Analysis of the Christchurch Attacks: Reactions and Geopolitics (Part 2)

by Sean Jobst
25 April 2019

@7:00 - "It is now second to the United States. That tall tower there is the United States. The United States is bigger than Israel. But it ain't that much bigger than Israel! And Israel is number two. Israel is 1/10th of 1% of the world's population and we are receiving 20% of the global share in private cyber security investments. That's 200 times our weight in the world. What this revolution is doing - big data, AI, and connectivity - is allowing small countries to be big countries."

@9:51 - "Our NSA which is called Unit 8200. It's pretty big. How big do you think it is? Hmm? Well, I'll give you a hint, okay. America, the United States, is about 42 times the size of Israel in terms of population. So how much bigger do you think the American NSA is relative to the Israeli NSA? No brave people among you? 42 times, 40 times? Nah, come on, stop. Its not five times, but its not ten times bigger. It's not even ten times bigger. You know the Five Eyes? Israel is the sixth Eye? No, Israel is the second Eye!"

Netanyahu has his sights on the Five Eyes

At the end of this January, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the Cybertech 2019 conference in Tel Aviv, in which he made several revealing statements. Reiterating his recurrent boasts about the growth of Israel among global cyber-security and tech firms, and with the United States led by what's continuously revealed to be the most "Make Israel Great Again" President, an ungrateful Netanyahu made boasts clearly setting up Israel as a competitor seeking to replace the power of its foremost "ally".

What most concerns us here are his boasts about Israel, through the power of its Unit 8200, being the "second Eye" and in the process, implying that Israel will displace Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the UK in this global intelligence-sharing community. Both its timing only a month-and-a-half before the Christchurch attacks, and the Internet censorship efforts following those attacks, should lead us to wonder if there is a connection? Especially in what I discussed previously about a push to move New Zealand out of the full confidence of the Five Eyes given questions about the vulnerability of their intelligence services. We can further make connections with earlier comments by Netanyahu.

"Declaration of War"

On 23 December 2016, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 2334, which was co-sponsored by New Zealand. It condemned the building of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Despite the fact that many previous resolutions had condemned the settlements and were never enforced, even if the UN had the means to do so never mind the will, Netanyahu took an especially harsh reaction against New Zealand, issuing what he termed a "declaration of war", and recalling the Israeli ambassador. The Foreign Minister's office was vandalized with the words "Traitor Jew Hater McCully". Diplomatic relations were only restored six months later. This followed Israel's warning to New Zealand not to draft a UN resolution supporting peace talks in 2015.


When an earthquake struck Christchurch in 2011, a Mossad ring was accidentally uncovered when five passports were found on the corpse of an Israeli who had died in that earthquake, and three of his colleagues had promptly flew back to Israel. The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service was suspicious that Netanyahu had phoned Prime Minister John Key no less than four times that day; how both the Australia-based Israeli Ambassador and the Israeli Defense Minister rushed to Christchurch; and an Israeli forensics team wandered into the sealed-off "red zone" and were given access to the police national database. We can thus add a concrete Israeli dimension to the "juicier target" threat.

Mossad activities in the region

Ex-Mossad whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky has revealed that Mossad operates a "passport factory" that churns out stolen Australian and New Zealand passports for many of their operations, most notably in the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai on 19 January 2010. He revealed that passports from those two countries are favored by Mossad due to their geographic isolation and thus their accents not as well-known in many areas of the world. The New Zealand government imposed diplomatic sanctions on Israel after two Mossad agents, Eli Cara and Uriel Kelman, were convicted of passport fraud in Auckland in 2004.

A security official revealed that the two were linked with a fugitive Mossad agent named Zev Barkan, connected to an "Israeli terrorist cell operating out of Thailand": "He goes to Laos, Cambodia, Burma and Thailand and deals with gangs that he pays to kill tourists steal their identity papers, passports, most just disappear or their deaths have been reported as accidents, drownings and such. They like to throw their victims off the side of tour boats. Barkan is mostly interested in passports and identity documents, there have been a number of Australians killed for their passports."

