. Many books are published resurrecting this topic again and again, used to guilt-trip Spaniards. Specifically, it has been used to justify close Spanish relations with Israel and to shut down any dissent to Israeli policies; to grant the automatic right to citizenship to millions of Sephardic Jews of North Africa and elsewhere; to open up Spain to unfettered immigration and slander any opposition to this as "racist"; and to perpetuate thought-crime laws.

It should be clear to anyone who studies the political and financial links of Puigdemont, Artur Mas, Santiago Vidal, and other Catalan elites pushing for independence, that this is not a spontaneous, grassroots rising of a majority of people in Catalonia. Nor is it any move towards federalism and devolution, as its proponents - as well as the leftist and even communistic trends supporting it - envision a centralized Catalonia that might even grow to include regions such as Valencia and the Baleares. It would also be a state founded on a myth of a historically independent Catalonia, whereas historically it was linked with the Kingdoms of Aragon and Valencia.

Modern Catalonia is not some "exploited" region, but a privileged region that has often been propped up by the rest of Spain....one that already enjoys much autonomy: The right to its own language and parliament; led by its own President and Generalitat; exercising much local control over its trade and banking activities. Certainly it enjoys far more autonomy than the peoples occupied by the Israeli and Russian States that now meddle in España's affairs. I know its a painful pill for many to swallow, but....Cataluña es España!


Tuesday, September 26, 2017

Not A Conspiracy Theory: Eradicating the Germans through Mass-Immigration

Not A Conspiracy Theory: Eradicating the Germans through Mass-Immigration

by Sean Jobst
26 September 2017

In my previous article, I mentioned an Israeli named Avrum Ehrlich who called for a Semitic "reconciliation" between Jews and Arabs, so that the latter can accept a permanent Jewish State in their midst and redirect all their energies towards an Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe. A special ire was expressed towards Germany, which shouldn't be a surprise to those of us with German blood who are cognizant of the true history of our people. Recently, I've learned about a precursor to the Kalergi Plan from a video by Varg Vikernes:

A precursor of the Kalergi Plan (advocating the same methods of forced mass miscegenation) was formulated by Earnest Hooton (1887-1954), an American physical anthropologist and Harvard professor. In his article "Breed War Stain Out of Germans" for the New York daily newspaper P.M. Daily on 4th January 1943, Hooton proposed the eradication of the German people through an "outbreeding" plan that would "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities." (Cited in Benjamin Colby, Twas a Famous Victory: Deception and Propaganda in War with Germany, New York: Arlington House Publishers, 1975, p. 131)


The overall plan envisioned a period of 20 years to be implemented: "The objects of this measure include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals." The German family unit would be separated, with ten to twelve million German men assigned to forced labor under strict supervision in Allied countries, where they would be encouraged to mate with non-German women and forbidden from returning to Germany.

Meanwhile, German women would be at the mercy of the occupiers, who would encourage the mass-immigration of non-German - and especially non-European - men into Germany, and enforce their mating with German women: "During the occupation we must encourage also the immigration and settlement of foreigners into the German states, especially foreign men of the third world." Hooton's blatant racism against Germans, and the ridiculousness of his ahistorical myth about a unique German propensity towards "militarism", was such that even a Canadian socialist publication opposed it:

This is no conspiracy theory, but was an actual plan formulated by one who despised Germans so that he advocated ways to wipe them out of existence as a people. Despite claims to the contrary, I could not find any evidence that Hooton was actually Jewish. All indications are that he was a non-Jew who extolled the "superior" qualities of the Jews (much like Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, who referred to the Jews as a "spiritual nobility of Europe").

