Wednesday, November 11, 2020

A Coup by Any Other Name is still a Coup - Decoding the Election Realities

by Sean Jobst

11 November 2020





   Count me as one more person calling out the election shenanigens. Whatever one may think about voting itself, I reject this blatant attempt by the political establishment, corrupt city Democratic Party machines, corporate media, and Big Tech billionaires to declare the winner. They are falling over themselves anointing Biden and Harris, even as no state has certified their results, margins remain very small in several key states, and evidence continues to mount of improprieties (if not outright fraud) in the very states that apparently tipped the balance. Repeating that something doesn't exist, with the media corporations and Big Tech working overtime in openly discounting it, does not change reality.

   The same Covid they used as the excuse to slip in this massive mail-in voting system - obviously more prone to numbers manipulating and not as verifiable as in-person voting - instantly evaporated as masses of TDS sufferers celebrated in city streets across the nation, literally dropping their masks in the process. So invested were all their energies into hating Trump, as if his very existence triggered all their emotions so their own existence depended on him, that these low-information voters would overlook the actual records of the demented jester and the psychopath opportunist. Such voters endorsed even if ignorantly, the millions of lives killed or destroyed by their various warmongering, Police State, authoritarian policies. 

   There are two components here. One are the growing calls for Trump to "concede" coupled with the congratulations going to Biden/Harris, from various Neocons and Establishment figures. The likes of Bush and Romney who represent the same Corporatist, Police State, Warmongering consensus as Biden/Harris. Attorney Benjamin Ginsburg, who had been National Counsel to the presidential campaigns of Bush/Cheney and Romney, has openly aligned with the pro-Biden media establishment. We witnessed a political shift these last four years, disrupting the two parties. On one side is this disgusting alliance of Corporatists, Neocons, and Leftists coalescing around the anointed ones. On the other side are such drifts as the #WalkAway movement and the traditionally "Democratic" demographics Trump outperformed with. I'll speak more on this in future articles, but the important thing to note is those forces coalescing around Biden/Harris is an augury for what we could expect from such an Administration - but some disruption of the establishment. 





   The second component is the mounting evidence of various improprieties in the actual voting process - that the media and other Establishment simply won't even consider it and repeat their denials like the Big Lie technique doesn't change the actual evidence. They are pulling a bait-and-switch upon the American people, knowing full well that so many will be lulled into sleep by this charm - oblivious to how the process actually works beyond prepackaged media mantras. Indeed, its no accident the vote totals of the crucial states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Arizona froze in time roughly around "Witching Hour" in the eastern half of the country (3-4 am), as ridiculously high levels of mail-in votes started to tip the scales in these states for Biden. 

   Those differences in mail-in ballots just happened to be most evident in three states - Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia - that have no rule forcing machine ballot totals to be hand-checked by paper. There was less of a mail-in vote disparity between Trump and Biden in states which tabulated their totals on election night. Only in these pre-dawn hours was Biden getting vote totals of 90-100% in these holdout states, against all mathematical probability. The conservative Judicial Watch noted voter registration rates exceeding 100% in 353 counties in 29 states totaling 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens - make what you will about their report, but certainly they aren't inherently less believable than the liberal/leftist MSM with its own blatant bias. Voter registration and turnout numbers reached not just improbable but outright impossible numbers. 

   A precinct in Orange County, Florida, reported a registered voter turnout of 102%. The University of Central Florida reported a whopping 107.56%. The total "exceeded 100%" in Oconto County, Wisconsin. Then there was the over 100% results in many Milwaukee suburbs: "a data anomaly created by new voter registrations on top of near-total participation among voters who had registered in advance of Election Day." This exceeds even countries like Australia where voting is compulsory, but are taken as indicators of "vote rigging" in other countries. Biden's votes in most cities across the country were lower than Hillary's in 2016, yet we're supposed to believe he had massive turnout in just these cities in states leading for Trump up until these pre-dawn hours? Statisticians and mathematicians noted the numbers in these crucial places violated Benford's Law against all numerical possibilities. This law states that "any random numbers will have a specific result as to which digits appear first in each data set." When anomalies occur despite this law, its taken as a tell-tale sign of numbers being manipulated. Mark Twain's old adage about "lies, damned lies, and statistics" has never been more true.