There is a peculiar link to the international Chabad movement, which operates branches throughout the region despite the small population of Jews. While providing a spiritual cover, such as presiding over "Noahide" cults in the Philippines, their activities in Thailand raise the question if their activities could also be used as cover by the Mossad. In August 2017, the Thai Army found smuggled weapons in a raid at the Chabad House and an Israeli's Search and Rescue Clinic. The Chabad House in Bangkok is "a backpacker haven packed with young Israeli travelers", which should make us wonder if any of those "backpackers" are Mossad agents. For that matter, what was Brenton Tarrant doing in Israel for the nine days he spent there in 2016?   

A selection of Tarrant's manifesto; pictures of
the Freemason and "Templar" Anders Breivik

Tarrant, Breivik, and the Reconstituted "Knights Templar"?

In his manifesto, Tarrant went out of his way to disclaim any connection to "any organization or group, though I have donated to many nationalist groups and have interacted with many more," almost like doing the latter was to provide the excuse for censorship as I described in Part 1. He alluded to a "reborn Knights Templar" which allegedly gave him "a blessing in support of the attack". This is the same "group" that Anders Breivik, the Norwegian who killed 77 in a bombing and mass shooting in 2011, claimed to belong. As we read in the above selection, Tarrant cited Breivik as his role model and primary inspiration.

Whereas Tarrant's 77-page manifesto was sloppier and full of grammatical errors, Breivik's 1500-page manifesto which he termed "2083: A European Declaration of Independence", was more complex and sophisticated, purporting to be an academic work for the shadowy group. Indeed, its cover displayed a Templar cross on the cover and the tagline "Christi Templique Solomonici", which aside from Templar connotations also alludes to efforts to rebuild the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, a favored cause of many Chabadist-Zionist groups and whose symbolism has long been employed by Freemasons; until his post-attack expulsion from the order, Breivik was a member of the Lodge of St. Olaf at the Three Columns in Oslo.

Giving himself the rank "Justiciar Knight", Breivik claimed that he refounded the Knights Templar around with eight others in London in 2002, as an "international Christian military order" and "anti-Jihad crusader-organization". The Knights Templar are the notorious subject of acceptable scope of "conspiracies" pushed by the mainstream, but even mainstream media admits there is no link to this modern group or the medieval group of knights. Rather, it seems to be a brand adopted to invest a sense of occultic mystique around some figure or event, adopted even by a group that splintered from the La Familia drug cartel in the Mexican state of Michoacan. In the case of Breivik and Tarrant, it was clearly adopted as imagery of a Clash of Civilizations.

Anders Breivik, Crusader for Israel

As part of their own effort to push this dialectical Clash of Civilizations, the elites and their media have portrayed Breivik as a "Nazi". Knowing that the public is not prone to appreciate nuances, they portray the gestures he has made in the courtroom as the infamous "Nazi salute". Aside from the fact that the Roman salute long predated anything associated with Hitler, and indeed has its original roots as a votive offering by ancient Iberians (thus the original name Salutatio Iberica), Breivik's clenched fist salute seems to be a copy of the radical Zionist Kahanists, Jewish Defense League (JDL), and Kach movement than anything native European.

Breivik made his reality clear in his manifesto, that he is a crusader for the cause of Israel: "So let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers against all anti-Zionists" (page 1166). His manifesto was filled with praise of Israel and Zionism and the standard denunciations of "anti-Semitism" in a way that fits the Zionist narrative: "If one acknowledges that Islam has always oppressed the Jews, one accepts that Israel was a necessary refuge for the Jews fleeing not only the European, but also the Islamic variety of anti-Judaism."

Those last words are especially significant, since they seemed to have bought into the Zionist narrative that European heritage and culture was also intrinsically "anti-Semitic" and so going along with the Zionist agenda is a sort of obligation to shed our "guilt". He expressed his belief in the holocaust: "I don't find the anti-holocaust evidence credible so I don't see a reason why anyone should deny the Jewish holocaust" (page 1366), a simplistic dismissal of revisionist scholarship. All of these and more lead me to agree with the Norwegian sociologist Johan Galtung, that Breivik had Mossad links. At the very least, we can see who clearly benefits from both Breivik and Tarrant.

Analysis of the Christchurch Attacks: Reactions and Geopolitics (Part 1)

by Sean Jobst
19 April 2019

Over a month has passed since the shootings at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, and lost in the broader debate are its suspicious consequences and their deeper geopolitical implications. Domestically, the New Zealand government has used it as their casus belli for gun control and to increase their selling the country's assets to foreign corporations and control by their own Globalist clubs. Geopolitically, we can ignore neither the Israeli connections nor the shooter's manifesto which reveals the imprint of Duginism. All of these aspects tie in together as I will demonstrate.

