Analysis of the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Cui Bono? A Cultural and Political Overview (Part 1)

By Sean Jobst

24 Sept. 2025

I write this with two initial thoughts. First, when so many human lives are lost daily around the world, including what's committed in Gaza with our extorted labor and income, why focus on one life while others become nameless statistics passed over in the news-cycle? For example, the murder of Iryna Zarutska and other acts of violence (with what those often entail of anarcho-tyranny - an unequal application of “the law” according to the whims of State authorities) etc.. Second, not to just react to events but respond, especially with the flimsy narrative being pushed and squeezed for all its worth by certain forces who stand to benefit the most while deflecting from more meaningful directions. Yet the more I have learned about the Charlie Kirk assassination, the more I am convinced of its significance. 

The assassination reveals the depths to which the Israeli State and Israel-First billionaires will go to manufacture continued support in the USA. That support has been rapidly slipping and more noticing their stranglehold, as well as the shameful subservience of government and media to their every whim. We have seen their going-for-broke phase, where previous disguises are dropped in a blunt display of barbarity towards their Greater Israel project, with all that entails of genocide and expansionism. To achieve this they would need the continued support of American superpower to prop up their Warfare/Welfare State, so we are at their accelerationist phase. Regarding the assassination, we uncover a story of intrigues and financial pressure; of shameless exploitation and narcissistic depravity. It also reveals much about the billionaire class, role of donors, culture war distractions, and humiliation rituals. 

Events within a week of the assassination reveals Zionist influence becoming more blatant and desperate. On the same day as the assassination, the Senate voted to suppress the Epstein files which would obviously implicate Israeli intelligence and billionaires of the MEGA Group. The House passed the latest iteration of the NDAA on the 11th, including a provision to punish BDS efforts by contractors, and giving an extra $650 million to Israel (in addition to the billions it already receives). On the 13th, Florida Representative Brian Mast – who served in the Israeli Death Forces (IDF) and often wears his uniform even in the US Congress – introduced a bill to revoke passports from Americans critical of Israel (including myself). It was withdrawn only after public outcry, but clearly their plan remains.

On the 14th, Secretary of State Marco Rubio dropped everything he was doing to grovel to Israel and take the humiliation ritual at the Wall. Having received marching orders from Mileikowsky, he traveled on to confer with Syrian and Qatari leaders to ensure their complicity with Israel. From the 14th to 18th, the largest-ever US delegation was sent to Israel, with 250 bipartisan state legislators forming a “50 States One Israel” syndicate. These are the shameless cucks being groomed as future senators, representatives, and governors. For example, one of them is the AIPAC billionaires’ anointed puppet to challenge pro-American Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie. No amount of imagined “Rainbows” could ever cover the ignominy of these treasonous lackeys. On the 18th, Israeli ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter called efforts to block US weapons to Israel a “blood libel”, vomiting the same robotic Zionist trite.

On the 16th, Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman (much more about him later) was in Israel attending the University of Haifa honorary diploma event. “I think there is a radicalization that has happened globally and it only takes one bad actor to have such a tragedy,” he told an Israeli news channel, visibly smirking with glee at the opportunities to exploit Kirk’s death. “This may be a very important catalyst. While his death is a tragedy, he hopefully will not die in vain.” On the 17th, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson held a “private meeting” with AIPAC officials to pledge he would screen out “isolationists” from the Republican Party. That is, to root out critics of Israel such as Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene, ensuring compliance behind the Israel-First dogma. Another official privy to this meeting revealed “he’d been texting recently with Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt about the proliferation of antisemitic conspiracy theories about the killing of influencer Charlie Kirk.”

Establishing a precedent

“Lucius Cassius, whom the Roman people thought to be the truest and wisest judge, was accustomed to repeatedly asking in cases ‘to whom it would have benefited' [cui bono fuisset]. Such is the life of men that no one should attempt to commit a crime without hope and gain.” – Cicero, Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino, 84.

“We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way of being traced back to Israel. Shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain in our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay, we're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our stage.” - Mossad agent with the pseudonym "Michael," in an interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes,” Dec. 2024. Also widely reported and corroborated by Israeli media.