This is borne out by an article published in Collier's Magazine on April 28, 1939, whereby Hooton ascribed "anti-Semitism" to Gentile jealousy of the Jews for their "high average intelligence," in terms that prove he wasn't Jewish. While advocating Jewish intermarriage (unlike Kalergi), this was mostly a one-way benefit in his eyes: The Jews were already too "superior" to benefit from Gentile blood, while Jewish blood "would confer a great genetic boon upon mankind." (Cited in "Earnest A. Hooton Offers Cure for 'Jewish Problem,'" The Harvard Crimson, April 28, 1939)

"Dr. Ernest A. Hooton, who advocates sending Czechs, Austrians and other peoples into Germany to dilute the German stock [he actually advocated non-European immigrants in his original article], says the Germans 'are all affected with the same moral imbecility in accordance with which nobody deserves any consideration and nobody gets any.' The distinction often made between 'good Germans' and 'bad Germans' is erroneous, Dr. Hooton said. 'The only good Germans are the quick and the dead. The quick got out of Germany!'" ("Hooton Calls Germans 'Moral Imbeciles'," Canadian Jewish Chronicle, October 20, 1944, p. 15)

His plan was not alone, nor were his methods. Pandering to powerful Jewish voters and financial donors, 1940 U.S. Republican presidential candidate Wendell Wilkie advocated as one of America's war aims: "Abolition of racial exclusiveness of the German people!" (Wendell Wilkie, One World, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1943, p. 85). On October 22, 1939, Lionel de Rothschild urged his close friend and Churchill's secretary, John Colville, to define England's war aim: "Divide the Germans among the other nations of the world and leave Germany to the Jews." (John Colville, Downing Street Diaries, 1939-45, Berlin: Siedler Verlag, 1988, p. 31)

All of these proposals were touted in the American mainstream media, among official circles, not fringe figures. For example, Theodore Kaufman's 1941 book Germany Must Perish! was reviewed favorably by America's leading newspapers. The Kaufman Plan proposed the mass-sterilization of Germans and the division of Germany among neighboring countries. The latter proposal was partially implemented in the east, but the sterilization was viewed as expensive and too unrealistic. However, the Morgenthau Plan of the Jewish U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., which called for the eradication of the German people through mass-starvation and the theft of their industries, was partially implemented and only shelved with the Cold War.

However, in the decades since 1945 and especially the last few years, Germany has been flooded with a massive number of immigrants, mostly Muslim and economic migrants from non-warzones (despite the official propaganda presenting them as "refugees" fleeing war). Couple this with the unfortunate reduction of the German birth rate to below the replacement level, and we see the spirit proposed by past hatemongers alive and well - and forcibly imposed upon the German people with a vengeance. Leading politicians openly call for the eradication of their own constituents, merely for being from the German people.

Gregor Gysi is a German politician of Jewish ancestry, representing the openly Marxist party Die Linke. This Bundestag member grew up the son of a senior Communist Party apparatchik in East Germany, Klaus Gysi, closely-connected with the highest levels of the DDR hierarchy. Gregor Gysi was uncovered after reunification as a long-standing Stasi informant. He has advocated for Israel, purging from his party any members of the Boycott, Divestments, Sanctions (BDS) and Gaza Flotilla movements. He also successfully prevented the speaking engagements in Germany of two American Jewish anti-Israel activists, Norman Finkelstein and Max Blumenthal.

Yet, while advocating for the foreign state of Israel, this elected German politician led a protest in favor of mass-immigration held 6th June 2015, called "Live better without Nazis - Diversity is our future", wherein he conflated "Nazis" with German people generally (presumably even his gullible Die Linke constituents), saying with an obvious smirk: "Every year more native Germans die than there are born. That is very fortunate. It's because the Nazis are not very good at having offspring. This is why we are so dependent on immigration from foreign countries."

This is the classic dialectic of Problem-Reaction-Solution: pursuing the policies of their own making that have led to this situation in the first place, and then slyly proposing the alleged "solution" to their own problem. These anti-Germans dismiss not only all opposition to mass-immigration as "racist and inhuman," but even the imperative to preserve one's own German people - a natural and acceptable biological desire of any other people. It is unprecedented that elected leaders of a country would openly advocate the extinction of their own people, their own constituents, their own nation - but anyone familiar with the P.C. tyranny would know this is normal in modern Germany.