The false flag question

A false flag should not be confused with those co-opted elements who talk of "crisis actors" and events being "fake" (to discredit all false flags), nor should it be a knee-jerk reaction to every single event with no commitment to seeing the evidence play out. Rather, a false flag simply means there are suspicious questions about a violent event that points to deeper involvement than the official narrative suggests. In this case, that there is more to it than just a lone-wolf shooter named Brenton Tarrant.

One recurring theme is that information initially released after an event is quietly withdrawn, never to be spoken of again. It happened on 9/11 with the five cheering Israelis of Urban Moving Systems filming the attacks. As anyone who followed the early coverage of the Christchurch can attest, initial reports said that there were multiple shooters and official reports even said there were others "on the run". These claims were never backtracked, but simply disappeared down the Memory Hole. What happened to these "multiple shooters"?

The backdoor for gun control

Barely had the dust settled or the blood dried than the New Zealand government under Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern pushed through with wide-sweeping gun control legislation - 600 pages (!) - which we are to believe was a spontaneous reaction to a traumatic attack and not something pre-planned, just waiting for the perfect opportunity to be released. Just as the various leading Zionist-Neocons in my own country called for a "cataclysmic event" on the eve of 9/11, why were these two attacks which exceeded the entire annual murder rate in all New Zealand, allowed to affect such permanent changes?

Especially since Tarrant himself, in the 74-page Manifesto he wrote entitled "The Great Replacement: Towards a New Society", predictably saw gun control as the first result toward this "new society": "Finally, to create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states [sic]. This conflict over the 2nd amendment [sic] and the attempted removal of firearms rights will ultimately result in a civil war that will eventually balkanize the US along political, cultural and, most importantly, racial lines." So, you react to the attacks in the exact way the shooter envisioned and sought?

How was an Australian citizen able to so easily secure assault weapons in New Zealand? Why were New Zealand citizens to bear the brunt of a foreigner's actions? Based on what various ANZAC speakers have noted about the gun situation in their countries, there were already strict rules within New Zealand against possessing handguns and semi-automatic weapons, and strict government regulations of weapons. We are confronted with the same parallel as EU intelligence agencies "monitoring" various Islamist shooters who nevertheless manage to move and procure weapons more freely than the actual natives.

These speakers also suggest the easiest ways to obtain weapons are through certain "clubs" with deep links to well-connected Masonic circles. Keep this in mind as we see the alleged Masonic connections of Tarrant and the role of the Labour government in privatizing ports, the only entry for such weapons into the island country. We are confronted once again with elites who use real loss of lives for their own purposes, while playing out the very scripted response cited by the manifesto.

What was John Podesta doing in New Zealand?

Increasingly in a Globalized world, events in one corner of the world can affect those in another. This includes reviving the talking points of our own domestic advocates for gun control, and we have to point out the suspicious activities of one: John Podesta, former campaign manager for the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016. In other words, the anointed talking head for the left pole of the Left/Right dialectic just happened to be in New Zealand around the time of the attacks, lending his support to his NZ counterparts and in the process dropping clues to the deeper implications of these attacks.

Podesta was a keynote speaker for "A Global Progressives Event" in Australia on 7th March, and we know that sometime afterwards he traveled to New Zealand where he praised Ardern as a "superstar" and "somebody that people are paying attention to". Asked to comment on the warning by New Zealand's top spies to Parliament the month earlier that their elections were extremely vulnerable from cyber attacks, Podesta agreed that NZ was a "juicier target" than the other members of the "Five Eyes" intelligence community (US, Canada, UK, Australia) and warned about "the use of social media to spread discord, lies, dissastisfaction". He added: "There are other actors in the region including China that may have a high degree of interest in being able to penetrate what the private conversations of people in NZ politics and NZ Government are looking at."