“We’ve pushed back against the media on Covid, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border. So maybe we should also ask the question: Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question that maybe we shouldn’t believe everything the media says, because I know I’ve been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse, some people in the Israeli government are saying….” – Charlie Kirk, speaking on his show  with Ben Shapiro, 9 Sept. 2025 – just the day before his assassination. In the clip which is widely available across the Internet, we can clearly see Shapiro with raised eyebrows and shocked that Kirk would even question the narrative.

Without a doubt blessed with charisma and organizing talents, Charlie Kirk built up Turning Point USA into a leading force of American conservatism, a grassroots student organization with thousands of chapters across the nation. This is neither an endorsement nor condemnation – I’m simply stating this fact as a libertarian/anarchist outsider to the dialectic who agreed with some of his views and disagreed with others. I don’t understand the appeal of debating culture war slop, repeating the same talking points and focused on “owning” the debate opponent. Although I do support the forum of open exchange of ideas. Not surprising given the focus on culture war distractions, 90% of his initial funding came from the Zionist David Horowitz Freedom Center, as Kirk admitted in a tweet from April 2025. “Without David Horowitz, I’m not sure Turning Point USA would exist,” he wrote in eulogy for the late Trotskyite-turned-Zionist Neocon financier.

This was an apparent Faustian bargain where, in exchange for promoting Israeli Hasbara as the gospel truth, Kirk could have free rein to debate culture war issues. Indeed, its no accident he founded TPUSA in 2012, just as Woke critical theory infiltrated the culture from the top-down, spreading through Corporate media and academic institutions heavily funded by Big Corporations and shadowy Deep State 'NGOs' and think-tanks.(1) Previously confined to fringe academic institutions, these theories were then astroturfed into the ether because Occupy Wall Street had struck fear into the billionaire class and Managerial State, especially because it was a grassroots cause uniting “Left” and “Right” into a common fight against the Banksters’ predatory looting and the State bailing them out with our labor and income (similar to propping up the Israeli Warfare/Welfare State).

These "cultural" issues largely irrelevant to the lives of most people were dusted off from obscurity or even fabricated to distract from these economic issues. And it worked as a charm, as Occupy was hijacked and completely neutered by Woke.(2) Just as those Corporate interests financed Woke Critical Theory, even going back to the earliest roots of the Frankfurt School, so too would they craft its antithesis. These financiers closely set the debate parameters, entrenching two sides of an astroturfed dialectic where nuance and consistency were alien. This created the immature political discourse which degenerated into a low-IQ dialectic of screeching "Nazi" and "Fascist", or an overcompensating impulse to "Own the Libs". 

Four stages of Trump's buffoonery in the Epstein cover-up

The same trajectory repeated itself this past year, with growing consensus uniting much of the American Left and Right around two core demands: End this shameful subservience to Israel and extorting our income to prop it up and wage its genocide and expansionism; and release the full Epstein files (not photo-ops rehashing some files already in the public for years). The money of Zionist billionaires, ill-gotten through cultural decadence (such as the Adelson casino wealth or vulture firms of John Paulson, Paul Singer, etc.) has been funneled around to stem this tide. One of the most disreputable of all is Bill Ackman, whose name keeps coming up as the billionaire who threatened Kirk after daring to ask questions and platform “anti-Semitic” voices such as Tucker Carlson (who publicly shamed Ackman as a mediocre who conned his way to $9 billion). Furthermore, Kirk rejected Netanyahu's funding offer, increasingly realizing he could never be independent with his own thoughts. And so the donors who primarily funded him because of Israel came to collect on the Faustian bargain.