On 16 November 2011, the self-hating German Social Democratic official Stefanie Drese addressed the State Parliament of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, saying to the approving claps of members of all leading anti-German parties, left/right - SPD, CDU, Die Linke and Die Grünen: "The representatives of the democratic factions, in whose name I speak today, strongly reject the NPD's motion to preserve the biological continuity of the German people. This motion is both racist and inhuman, narrow-minded and backward-looking at the same time, and once again demonstrates in a frightening way the NPD's thought and its intellectual proximity to Nazi ideology."

Let it be said: Identity is not racist, but is a normal biological desire for a people to preserve their own culture and legacy. Rather, it is the desire of self-hating enemies of the German people that IS racist and inhuman! This is also a testament against these political elites, no matter if they represent a "left" or a "right" party, they still hold the German people generally in such open and blatant contempt. But we need not be dissuaded by this enforced genetic suicide. Let us expose these Globalists and their real agenda, and match their tireless agenda with our own resilience to affirm and protect identity!

Atop Birkenkopf in Stuttgart, mit Blick auf das Land meiner Vorfahren ... Meine Inspiration, mein Impuls, meine Sache gegen die Globalisten und Zionisten.

Monday, September 25, 2017

Israeli pundit calls for Jewish-Muslim reconciliation, Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe

Israeli pundit calls for Jewish-Muslim reconciliation, Islamic "cultural domination" of Europe

by Sean Jobst
24 September 2017

Avrum Ehrlich

In an editorial scribbled under the messianic title "When Europe falls to the Arabs, Jerusalem will be silent" (Times of Israel, April 30, 2017), Avrum Ehrlich, an Israeli scholar known for his works on Jewish theology and a staunch advocate for the growing Israeli-Chinese alliance as executive director of the Israel-China Institute and founder of the Israel Chamber of Commerce in China, advocated joint Jewish-Muslim action against Europeans and especially Germans as collective punishment for centuries of perceived "anti-Semitism" (after all, the parallel us vs. them mentality condemns all of them generally as either "goyim" or "kuffar"):

"The implications of Jewish – Arab reconciliation on Germany in particular and Europe in general however are not so bright. The day may still come when Arab extremism ceases its misdirected aggression in the name of Allah and ISIS for a more nuanced critique of Germany and European hypocrisy demonstrated in its ill treatment of Israel. Arabs in Europe may yet say ‘you denigrated our gentle and conciliatory Jewish cousins, killed, disgraced and delegitimized them for nought [sic] and now we, more assertive, less willing sheep for slaughter and mockery, have now replaced them in your lands and we demand recompense for their spilt blood and humiliation’.

"Indeed a future is not far away when Arabs may justify their cultural domination over Europe while championing Israel and demand re appropriation for the centuries of Semitic denigration. They may yet argue that European values are bankrupt, not fit for governance or international respect, not fair or impartial as demonstrated in its record against Israel and therefore the epoch of European ascendency should come to an end."

His narrative is filled with the typical self-righteous Jewish supremacist attitude: The Jews can do no wrong in his eyes, but are merely victims of some genetic vicious "anti-Semitism" held alike by the hosts of all the countries that ultimately expelled them at one time or another in history. He used "Arab" interchangeably with Muslims, as is typical with other articles on that Israeli website. So he referred to an alliance whereby the Muslim migrants could be used against the hated Europeans. He envisioned an Islamic cultural domination over Europe as both to Israel's direct benefit and also as a manifestation of a Judaic vengeance against Europeans and Germans by proxy.

Re-educating the Migrants into Good Little Zionists

Long before the migration crisis, a leading Jewish newspaper in Germany proclaimed: "Immigration primarily is a chance for strengthening Jewish culture in Germany." (Allgemeine Jüdische Wochenzeitschrift, 28 Sept. 2000). In Globalist Sorosian parlance, this is an "open society", a phrase openly touted in a joint article by Dr. Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany - the name itself betraying how such an organization views themselves in Zionist fashion as a foreign element - and World Jewish Congress President Ronald Lauder.