Globalist connections of Ardern and NZ Labour

What anointed Ardern as such a "superstar" but her Globalist connections? This gave her a ready platform before the global Zionist-Corporatist media, which indeed made a heroine out of Ardern. We should cut through the emotion-driven sound-bytes to look at the track record of Ardern and her Labour Party predecessors, who on more than one level pursued actions that fostered the attacks via the Problem - Reaction - Solution dialectic. That is, they laid the groundwork for the socio-political factors leading to the attack; through their censorship and media, engineering the reaction; and then proposing the "solutions".

The reality is that Ardern government and the entire NZ Labour apparatus is stocked full of politicians with memberships in various Globalist clubs like the Parliamentarians for Global Action, who decide policies beyond the prying eyes of their citizens. That they have overseen increased military expenditures and involved New Zealand in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and vocally supporting airstrikes against Syria, while promoting mass-immigration into her own country.

Like her predecessors, Ardern has pursued Neoliberal policies literally selling out the country to foreign corporations, especially from the US and China. And most significantly in light of Christchurch, privatized and deregulated the literal ports of entry for guns into the island country. The global media anointing her as a "superstar" through this horrific event - including a gushing interview already a full year earlier, and talks of her creating an internationalist "progressive foreign policy" - is a dress rehearsal for her desired career with the United Nations after she leaves office, much like her mentor and predecessor Helen Clark and like politicians worldwide use their political careers as resume builders for their ultimate careers in banking, lobbying, the UN, or Globalist NGOs.

Insanity of the multicultural dialectic

As I am increasingly seeing and have pointed out in past articles, I see the same elites that are pushing for wars abroad and creating the socio-economic conditions driving emigration from mostly-Muslim countries, also pushing for open borders and unfettered immigration to mostly-White and Western countries, including the psycho-social conditions for declining birthrates in our countries. All the same, they are able to shed crocodile tears when Muslims are the "victims" of the new "white nationalist" bogeyman, while simultaneously killing or looting Muslims in their own countries.

Tarrant the alleged "white ethno-nationalist", mentioned absolutely nothing about the role of Zionist-Jewish organizations and prominent figures in promoting mass-immigration, just like the various controlled opposition voices that condemn open borders only when it comes to Muslim immigrants while still championing Israel and ignoring the Zionist inspiration behind the Kalergi Plan. The same can be said for Renaud Camus, the Frenchman who coined the "great replacement" phrase used by Tarrant in his own manifesto, and exhibits pro-Israeli sympathies. These represent nothing but a false "opposition" who enable the very policies they oppose, because of their buying into the Zionist dialectic that Israel represents "Western values" and lobbying for fighting wars on Israel's behalf.



Co-opting the discourse: Camus and his Zionist friend Finkielkraut

Much the same can be said for the other side of the dialectic, who champion open borders for their own tribal-religious interests, oblivious to the fact that its pushed by the very same elites attacking their countries. They cheer on the publicity stunt of a hijab-wearing, mosque-visiting, salam-uttering Ardern, catering to the victimhood mentality at a mosque where two members had previously been radicalized and killed in drone attacks championed by her government. This trend dismisses every Islamist attack as a false flag and, even while pointing out Israeli connections, buys into the official narrative of "white nationalists". An example is Mint Press News, which even manages to slip in a swipe at Ukraine, being just one of many countries visited by Tarrant, to fit their editorial line which pretends to be "anti-Zionist" while ignoring the deep Zionist-Chabad connections of Putin or Israeli ties to the Kremlin-backed separatists I documented last year.

Tarrant, the "Ethno-Nationalist" Psyop

The elites have used this attack to demonize those in Western countries who oppose open borders and mass-immigration. We have to wonder why Tarrant's social media accounts were shut down within moments, except that they wanted to control the narrative. Or his employing of various memes, the fact that his sending a donation to the anti-immigrant Identitarian movement was used to discredit that movement and refuse its leader entry into the US - like receiving a donation from somebody indicates alleged support for their later actions, which I say despite my own problems with Identitarian leaders never saying anything about the central Jewish-Zionist role or their idolizing of that anti-Western Kabbalist chaos subversive Alexander Dugin.

ADL and HIAS: Advocates of Open Borders for "Goyim",
but an exclusively Jewish ethno-state for Israel

As with gun control, they have used Christchurch to censor and suppress free speech, a slippery slope that has included prosecuting people who merely shared the shooter's video (even while the media itself showed it), anyone expressing a view outside their own tightly-controlled narrative. A leading actor in this effort has been the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), whose leader Jonathan Greenblatt has opened a "command center" in Silicon Valley to "combat cyberhate" and hired a "technology director", thus pressuring tech companies to censor all opinions this subversive Zionist pressure organization deems as "hate".