Alongside others of his orbit such as Carl Icahn and Paul Singer, Ackman profited immensely  from the credit-default swaps that crashed and restructured the economy in 2008. He was one of the most vocal architects of State bailouts of “too big to fail” banks. In March 2020, he called for lockdowns and was platformed by CNBC, fearmongering that “shutdown is inevitable.” Once panicked investors sold their stocks, he swooped in and bought up those stocks for $27 million, walking off with a $2.6 billion profit using the same type of credit-default swaps as 2008. Thus he became one of the robber-barons who promoted the State denying millions of people their livelihoods, so that his fellow billionaires could enjoy the greatest redistribution of wealth given them by those State institutions. And its no coincidence so many of these billionaires are leading advocates and financiers of pro-Israel causes.

Ackman is one of the billionaires who initially supported BLM, DEI programs, and jab mandates, but only turned against Woke after 7th October 2023, when so much of the Woke Left took critical theory seriously enough to also apply it against Israel.(3) After that he remade his image as “anti-DEI crusader”, making war upon universities and threatening to withhold funding unless they suppress free speech about Israel – and they caved in. As with other “anti-Woke” billionaires he merely wanted to replace those programs with new DEI that extolled Jews as a privileged class over all others, slipped through as special efforts to “protect” Jewish students from alleged “anti-Semitism” (never mind that so many of the pro-Palestine protestors were themselves Jewish). He has since used his ill-gotten wealth to further Israeli subversion in the United States, funding many conservative “influencers” out of their mediocre obscurity to build artificial platforms towing the party line on Israel. Many of those same “influencers” were present at the Hamptons meeting where Ackman threatened Kirk, as substantiated by the work of Candace Owens and Max Blumenthal (whom I trust infinitely more than the fraudster Ackman and his astroturfed Zio-robots reading off the same script). 

The Trump White House and its shills have seized upon distraction after distraction over the Epstein files, to protect that Israeli intelligence and Deep State blackmail operation and the MEGA Group financing those and other subversions. None of these distractions seemed to stick – until the Charlie Kirk assassination, which happened to be the same day the Senate voted to suppress the Epstein files and the day before the 9/11 anniversary, with renewed cultural skepticism about the narrative of that fateful day in 2001 (and the resulting endless wars for Israel). Using the same format as its Epstein coverup, the White House has shamelessly exploited Kirk's death to push through more assaults upon free speech. And once the precedence is established, it will only expand and also be used by a future Democratic regime. Consistent free speech advocates are few and far between with most marching lock and step toward the Israel-First Technopticon. 

  

No doubt many swept up are themselves tyrants who championed cancel culture against people who ran afoul of Woke purity tests or didn’t bend the knee to Rona dictates. These are the ones receiving manufactured sympathy of the "resistance" dialectic, reflective of the circulation of (presumed) "elites" and the sympathy they hold for their fellow privileged hypocrites who were tyrants at the height of 2020. Yet many others are normal working-class people expressing an opinion not even necessarily "celebrating" Kirk's death (which would still be free speech). Attorney General Pam Bondi is finding energy she lacks about the Epstein files and real-world corruption (she was a corrupt lobbyist herself), to go after Office Depot employees for not showing sufficient loyalty to the White House line – just as occurred when people were fired and persecuted for failing Woke purity tests under the previous regime. The real problem is the precedence it establishes with far-reaching consequences for all. Once the authority is given, then it only expands and is built upon by every succeeding regime.

Let’s be clear: “Celebrating” his death is as much bad taste as those who have celebrated other deaths of people they simply disagree with. And this should include warmongering rhetoric common among elected officials from both Parties, where cucks of AIPAC and the War Machine profiteers suddenly find their “courage” praising slaughter of The Nameless. Aside from Gaza, we can also cite the bombastic gloating Vance - whose much-touted Marine service was as a noncombat public relations officer - made about the bombing of a Venezuelan fishing vessel, a desperate act to distract from the Epstein coverup and Trump's failure to deliver on his economic promises (using the false Venezuelan government “drug cartel” narrative as his version of Bush's “terrorist” bogeyman). The “domestic terrorist” bogeyman is being raised and is as much false as when many Leftists fearmonger about the “far-right”. As always, the problem is the unequal application of “the law” and State institutions to whatever organized thugs can serve the social purposes of the billionaire donor class at any given time, whether that be Antifa or Betar authoritarians etc..