They welcomed such an "open society" because it was "good for Jewry" and evoked the memory of the "Shoah" to continuously guilt-trip the Germans into accepting this mass-immigration. They envisioned curing the migrants of their own "Arab anti-Semitism" and "re-educating" them in the "German" values which they defined as those forced upon the German people since 1945, namely "respect for the values enshrined in the Constitution [actually 'The Basic Law'] and agreeing that support for Israel, rejection of anti-Semitism, and remembrance of the Holocaust, is part of Germany's DNA." (Josef Schuster and Ronald Lauder, "Wir Juden wissen wie bitter Flucht ist," Die Welt, 9 Sept. 2015)

In their redefinition, "Germans" are merely those living within the geographical area of Germany, regardless of race, culture, and lineage or genetic history linking them to that land. This is even while hypocrites such as Schuster and Lauder insist on representing all Jews generally, regardless of where they live. As they gloat in their article: "The Jewish community, both in Germany and worldwide, welcomes this evolution towards an open society."

This was on full display in September 2016, when Rabbi Yehuda Teichtal, Berlin Jewish community rabbi and president of the Chabad Jewish Education Center, arranged a ceremony in honor of a new Torah Scroll received by the Orthodox community at the Münstersche Street Synagogue. The Chabad rally was attended by children of the Jewish community alongside ten young Syrian refugees, joined by their families and by 150 members of the Berlin Jewish community. Following the ceremony at the synagogue, they marched along the streets of Berlin carrying the new Torah scroll. (Tamara Zieve, "Syrian refugees attend Berlin Jewish parade," Jerusalem Post, Sept. 15, 2016)

Make no mistake about this: In Chabad ideology, this is re-educating Gentiles in "Noahide laws", and such a spectacle of arrogant Judaic tribalism within the German capital, with such assertive displays of their support for changing the demographics of Germany, was carefully calculated and deliberate since symbolism is very important in the Kabbalistic ideology of Chabad. The seeds were planted for the current efforts of Ehrlich and others in such a "reconciliation" - but it requires the Arab Muslims to shed themselves of any concern for Palestinians or opposition to Zionism.

Drawing My Line in the Sand

Like many other anti-Zionist activists, I exerted much efforts against the actions of Israel and spoke out constantly in support of the Palestinians. My sympathies remain fully with the Palestinians. I will speak bluntly: We anti-Zionists of European ancestry have generally been the staunchest, most sincere in support of Palestinian rights. Especially because we've seen with the Kalergi Plan-on-steroids, many Muslim leaders and organizations have shown their willingness to jettison even the Palestinian cause when it comes to aligning fully and openly with Zionist-Jewish groups and organizations against the right of indigenous Europeans to their own cultural and demographic integrity in their own ends.

If not for Palestine, how would Jews and Muslims generally get along with each other? Or would the mass of Muslims even care about the Palestinians if the majority didn't happen to be Muslim? And, if the Palestinians were a different religion, wouldn't they fully sympathize with the colonial Jewish "People of the Book" instead of such a native "mushrik" people? The stark answer to that question is being played out on the ground in Europe, where Jewish organizations and leaders have stood at the forefront of promoting mass-immigration from mostly Muslim countries. The natural predilection for the two groups to generally align with each other is also seen by the level to which American Muslim organizations and figures have likewise raised their efforts in supporting any unfettered immigration of Muslims into Western countries, automatically opposing as "racist Islamophobes" anyone who wants to restrict such mass-immigration.

The parallels behind such slander and the age-old slander of "anti-Semitism" are too blatant, as are the open allegiance large sections - if not outright majorities - of Jews and Muslims (specifically referring to those from immigrant backgrounds and even many converts) would make to Israel and the "Umma", respectively, over the European lands that host them. (I reject generalities, but I am referring to a collective group as a group-think guided by political pressure groups, not individuals.) The arrogance such an attitude breeds is manifested in such a sentiment as Ehrlich's conclusion: "Germany be warned you are weighed in the balances and are found wanting! Europe take heed, repent or become a footnote in the history of peoples. Thus says the Lord of Hosts."