Almost like a gift to Marxist talking-points which like to condemn all their opponents as "Nazi" or "Fascist", Tarrant described himself as an "eco-fascist". We can take this as yet another indicator of his "manifesto" appearing like a sloppily-constructed meme, but there is something deeper here in how he wrote of his desire not to father any children since they are "ultimately destructive to nature and culture". What "ethno-nationalist" would see the bequething of culture and heritage to successive generations as "destructive"? I find this very peculiar, since its exactly the declining birthrates in the West that are used by the elites to justify open borders.

Peculiar also is how this "ethno-nationalist" idolizes Communist China: "The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People's Republic of China." This is very suspicious given China's technology links with Israel; how Podesta specifically named China as "penetrating" New Zealand politics and intelligence; and how China has been increasing its influence in the country so much that Western countries have ceased sharing information with the New Zealand intelligence agencies for fear it could get into Chinese hands....which brings me to suspicous remarks  Netanyahu made about the "Five Eyes" recently at Cybertech Tel Aviv 2019....

To be continued in Part 2....

Fanatic Israeli rabbis celebrate burning of Notre Dame as Talmudic vengeance

by Sean Jobst
18 April 2019

While the world was watching the historic Notre Dame cathedral in Paris burning in real time, some of the reactions from Israel amounted to celebration. Purveyors of a Haredi Jewish website and a leading rabbi of the Religious Zionist movement cited Jewish scriptures to justify gloating over this tragedy, citing both divine vengeance and laws against "idolatry".

Under the headline "Paris: Notre-Dame church which serves as a house of idol worship, goes up in flames," the Haredi website JDN on Monday night (15th April) greeted the burning as a divine retribution, citing a phrase from the Jewish liturgy "and evil in its entirety will go up like smoke", since "The fire that is raging in the Notre-Dame Cathedral reminds us of the burning of the Talmud which took place in front of the church in 1244."

Even to this day, many Jews lament this 13th-century event

This incident, which actually occurred in 1242, was culmination of the Disputation of Paris two years earlier, in which there was a public debate between Christian scholars led by the Franciscan Jewish convert Nicholas Donin, and leading Jewish scholars. The subject of debate were the specific anti-Christian and general anti-Gentile passages in the Talmud, especially those deemed blasphemous against Jesus and Mary. Rather than massacre Jews, the Christians reacted in a public burning of well over a thousand volumes of the Talmud - not realizing it was committed to memory by many Jewish sages and contained within other Jewish religious works.

The bonfire occurred in the Place de Grève (now called the Place de l'Hotel de Ville), within sight of the majestic Notre Dame cathedral, whose construction began in 1160 and completed by 1260. This 13th-century event has been cited by a French-born Orthodox Rabbi named Shlomo Aviner, who is considered one of the spiritual leaders of the Religious Zionist movement. Far from being merely a "radical rabbi", he holds influence as rabbi of the Bet El settlement on the West Bank and "Rosh Yeshiva" of the Yeshivat Ateret Yerushalayim near the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. His words are routinely printed in Israeli newspapers as worthy of consideration in religious matters.

He made the relevant comments on Wednesday (17th April) in a Q&A column on the website Srugim, in response to the question: "The great Christian Church in Paris is on fire. Should we feel sorry for that, or should we rejoice, as it is idolatry, which is a mitzvah to burn?" He first weighed the question of it being a divine vengeance by concluding it was "possible to say so" because: "Indeed, Christianity is a goddess disguised in the belief in unity [monotheism]. But working the father and his son together is idolatry. Christianity is our number one enemy throughout history. [They] tried to convert us by arguments and by force, carried out an inquisition against us, burned the Talmud, expulsions, pogroms. Western anti-Semitism draws from Christianity's hatred of the 'murderers of God.' It also had a role in the Holocaust."