Distracting from its other failures and betrayals (to those who supported them and believed their promises), the White House has seized upon Kirk’s assassination to push through the same kind of “hate speech” egregore earlier fed by the Liberal establishment. This has been their unified message, from the cunning psychopath Stephen Miller, to the bumbling incompetent Pam Bondi, to resident Thiel sugar-baby J.D. Vance, up to their boss Trump who reiterated their calls and even suggested the crackdown include anyone giving him "bad publicity". As with the Epstein files, the buck ultimately stops with Trump himself and his sycophants should not be scapegoated for his own coverups.

Any crackdown has nothing to do with people celebrating Kirk's death, but as with any other is designed to expand the powers of the State, combined this time with its Technocratic order and will also be used (naturally) to suppress even more dissent of the special, privileged foreign nation. So for example the faithful Israel-cuck Ted Cruz, who admitted his primary reason for becoming a Senator is “to be the leading defender of Israel,” introduced a bill to shut down pro-Palestine groups. Even though the White House’s own narrative makes absolutely no connection between that issue and the alleged assassin, FBI Director Kash Patel backed the bill which isn’t surprising for someone who pledged to “prioritize Israel”. Its even more disgusting they are doing all this in the name of someone whose own words criticized such legislation: “Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free.” 

Jewish scholars such as the physicist Hajo Meyer, who
was vocally anti-Zionist, calling out weaponization
of the "anti-Semite" slogan by organized Jewish
political pressure groups funded by billionaires. 

Kirk's Personal Growth and the “Anti-Semite” Libel

None of my analysis of the rise of Woke (and its outrage antithesis) and the Zionist donors behind TPUSA is to suggest Kirk held anything but authentic convictions. These were shaped by his specific brand of Protestant Christianity, where blind support of Israel was taken for granted and viewed as a religious obligation. Kirk developed such an affinity towards them that he kept a “Jewish sabbath”, with common repetitions of “Judeo-Christian civilization”. He repeated (at least until very recently, as we will see) Zionist hasbara as factual without any critical thought: Denying the Israeli policy of deliberately targeting civilians and engineering famine in Gaza, even denying the very existence of Palestine in his debates. In one clip, he even joked about Gaza “no longer having tall buildings” for gays to be thrown off.(4) He shouted down a question about the USS Liberty, slandering the consensus of its survivors as “conspiracy theory”. So Kirk clearly had his own biases and blind spots regarding Israel.

Yet Kirk seemed to be noticing and speaking more freely about Israel this past year. According to his close friend Candace Owens, he seemed to be on the verge of converting to the Catholic Church. This has been corroborated by another Catholic source. As I know from my own Catholic background, this is significant because it would’ve meant he abandoned the Christian Zionist worldview, diametrically opposed to the very foundations of Catholic theology. (Which isn’t to deny Zionist infiltration of Catholicism, such as the billionaire-funded Philos Project, etc.). And even at the height of his pro-Israel dogma, Kirk was generally a defender of free speech, opposing efforts to criminalize free speech against Israel. Merely welcoming free debate on this one issue was enough to earn him the ire of Israel-First donors. And as they so often do, they overplay their hands so much it forced Kirk to look even deeper into these matters despite what the donors pressured.

The first signs appeared after 7th Oct. 2023, which Kirk viewed according to the Israeli narrative  while expressing skepticism about the official story of those events, implying it was carried out with the knowledge of certain people within the Israeli State; although later in that same interview he implied it was Israeli leftists undermining Netanyahu. Nevertheless, the first cracks appeared and those only grew until they reached a crescendo within the last few months before his assassination. In Nov. 2023, Elon Musk was accused of “anti-Semitism” by some for allowing tweets that simply pointed out the disproportionate number of Jewish individuals behind unfettered mass immigration and other liberal causes. It was a contrived “controversy” – in which Netanyahu and others defended Musk, who has extensive Israeli business connections I documented throughout my blog – to craft the parameters of “acceptable” discourse. It was enough for Musk to be cowered into the humiliation ritual to Auschwitz, closely flanked and monitored by his handlers, Ben Shapiro and the Chabad Rabbi Menachem Margolin.