I will be blunt: Anyone who supports the mass-immigration into Europe, promoted as it is by leading Zionist-Jewish figures and organizations, are only "anti-Zionist" insofar as it comes to the Arabs and Muslims, but are willing to ally with Zionism wherever the shared target is indigenous Europeans. Although always aware of my heritage, setting foot the last two summers on my ancestral lands have awoken something deep within me as I now affirm and stand up more and more determined, against the Kalergi Plan and other anti-European agendas....just as I similarly oppose those misguided and treacherous efforts that reduce our peoples to cannon-fodder and tax-slaves for Israel's wars or to prop up the debt machine of international bankers. A line has been drawn in the sand.

"The Rape of Europa" by Titian, circa 1560-1562

"The Rape of Europa" by Sebastiano Conca, 18th-century

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Extremist Rabbis: Talmudic prophecies call for destruction of Europe, war between Christians and Muslims

Extremist Rabbis: Talmudic prophecies call for destruction of Europe, war between Christians and Muslims

by Sean Jobst
15 August 2017

We are living in chaotic times when events in the world are often couched in religious terms of "end times," given an apocalyptic explanation that especially becomes dangerous for the world when its politicized and backed by armed groups. Whether the modern fanatics of ISIS carrying out their blood-drenched reign of terror throughout Syria and Iraq, or the Evangelical Rapture enthusiasts who want to use U.S. foreign policy to hasten "the second coming," much has been written in mainstream media. Far less attention is focused on Jewish extremists that promote a very politically-influential, supremacist agenda of hate and vengeance against entire nations. This is especially pertinent with the mass-migration crisis in Europe and the disproportionate Jewish role in promoting the Kalergi Plan.

Rabbi Baruch Efrati is head of a yeshiva and the community rabbi of the West Bank settlement of Efrat. He is not some fringe rabbi; he heads the "Derech Emunah" (Way of Torah) movement of leading Israeli Orthodox rabbis, and is frequently interviewed as an authority by Israeli media. In a November 2012 sermon that was uploaded online and quoted in Israeli media, Efrati said:

"Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile there. We will never forgive Europe's Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly. Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity.

"And now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won't be able to atone for. With the help of God, the Gentiles there will adopt a healthier life with a lot of modesty and integrity, and not like the hypocritical Christianity which appears pure but is fundamentally corrupt. Even if we are in a major war with the region's Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a Gentile culture than Christianity."

In a sermon uploaded directly to his Liveleak account on 20 November 2013, Rabbi David Touitou, a French-speaking Haredi rabbi based out of Ashdod, Israel (according to his Facebook) and appears to be connected to the Jewish supremacist Chabad movement, proclaimed:

"You will pay dearly for it Europeans! To such an extent that you have no idea! And you will have no place to run to. Because all the evil you have done to Israel [the Jews], you will pay for it a hundred-fold. When Italy will be gone, when Edom (that is why Christianity's headquarters, which come from 'Hessal', is there), when that place will be gone, and that's what Islam is going to do. Islam is the broom of Israel, you have to know it. So, instead of having us do all the job, He sends Ishmael to solve the problem. When he is going to clean all this and that the wine will come back home, then it's Melah Ramachiar(?).

"The war of God and Magog, this furious war that we are all waiting for. The Rafet Israim(?) said: 'Do not expect to see anything other than Islam stand up against Edom [Europe/Christendom].' According to the Rafet Israim(?), the Gog and Magog war is that Islam in Europe will rise as one man and they have everything to succeed. This war in the world we live in is necessary. Why is it necessary? Because one is going to use the other so that Israel does not enter war, and this will cause Ishmael [Arab world] to rise against Islam.

"What you are undergoing in France, in Europe, which is so scary, it should be for us the most beautiful news of our Jewish history. Finally, we begin to approach it! Finally, we begin to realize what the sages had predicted before. What I told you before is written in Sanhedrin [book of the Talmud]. The Messiah will come only when Edom, Europe, Christianity will have fallen completely. So, I am asking you the question: Is it good news that Islam is invading Europe? It's excellent news! It's announcing the arrival of the Messiah! Excellent news!"