Screenshot of Aviner's statements, reproduced by Mondoweiss

These are all standard talking-points of various Jewish leaders, academics and rabbis, who see "anti-Semitism" as innate within European heritage and history, failing to introspectively ask themselves why Jews were expelled from 109 various countries of different ethnicities, languages and religions, if not perhaps the supremacist mentality and actions bred from the very Talmud whose burning he lamented. Rabbi Avineri continued his answer:

"The first great Talmud burning happened in Paris, right there at the Notre Dame Cathedral square. It was the result of the Paris trial in which Jewish sages were forced to debate Christian sages, and the result was the burning of the Talmud. Volumes of Talmud were brought in 20 carts and burned there, 1,200 Talmud volumes. So 'there is justice and there is a judge'.

"This isn't our job for now. There is no mitzvah to seek out churches abroad and burn them down. In our holy land, however, the issue is more complicated. Indeed, the Satmar Rebbe, in one of is arguments against returning to the land of Israel, wrote that there is a commandment here to burn churches, and the failure to do so is a transgression. Yet Rabbi Menachem Mendel Kasher, in his book 'The Great Period', rejected the Satmar Rebbe's words, citing a midrash, forbidding burning [churches] since if we burn, we'll have to rebuild, and it's a greater sin to rebuild [a church] than leave it standing. That church in Paris, too, will surely be rebuilt."

Aviner

This last statement is especially significant, first because "this isn't our job, for now" is a nod to the messianic impulse, where its believed it will be achieved by their "moshiach" so that its now merely a question of timing. Second, that in lieu of this "moshiach" the State of Israel itself is regarded as the staging ground for such actions which might not be acceptable elsewhere, if for nothing else in the realm of Public Relations so as to not provoke outrage against Jews. Aviner only opposes burning a church or other Gentile religious site, although stressing its a different case within Israel, for fear it would then be rebuilt. But simply allowing those sites to fall into disrepair would absolve Jews from the possible "sin".

The Satmar Rebbe he cited as scion of an anti-Zionist branch of Haredi Judaism, but his words affirm something I have long believed: That far from being the "Torah-true" Jews they are passed off as, the ultra-Orthodox "anti-Zionist" Jews are just as Talmudic and their objections to Israel are a matter of timing. But if it was a matter of their "moshiach", they would completely accept all the actions and more of what Israel is doing. The specific words cited by Aviner suggest that Jews in the "Holy Land" would have more responsibility to eradicate all traces of the "idolatrous" Gentile places, so that rather than "sin" by not fulfilling such a responsibility they regarded it as better to simply wait until their "moshiach" appears to lead the way.

Aviner has deep connections in various segments of the Israeli state, as we can see from this section on his yeshiva's website: "Over the course of the Yeshiva's thirty years existence, the Yeshiva's approximately 2000 graduates have established themselves in a wide variety of professions fields.  Dispersed throughout the country, these men now serve as heads of educational institutions, pre-military and other yeshivot, as senior IDF officers and in key security positions.  Others are active in law, media, hi-tech, management and business."





With Jerusalem as symbolic center of three continents, this
image is much-displayed on many Zionist websites

These obviously include political and academic leaders; their including of "senior officers" learning under the teachings of this faithful servant of the Talmud who holds "idolatrous" Gentiles in such contempt, are worrying on so many levels. Also significant is the mention of business and hi-tech, given the growth of Israel as a primary factor in global cyber-security and other hi-tech firms, tied to their central role in the Chinese-inspired Silk Road/Belt Road Initiative and the push for a "multi-polar world" (a mere rhetorical buzzword to adding another dialectic pole to the Globalist order).

Clearly, the opinions of Aviner carry at least some weight and this is more so when we consider that in 2013, he confirmed that he had been sent to Iran on a mission for Mossad in 1979. He confirmed this in an interview for a religious website called "Kippah": "I received a phone call. 'Shlomo, we need you.'" According to the newspaper Yediot Ahronot, Mossad sent Aviner on a French passport using his aunt's "international chandelier business in France" as the cover to send information back to Israel. The cover was as a representative of the French Rabbinate to provide Iranian Jews with matzos for Passport. But what was the rabbi really up to? "By Way of Deception"....


Primary Sources:
1. "Radical rabbi says Notre Dame fire retribution for 13th-century Talmud burning"
2. "Haredi Media Highlights Medieval Burning of Talmud After Notre-Dame Fire"
3. "After Notre Dame fire, leading Israeli rabbi says ‘There is no mitzvah to [burn down] churches abroad. In our holy land, however, the issue is more complicated’"