With the caveat it obviously wasn’t “all Jews,” Kirk agreed that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was involved in many liberal causes.(5) “They've come after this program for calling us antisemites,” Kirk said on his show on 16 Nov. 2023. “It cheapens the label of antisemitism. It is not good for anybody.” Indeed, without even seeing the irony, this statement led several individuals to level exactly that libel against him. Conservative blogger and radio host Erick Erickson called TPUSA “not just a grifting operation, but an anti-Semitic grifting operation.” The Federalist co-founder Ben Domenech wrote: “If Charlie Kirk remains the head of TPUSA, the right has an anti-Semite problem that will follow them into the coming elections.”

Kirk’s influence was such that the New York Times described his “journey from pariah to headliner” with his RNC speech in July 2024. His support for Trump was influential in swaying many younger voters for Trump. One of the factors behind the election was backlash over Gaza, tipping balance in some key states due to the need for some accountability for Harris and Biden (while it was always clear Trump was lying about opposing foreign wars and would continue to MIGA). Kirk could clearly read the changing political landscape and shift accordingly, even if by small measures. Sources close to Kirk separately told InfoWars host Harrison H. Smith and The Grayzone journalist Max Blumenthal that he raised the fear that Israel would assassinate him if he turned against the pro-Israel dogma even one bit. Indeed, in recent months Kirk began to question exactly that on many occasions. As noted by Blumenthal in his well-documented article:

“Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

“In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a ‘bully,’ the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.”

Kirk criticized Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill"

He initially opposed war with Iran, although once
Trump bombed he fell in line and praised him

In May 2025, New York Republican Congressman Mike Lawler sponsored H.R. 867, a bill that would have criminalized dissent and boycotts of Israel in more draconian levels than ever seen. I exposed Lawler and this hateful bill in an article from the time. Fortunately, it received enough pushback that it was defeated – although they clearly won’t and haven’t stopped their efforts. And one of those who vocally criticized that bill and its promoters was none other than Charlie Kirk, who wrote on 4th May:

“Tomorrow the House will vote on HR 867, a bill that will criminalize private boycotts of Israel. Fines up to $1,000,000 and prison time up to 20 years. Bills like this only create more antisemitism, and play into growing narratives that Israel is running the US government. In America you are allowed to hold differing views. You are allowed to disagree and protest. We've allowed far too many people who hate America move here from abroad, but the right to speak freely is the birthright of all Americans. This bill should not pass. Any Republican that votes for this bill will expose themselves. We will be watching very closely.”

As if to fit the caricature of exactly what Kirk was speaking about, the loudmouth Zionist Mark Levin screeched: “You don’t know what you’re talking about, Charlie. The bill merely extends the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018 signed by President Trump to international organizations. What 'causes' antisemitism is antisemites. Bigots. Jew-haters. They don't need excuses as you state here. Your post is absurd.” Yet he too has grabbed onto the coattails and memorialized Kirk’s free debate cause, without the least bit of cognitive dissonance regarding his own support for suppressing boycotts of his precious Israel.

A similar reaction came from Gazelle Sharmahd, daughter of the late Iranian opposition activist Jamshid Sharmahd and a vocal opposition figure in her own right. “Charlie Kirk is misleading 4 million people — again,” she wrote at the time. Like many others, she has made a Faustian bargain with Zionists, whose own evoking of “Persia” in their war indicates it has far more to do with a strong, independent nation as part of fulfilling Biblical “prophecy,” than just a specific regime allegedly sponsoring “terrorists” or building a “nuclear weapon” when Israel already has their own nuclear weapons facility in Dimona. Indeed, Gazelle Sharmahd has also promoted pro-Israel propaganda and exploited Kirk’s assassination by trying to link it to the Israeli embassy staffers killed in May.