In the same compilation video, another French-speaking Haredi rabbi said: "And that at the end of time everyone will see his account settled. Great carnage will be prepared in the country of Edom (Rome). It is a day of vengeance for the eternal year of retaliation for the cause of Sion. All of this is written by the Prophet Isaiah."

These are stunning admissions, especially in light of the mass-migration of mostly Muslim migrants into Europe that has been promoted from the top-bottom by Jewish bankers and politicians, NGOs, think-tanks and organizations - even while solidifying the exclusively Jewish character of Israel. The main reason behind this is revealed by these rabbis: a deep-seated hatred of Europeans, whom they collectively blame for centuries of "anti-Semitism". Another reason is a "clash of civilizations," wars between Christians and Muslims for the benefit of Zionism.

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt is a Lithuanian-born Haredi rabbi, with close ties to both Putin and Israeli-Russian oligarch and politician, Arkady Gaydamak. He now serves as president of the Conference of European Rabbis. "There is a clash of civilizations, and we the Jews are in the middle of this clash of civilizations," Goldschmidt said in an interview on Russia Today's "Worlds Apart" show in February 2015. Condemning "the reaction of the old Europe," he noted that while Jews and Muslims fight in the Middle East: "We see ourselves fighting with our Muslim brothers, who want a free Europe, a peaceful Europe, who want to integrate like our forefathers integrated in western Europe 100, 200 years ago, and they are our natural allies."

The Proverbial "Rome" as Symbolic Antithesis to Judaism

In two of the statements above, "Rome" is specifically mentioned as being "destroyed," of course in a gloating schadenfreude. Part of this is being the symbolic home of the Roman Catholic Church, but it goes deeper than that. In the popular Jewish consciousness, Rome was the destroyer of the Temple of Jerusalem, which over two millennium later is still lamented and remembered. Even the term "Gentile" comes directly from the Latin "gens," race - the word used by the Romans to describe themselves. So that which is different from Jews is regarded as "Roman," as the Jewish historian Josef Kastein (1890-1946) writes:

"To the Jews, Rome constituted the quintessence of all that was odious and should be swept away from off the face of the earth. They hated Rome and her device, arma et leges, with an inhuman hatred. True, Rome had leges, laws, like the Jews. But in their very resemblance lay their very difference; for the Roman laws were merely the practical application of the arma, the arms....but without the arms, the leges were empty formulae." (Josef Kastein, History and Destiny of the Jews, Garden City, NY: Garden City Publishing Company, 1936, p. 192)

Similarly, ISIS and many Islamic extremists of the Wahhabi and Muslim Brotherhood streams, often evoke hadith prophecies about "the conquest of Rome." The presence of such extremists among many of the migrants flowing into Europe is an accepted fact, so holding on to such prophecies about Rome brings greater significance to Efrati and Touitou's statements about Jews benefitting from the mass-immigration of Muslims into Europe, pitting the two against each other and seeing another people displace and replace the "anti-Semitic" Europeans. Rabbi Goldschmidt evoked such a "clash of civilizations." Henry H. Klein (1879-1955) was a Jewish attorney who exposed Zionist and Communist machinations, earning him enmity from other Jews. He warned even before the State of Israel was founded:

"Political Zionism is an agency of Big Business. It is being used by Jewish and Christian financiers in this country and Great Britain, to make Jews believe that Palestine will be ruled by a descendent of King David who will ultimately rule the world. What seclusion! It will lead to war between Arabs and Jews and eventually to war between Moslems and non-Moslems. That will be the turning point of history." (Henry H. Klein, A Jew Warns Jews, 1947)