   Back in August, even the New York Times and other MSM outlets admitted mail-in fraud in a Patterson, New Jersey election on May 12th, although it quickly denied potential "national trouble" to put lingering skepticism to rest. A city councilman and three others were caught in what even CNN called "voter fraud". In September, a whistleblower exposed ballot harvesting in Minneapolis, during a 38-day period when the law allowing for an unlimited number was being challenged. Then in October, there were MSM reports about a fraudster caught registering dead people in Broward County, Florida; thousands of people requesting ballots that never arrived in a Pennsylvania county that just happened to favor Trump; and a mayoral candidate was caught forging 84 voter applications in Carrollton, Texas. Are we to serious believe this entire system worked out its flaws by election night, with absolutely "no evidence" of improprieties? In just one case, a Texas social worker was recently caught submitting 67 voter registrations without the signatures and consent of the residents at an assisted living facility.

   In a campaign video released on 24 October 2020, Biden said: "We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." It was picked up as a stunning admission by one side, while the MSM quickly ran cover for him - saying it was taken out of context and he was merely referring to an organization to prevent voter fraud. I agree that despite his long record of gaffes, the 47-year career politician is slick enough to not make such a admission. But what his defenders are missing - and I wish many on the Trump side would be careful with running away with information, too - is the fact that Biden alluded to any possible voter fraud in the first place. That he would outright suggest there is a possible voter fraud, despite the categorical dismissals now by his campaign and its backers, would suggest they would be singing a different tune if election night turned out a different way than the current deadlocked result declared Biden's way.





   This is the same cognitive dissonance of people who tout their "international" perspective, revealing themselves to be projecting exceptionalists to deny there can be corruption in America; that these political party machines are products of other countries but not America. Yet even this claim is selective, as seen by their partisan outcry about the 2016 election and the chain of politically-motivated investigations that flopped. Media corporations should not be the ones calling and deciding elections. The way they cover these elections, for example calling some states one way and others "too close to call" even while both examples have the same type of numbers, shows its partisan and arbitrary. Perhaps the masses of TDS-sufferers who tout their "social justice" credentials don't have a problem (so long as they finance their own favored causes), but I certainly have a problem with billionaires and oligarchs peddling so much influence in our society. The media's modus operandi has been to deny and dismiss all allegations of election fraud in this election, while refusing to even investigate it.

   We have seen a string of anecdotal evidence throughout this year that appears to be some kind of bureaucratic coup - bloodless (not counting the deaths caused by "peaceful protests") but a coup none the less. In June, we witnessed the Transition Integrity Project, a simulation that favored Biden and convened under the claim that Trump would "seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process." The simulation was organized by Rosa Brooks, a former counselor to Biden foreign policy advisor Michèle Flournoy during the Obama Administration. Her other listed affiliations include the World Economic Forum, Council on Foreign Relations, and former Special Counsel to George Soros' Open Society Institute, who has spoken there on the subject of "America is in a constant state of war." Other participants in the simulation included Clinton advisor John Podesta, former chairs of the Democratic and Republican National Committees (Donna Brazile and Michael Steele), and three leading Neocons (William Kristol, Max Boot, David Frum). Boot touted it as a "war game" in the Washington Post. In October, liberal war-monger and former CFR Senior Fellow Peter Beinart called for "international intervention" if Trump refused to "concede" the election.

   On the eve of the election, leftist activist group ShutDown DC hosted a Zoom call that was a "training session" for various government employees affiliated with the Sunrise Movement, a pro-Green New Deal activist group affiliated with both Extinction Rebellion and Democratic Socialists. They openly spoke about "leaking" information from their various departments and agencies in an effort to "sabotage", one of the "facilitators" on the video openly saying: "It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not." Maria Stephan, an academic and activist who has openly spoken on the need for "regime change" through civil resistance, appeared on the call boasting of their power as bureaucrats: "The bottom line is that we all - as ordinary people, um, and as federal workers - have power. If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar, and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process." Are we to believe they haven't coordinated efforts with untold numbers of other ideological subversives within government agencies, including some involved in handling and counting ballots? 




   This latter proposition is the most significant - it need only be part of the chain of command in certain post office branches or poll stations to have affected the results in some precincts. The ongoing lawsuit that the MSM automatically dismisses by refusing to consider it at all, includes no less than seventy eyewitnesses who signed affidavits under penalty of perjury, stating they witnessed voting irregularities. One Nevada whistleblower alleged that Clark County supervisors counted mail-in ballots with no concern whether the signatures were valid. Another claimed poll workers fabricated proof of residence for voters who had moved outside Nevada. Municipal clerks and votes counters across Wisconsin were accused of unlawfully altering thousands of ballots, including filling out signatures themselves. In a video that appears suppressed down the Memory Hole, a Michigan whistleblower who worked at the Barlow branch of the Traverse City post office told Project Veritas: "We were issued a directive this morning [November 4th] to collect any ballots we find in mailboxes, collection boxes, just outgoing mail in general. Separate them at the end of the day so that they could hand stamp them from standard letter mail so they can hand stamp them with yesterday's date [election day] and put them through." 