Despite his own pro-Israel views, Kirk nevertheless opposed U.S. involvement in their war against Iran (whose regime he had no sympathy towards). “Iran is an evil regime,” he wrote in Jan. 2020 after Trump’s assassination of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. “Critical we remain restrained and disciplined against another endless, reckless war in the region. NO WAR with Iran!” When the war-drums beat again this summer, Kirk wrote a lengthy post warning against “regime change wars” and seemed to have a good historic understanding of Iran and how the regime resulted from blowback after the CIA engineered the overthrow of Mossadegh in 1953. Yet once Trump bombed the alleged nuclear facilities, he fell in line (like many other statists who still support a president’s action no matter their own anti-war misgivings) and claimed Trump had “no choice.” Nevertheless, Kirk apparently lobbied Trump against war in a private meeting, according to Tucker Carlson. “He went to the Oval Office and said, ‘Sir, I totally understand and think Iran’s really bad. But a war with Iran is something that could really hurt our country.’” Carlson added how Kirk showed him “intense” and “massive abuse” he received from his pro-Israel donors, making a number of “real enemies” in the process. These only intensified after he platformed Israel-sceptic voices at the TPUSA conference the next month (as will be discussed in Part 2). 

Billionaire corporate welfare queens the Ellisons
are being given unprecedented control over US 
media, to manufacture consent for Greater Israel

Billionaire Media Consolidation Escalates

Having already lost most of the American Left over Israel, now the Zionists are facing growing discontent on the American Right too, with influential voices openly expressing the incompatibility of “America-First” rhetoric with the Israel-First reality. So the Israeli State and its subversive billionaire class within the US have become increasingly desperate to shore up continued support at any cost – even if it means acting in more blatant ways than past subtlety. The last few months reveal a pattern of billionaire-funded, State-organized astroturfed coteries to stem the grassroots swelling of discontent against Israel's undue control and their genocide in Gaza with our stolen labor and resources. They are aware of the potential threat to their power with these big voices turning against them, if not at the political level (where their stranglehold remains) then certainly downstream where it truly matters: Culture.

In April 2025, Netanyahu met with a group of podcasters at the Blair House in Washington, D.C. “Among those in attendance were podcasters including Dave Rubin, Tim Pool and former White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, writers Bethany Mandel and David J. Harris Jr., influencer Jessica Kraus, Commentary senior editor Seth Mandel and Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway. Pool expressed concerns about increased antisemitism and anti-Zionism in the pro-Trump podcasting space, according to sources in the room. Pool famously had Kanye West on his podcast, and the rapper walked out mid-interview after Pool pushed back against antisemitic comments. Responding to Pool, Netanyahu said that is the reason he invited the group to meet with him.” So this official residence, owned by the federal government and subsidized by taxpayer money, was placed at the disposal of a foreign nation’s propaganda efforts by an alleged “MAGA” administration.

In July 2025, the Israeli Foreign Ministry funded an Israel tour for sixteen American conservative/MAGA influencers under 30. It was being operated through a nonprofit called Israel365, whose propaganda outreach to Christian Zionists and Noahides I exposed in May. There has been unprecedented pushback I’ve never seen within my lifetime, and this came to a head with the fallout from low-IQ podcast Nelk Boys’ scripted interview with Netanyahu on 21^st July. This too was held at the Blair House overseen by a Trump White House that wants to Make Israel Great (Again) with our taxpayer money propping up this albatross upon America.

On 24 July, the Federal Communications Commission approved the merger of Skydance with Paramount, the parent company of CBS. Skydance is owned by David Ellison, son of Zionist billionaire Larry Ellison of Oracle technocracy and mRNA jab infamy. “The day before the FCC approved Skydance-Paramount, the president hosted a kickoff event at the White House for his AI Action Plan, a new federal framework for tech regulation (or lack thereof),” as noted by tech and business writer Nitish Pahwa. “Much of the plan reads like a Christmas gift list for Larry Ellison and Oracle in particular, including overriding environmental protections to construct those Stargate-style A.I. data-center campuses, prioritizing contracts with 'free speech'-focused A.I. firms like Elon Musk's xAI (in which Ellison and Oracle are both invested), integrating A.I. infrastructure into the Pentagon, and centralizing the government's massive data sets (a special focus of Oracle's).” Ellison is the largest private funder of the Israeli military.