Sigmund Freud on "Semitic" Revenge Against Rome

The founder of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), was motivated by his Jewishness. "In print and in public, Freud insists, with the voice of the wounded savant, that psychoanalysis is a science like any other and has nothing to do with Jewishness. In person an in private, however, he identifies psychoanalysis, with the voice of the prophet militant, as a Jewish creation and possession. One of Freud's most powerful motives in life was the desire to inflict vengeance on Christianity for its traditional anti-Semitism." (Thomas Szasz, The Myth of Psychotherapy: Mental Healing as Religion, Rhetoric, and Repression, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1978, p. 146). As Freud wrote in The Interpretation of Dreams:

"I had actually been following in Hannibal's footsteps. Like him, I had been fated not to see Rome; and he too had moved into the Campagna when everyone had expected him in Rome. But Hannibal, whom I had come to resemble in those respects, had been the favorite hero of my later school days. Like so many boys of that age, I had sympathized in the Punic Wars not with the Romans but with the Carthaginians. And when in the higher classes I began to understand for the first time what it meant to belong to an alien race, and anti-Semitic feelings among the other boys warned me that I must take up a definite position, the figure of the Semitic general rose still higher in my esteem. To my youthful mind Hannibal and Rome symbolized the conflict between the tenacity of Jewry and the organization of the Catholic Church. And the increasing importance of the effects of the anti-Semitic movement upon our emotional life helped to fix the thoughts and feelings of those early days. At that point I was brought up against the event in my youth whose power was still being shown in my dreams.

"I may have been ten or twelve years old, when my father began to take me with him on his walks and reveal to me in his talk his views upon things in the world we live in. Thus, it was on one such occasion that he told me a story to show me how much better things were now than they had been in his days. 'When I was a young man,' he said, 'I went for a walk one Saturday in the streets of your birthplace; I was well dressed, and had a new fur cap on my head. A Christian came up to me and with a single blow knocked off my cap into the mud and shouted: 'Jew! get off the pavement!' 'And what did you do?' I asked. 'I went into the roadway and picked up my cap,' was his quiet reply. This struck me as unheroic conduct on the part of the big, strong man who was holding the little boy by the hand. I contrasted this situation with another which fitted my feelings better: the scene in which Hannibal's father, Hamilcar Barca, made his boy swear before the household altar to take vengeance on the Romans. Ever since that time, Hannibal had had a place in my phantasies." (Cited in ibid., pp. 146-147)

The Hungarian-born psychoanalyst Thomas Szasz (1920-2012), himself Jewish, analyzes Freud's statement: "Hannibal, the African - whom Freud calls a 'Semite' - takes vengeance on the Romans who conquered and humiliated the Carthaginians. Freud, the Semite, takes vengeance on the Christians who conquered and humiliated the Jews. Hannibal was tenacious and had a secret weapon: elephants. Freud, too, was tenacious and he, too, had a secret weapon: psychoanalysis. Hannibal's elephants terrorized his enemies whom the animals then trampled to death. Freud's psychoanalysis terrorized his enemies whom his 'interpretations' then degraded into the carriers of despicable diseases. The story of Freud's life and the story of psychoanalysis in his lifetime are variations on the theme of justified vengeance in the pattern not only of the legendary Hannibal but also of the literary Count of Monte Cristo: the humiliated but morally superior victim escapes from dependence on his morally inferior victimizers; he hides, schemes, and grows powerful; he returns to the scene of his defeat, and there remorselessly humiliates and subjugates his erstwhile victimizers as they had humiliated and subjugated him." (ibid., p. 147)

Israeli Nuclear Threats Against Europe

The Dutch-Israeli military historian Martin van Crevald, made a general nuclear threat against Europe, specifically mentioning Rome: "We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: 'Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.'...Our armed forces are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but the second or third. We have the capacity to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under." (Elsevier Weekblad, Amsterdam, 27 April 2002, no. 17, pp. 52-53; cited in David Hirst, "The war game," The Observer/The Guardian, 20 September 2003)

Displacement, Replacement, Emigration

The Kalergi Plan cannot be understood without the Oded Yinon Plan. The Israeli destabilization of the Levant, as well as the IMF/World Bank undermining of economies throughout Africa and the Middle East, is directly linked with the Kalergi Plan to bring large numbers of mostly Muslims from those regions, to weaken the ethnic, cultural and economic foundations of Europe. The failure to recognize the relationship means serving Zionist objectives: On the one hand, the Muslims and others who promote mass-immigration into Europe; on the other hand, the Europeans and Westerners who promote more wars for Israel and the bankers.