   An FBI agent was exposed intimidating Pennsylvania USPS whistleblower Richard Hopkins, who also said ballots were back-dated to election day. Hopkins has publicly refuted notions that he "recanted" as was claimed by the Washington Post in an obvious coordination between media and bureaucracy. Poll watchers were being obstructed from many stations in Michigan and Pennsylvania, contrary to election laws that allow for those observers. This includes some stations in Detroit that were covering their windows so no one could see the counting process. What is there to hide? With both Wisconsin and Michigan going heavily for Trump on election night, vote dumps early Wednesday morning went 100% for Biden. This includes a magical trove of 138,339 votes in Michigan, which was censored by Twitter. A losing county commissioner in Rochester Hills, MI, was re-elected after a glitch was discovered that changed a 1,127-vote win into a 104-vote loss. A Virginia data scientist tweeted pictures of a software glitch in her state that made 169,000 votes disappear within thirty minutes.

   At the center of the election-day glitches were voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems, a Canadian-based multinational corporation whose lobbying firm is Brownstein, Farber Hyatt & Schreck, which just so happens to be associated with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's former chief-of-staff, Nadeam Elshami. Dominion's machines are installed across the country, including the crucial states of Michigan and Georgia. A Michigan county clerk found that 6,000 votes for Trump, were instead counted for Biden in Antrim County. That glitch was discovered and fixed, but the same machines are used in 47 counties across Michigan. There is something within the software that "skewed" the results. Georgia "rushed" to install Dominion's machines ahead of election day and, just as with Michigan, there have been glitches. A report by Fox5 Atlanta noted a glitch that delayed the counting of 80,000 absentee ballots in Gwinnett County, yet officials went through with the results anyway; it reported the same glitch occurred earlier that morning in Spalding and Morgan Counties. These are just the glitches that were caught, but how many more in other counties and states went ahead with the results that perhaps skewed it in favor of Biden?




   The ongoing lawsuit the MSM won't even consider has brought evidence from 11,000 people documenting various incidents of fraud. Contrary to that state's own election laws, Pennsylvania officials processed 450,000 mail-in-ballots while Republican observers were kept away from polling stations. The state's Democratic Attorney General, Josh Shapiro, already called Pennsylvania for Biden in a Tweet three days before the election: "If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose." John Fetterman, the state's Bernie "Democratic Socialist" Lieutenant-Governor, told CNN in September: "I believe Pennsylvania will pick the President." We can make of these statements what we will, but certainly it lends credence to a concerted effort to sway the election towards Biden. They were acting as activists, not elected officials. 

   In 2019, the Pennsylvania legislature passed Act 77 which required all mail-in ballots be received by 8pm election night when the polls officially close: "No absentee ballot under this subsection shall be counted which is received in the office of the county board of elections later than eight o'clock P.M. on the day of the primary or election." Rather than striking down this law, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set up its own law by a vote of 4-3, that mail-in-ballots need only be postmarked by election day but allowing them to be received afterwards. Are these the sort of parallel institutions and laws advocated in the Zoom call? The U.S. Constitution itself is unequivocal that the election law this instance is with the elected legislature and not the appointed judges: "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators." (U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1)

   We don't know how this will play out. There are checks and balances in these United States for a reason, to limit the powers of one branch over another. Yet what we are seeing here is unprecedented, a massive mail-in-ballot system that was rushed through this year using Covid as the excuse. That system has been prone to various manipulations as the ample evidence above has demonstrated. Established rules were repeatedly violated throughout this process in several locations. Glitches being discovered should cast suspicion on some of the counts in other areas that use those same types of machines. We witnessed the behavior of certain bureaucrats and activists establishing contingency plans and stating certain things before the election that shouldn't be outside the realm of projecting what they intended to do themselves. There is one other thing we should remember this Veteran's Day: Civil servants, media corporations, and TV talking-heads do not call or determine elections in this constitutional Republic. We stand at the precipice now and our due vigilance is needed now more than ever. 


No comments:

Post a Comment