David Ellison coordinated with Israeli military leaders on a “Counter-BDS” initiative going back to 2015. Indeed within days of the merger, he suppressed BDS efforts by thousands of Hollywood professionals. They hide behind being “private” companies that can determine their own free speech policies, but as with other Big Tech firms the truth is they rely on federal funds via the public-private partnership. In the past those same platforms promoted censorship around Jab mandates and Woke – now they are doing the exact same regarding Israel. Throwing even the semblance of free markets down the Orwellian memory hole, the White House corporatists are maneuvering Larry Ellison as the Big Brother controlling TikTok (at least in the US) in a deal that *just happens* to be finalizing days after the Kirk assassination. He promptly installed Israeli army instructor Erica Mandel as TikTok’s “Global Head of Hate Speech Policy.” And its no coincidence that pro-Israel billionaires are primary beneficiaries from this merger of Crony Capitalism with Corporate Socialism.

Thinkpol Commissariat Bari Weiss speaking at the
Jewish Federations of North America's General Assembly:
"We bend the arc of history; it doesn't bend on its own."
Building "the new world." "Anti-Zionism is antisemitism."

For the new position of CBS Thinkpol Commissariat, the oligarchs installed Free Press editor Bari Weiss. Her entire career proves she was being groomed as a leading Zionist propagandist, with a long rap sheet of media training in Israel and various internships in programs funded by Adelson money. Aside from the Zionist element, Technocrats like Marc Andreessen and David O. Sacks were among the financiers of Weiss’ phantom multi-million-dollar “news” outlet. These connections aren’t surprising since her father, Lou Weiss, is an associate of MEGA Group founder Les Wexner and member of the AIPAC National Council(6) who evoked the genocidal “Amalek” trope – which by its very nature incites murder (1 Samuel 15:3) - and promoted the 2020 lockdowns, even proposing “Fauci for President”.

Running cover for its own Zionist dialectic, Liberal media focused on the legacy media (even making a scapegoat of the Rona tyrant pos millionaire Kimmel to deflect from the working-class people being canceled) but the real implication is Ellison and Weiss ensuring hasbara continues to sway American culture – legacy “news” like CBS is already irrelevant, it’s the programming that influences the culture. Just two days before Kirk’s assassination, these oligarchs anointed neocon Hudson Institute President and CEO Kenneth Weinstein as CBS News Ombudsman, to openly edit all content to ensure compliance with Israel. The new Woke regime replaced the old Woke regime at CBS.(7)

Its no coincidence all these events happened in July 2025, or the quickness at which Ben Shapiro (who had publicly criticized Kirk just days before for platforming a “clown tent” of Israel-critics) exploited the assassination: On the very day, before any investigation, writing a screed for Free Press; quickly vowed to “pick up his blood-stained microphone”; and did a publicity stunt of donating $1 million (even while Daily Wire is bankrupt – whose funding him?) in what clearly looks like a humiliation ritual to keep the three hostages in line to Zionist dogma. This is part of the continued consolidation of media (already controlled by a handful of Corporations) by an even-smaller cabal of Israel-First billionaire oligarchs, and staffed by reliable stooges who would be confined to other tasks befitting their mediocrity if not for the undue and unnatural authority of billionaire donors in our society.  

Behind them all were State institutions and involvement of the very same conclave of billionaires. Without even any direct evidence its clear these events are related and had some kind of coordination. The symbolic clash over America's soul came to a head around the same time as anti-Zionist voices were platformed at the Turning Point USA Summit and with recorded panel discussions with him openly debating the power of AIPAC and an Israel-First foreign policy with TP students. Kirk was responding to growing discontent with Israel that could no longer be ignored, yet that alone led to vile, vitriolic hatred from many of the same Zionist propagandists now exploiting his death for their own purposes. That is, to justify the expansion of thoughtcrime domestically and to entrench subservience with Israel. …. To be continued in Part 2. 

Then Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon speaking to
Shimon Peres on Kol Yisrael Radio, 3 Oct. 2001.
Substantiated by many newspapers and media from the time. 