Will the Islamic presence in Europe mean a backlash against Jews? Certainly, Ariel Sharon thought so: "Since the Moslemic [sic] presence in Europe grows by the day, the life of Jews will surely be threatened." (Die Welt, 25 November 2003, p. 17). However, as noted by the rabbinical statements cited above, there is a more deeply-seated hatred and vengeance against European peoples held by many Jews, to the extent many prefer Muslims. Lawrence Auster, a Jewish convert to Christianity, wrote in the Zionist/Neocon Front Page Magazine: "There is something that many American Jews fear in their heart of hearts even more than they fear Moslem anti-Semitism, and that is white Christian anti-Semitism." (Lawrence Auster, "Why Jews Welcome Muslims," FrontPageMagazine.com, June 22, 2004)

Corollary to all of this is the increasing demographic crisis within Israel. There is a growing disillusionment with Zionism among many younger Israelis, with such factors as high prices, compulsory military service, and a high poverty rate. Many young Israelis now have a second passport, often European, Canadian or American. An increasing number that have emigrated from Israel haven't returned to Israel. As Stephen Landman writes, "Israelis want out." Some of this has been mitigated by increasing Jewish immigration from Russia, with these immigrants playing many influential roles within Israel and being catalysts for Israel's intensifying alliance with Putin. So that some of the population figures have been reversed.

"Three million to four million maybe altogether, it could change the geopolitics," Israeli Rabbi Dov Maimon, author of The Absorption Plan, said in an interview with Vice News in 2016. "The demography is the key to everything, as you know. Between Jordan and the Mediterranean, these are borders [for] 10 million people, about half [of them] Jews and half [of them] Arabs. And if we want to remain a democratic state, we have to have a majority of Jews in this place." When asked if immigrants could shift the balance, he replied: "Absolutely, sure. Already the birth rate among Arabs is decreasing and the birth rate among Jews is increasing, so it's already a change. The train of history is on its way."

Many Jews in France and other European countries are also floating the idea of immigrating to Israel. These Jewish leaders specifically cite the rising number of "anti-Semitic" actions in Europe, many of them I'd suspect are false-flags designed to goad the Jews into Israel. Certainly, its accepted fact that Haganah committed bombings against Iraqi Jews in 1951 to goad Iraqi Jews into Israel, and then there is also the Mossad's involvement in the Lavon Affair in Egypt in the mid-1950s. So there is a precedence, and what better way than to instill fear into the Jewish masses of Europe? A presence of Jews in the United States and Russia is regarded as more important for Zionist objectives, given those countries being more powerful, so Jewish financial and political influence can be utilized for Israel.

Despite contrary belief, Zionism is not only about the ingathering of Jews into Palestine. They still require a certain number of Jews in more powerful countries so as to influence their policies for Israel. But those Jews in other countries are goaded into leaving for Israel, even if it requires false flag attacks and staged "anti-Semitism" to do so. This is because the expansionist dictates of the Israeli state need a steady number of Jewish immigrants to settle lands and build more settlements. The Israelis are solidifying their control over the West Bank and Jawlan Heights demographically, by bringing in more Jewish settlers to change the facts on the ground.

Europe is at a crisis because of the migration crisis and the terrorist attacks - many of them genuine but many others false-flags that benefit Israel. On 28 July 2014, Knesset member and former Deputy Director of Shin Bet, the Israeli internal security service, Yisrael Hasson, spoke at an "urgent meeting" of a Knesset committee on the situation of Jews in Europe: "If European countries fail to protect their Jews, the State of Israel will. Jewish blood is not cheap blood." He then made a veiled threat to a group of European diplomats from nine countries, warning them that if their countries did not stand with Israel, "the day when Islamic terror will reach your homes, your beds, and your kindergartens will come soon."


Flag Counter