Notes:

(1) A compelling case has been made of the Corporate and Deep State roots behind Woke by scholars as varied politically as the leftist Christian Parenti and libertarian Michael Rectenwald. David North's critique of the Frankfurt School from a Marxist perspective also convinced me to go beyond calling it "Cultural Marxism" as I used to. This is even while I remain steadfastly opposed to the statism, authoritarianism, materialist analysis, and historic legacy of Communism. Woke is a bastard child from certain Marxists going back to the Frankfurt School who split from the economic focus of orthodox Marxists. Yet the trajectory was there too, as the works of Anthony Sutton, G. Edward Griffin, and other conspiracy scholars conclusively prove the nexus of International Finance and Communist revolutions. 

(2)   I witnessed this myself as a Ron Paul libertarian who was also loosely active in activism with the state branch of Occupy. Most were leftists but we could work together around the same specific cause: Confronting the State/Banking nexus that affected all of us. But then I saw their protests increasingly went down culture war misdirections. Around the same time I noticed rhetoric about “white supremacy” increasing online, with people repeating the exact same slogans and analysis – another example of top-down social engineering created by privileged academics and funded by shadowy think-tanks. So it is that such people who thought they were “fighting the system” are partly responsible for entrenching that very system because they failed to diagnose it correctly. They were useful idiots manipulated to divide and sow dissension among working- and middle- class people.

(3) Although their conclusions are at odds with mine on a foundational level. They separate Zionism from its messianic religious roots, ignoring that it was a specific rejection away from Europe, and oppose it only as they twist it into their own vision of “white supremacy.” Such people are the opposite dialectic as the pro-Zionist American and European right-wing that identifies Israel as part of “Western civilization.” In their own ways, both these dialectics entrench the very same system and enable many of the same policies they claim to oppose. 

(4) The context is the high rate of gays and trans among many leftist activist groups for Palestine. While its true these Western leftists champion lifestyles at odds with the dominant values of most Palestinians and opposed by Islam, those who point this out are also hypocrites who would be viewed as gullible "goyim" and spat upon by many of the same Zionist fanatics they idolize, due to their Christianity. 

(5) While advocating for its own version of Jewish identity politics, including CEO Jonathan Greenblatt’s decrying Jewish intermarriage, the ADL has advocated mass immigration and open borders for the USA but an exclusivist Jewish ethno-state for Israel. Greenblatt has championed censorship and criminalizing pro-Palestine protests. At the same time, the ADL started an “exchange program” between US police forces and Israel in 2002, as part of the militarization of police playing its role in suppressing dissent and building the Technopticon, now using immigration as an excuse. And let us never forget the origins of the ADL: Founded in 1913 to defend the criminal *pdf* Leo Frank and pressure the State of Georgia to deny his victim justice, solely because of who he was.

(6) Lou Weiss has consistently boasted of AIPAC’s control even while decrying the ‘antisemitism’ behind those who point out that reality as negative. He wrote in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal in 2019: “Anti-Semites on the hard right and the hard left love to decry the power of the ‘Jewish lobby.’ In one sense they’re right. Israel does exert a profound pull on the American soul. The two nations share deep commonalities, interests and profound respect. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or Aipac, gains its strength not only from Jewish support, but also from the scores of millions of gentile Americans who cherish these bonds.” Notice how he capitalizes “Jewish” while keeping “gentile” lower-case – just one example of the Judeo-supremacism at the heart of Zionism.

(7) Symbolized by the “scapegoat” Stephen Colbert, the mindless partisan hack loser who was a shameless stooge for Statism and warfare so long as it was led by anyone other than Trump. Colbert was especially arrogant and sanctimonious with the 2020 Tyranny, advocating lockdowns, masks upon masks, and the endless supply of jabs and boosters. His shameless attitude in advocating an apartheid state placed upon those of us who remain unvaccinated, epitomizes the hypocrisy of Liberal “resistance” to Trump who were all for the infringement upon free speech and erosion of liberties so long as it was their savior at the helm.