The War Machine Strikes Back: Is Trump Finally Reining in on Netanyahu and War-Profiteers?

 by Sean Jobst

18 November 2020

   In my previous post, I mentioned a Zoom call of leftist bureaucrats openly calling for a "coup". They included Maria Stephan, an academic involved with the Orwellian-named Institute of Peace - staffed with various interventionist dregs of the Republican and Democratic Parties. One of her associates at the Institute is ex-Secretary of Defense Mike Esper, whom Trump recently fired in a shake-up at the Pentagon that saw Esper's allies resigning and replaced by Trump loyalists who support his withdrawal from foreign wars. A second Trump administration would likely not include a large number of its current cabinet members, so there's some kind of shift. A series of recent events could shed light on whether Trump is reining in on his close relationship with Netanyahu and purging war-profiteers from the Department of Defense - or whether there's more than meets the eye. As is often the case, the reality seems complicated but is worth decoding.

   Among the world leaders congratulating "President-Elect" Joe Biden after his crowning by the Establishment, was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who tweeted on Nov. 8, 12:03 AM: "Congratulations @JoeBiden and @KamalaHarris. Joe, we've had a long & warm personal relationship for nearly 40 years, and I know you as a great friend of Israel. I look forward to working with both of you to further strengthen the special alliance between the U.S. and Israel." This came despite four years of Trump's kowtowing: Green-lighting annexation of the Golan Heights; moving the embassy to Jerusalem; brokering and enforcing peace deals with several Arab countries; approving sale of the F-35; and allowing the continued subversion of American hi-tech and cyber-security firms by start-ups linked to alumni of Israeli Military Intelligence's Unit 8200 in spite of the vow to "MAGA". (Biden has his own Unit 8200 links via his two WestExec advisors, Michèle Flournoy and Tony Blinken). 

   Esper was apparently fired for two reasons. In June, he openly disputed Trump's suggestion that U.S. troops be deployed to quash violent Antifa and BLM riots across the nation. More recently, Esper publicly disagreed with the withdrawal from Afghanistan that has been advocated by Trump. The first public announcement by his successor, the National Counterterrorism Center director Christopher Miller, has been an American withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan by January 2021. The outcry from the MSM reveals an established consensus that sees the U.S. military's role as carrying out the policies of lobbyists, war-profiteers, and the Military-Industrial Complex abroad, while denying internal security, such as protecting the borders they want unfettered, and deterring the riots they have been inciting. Their vision is of a militarized society, not with an armed citizenry such as the military, but with contractor firms and privately-run militaries overseen by an authoritarian federal government.

   A few days after the Pentagon shake-up, outgoing Syria war envoy James Jeffrey admitted that he and others lied about the number of American troops in Syria, whenever Trump pushed them for a complete end to American meddling in that conflict. "We were always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had there," Jeffrey said. "In each case, we then decided to come up with five better arguments for why we needed to stay. And we succeeded both times." Its peculiar that Jeffrey was hired the first place, as one of the signatories of the infamous "Never Trump" letter in August 2016, and now advises Biden. The MSM is so deranged with Trump they framed the story in a way to ridicule Trump, missing the point that this is treason because they have long lied and championed for America's entanglements in Syria and elsewhere. We could expect a return to the Bush/Obama status quo of foreign wars under a Biden/Harris administration, given the assorted Neocons and liberal interventionists surrounding them.

   One of the most noticeable results of the Trump administration has been the realignment within American politics, with assorted Neocons and old-style "Never Trump" Republicans aligning with and coalescing around the Biden/Harris campaign. George W. Bush has openly supported and congratulated Biden. Dick Cheney's daughter, Liz Cheney, has been a public critic of Trump, while Biden has praised the legacy of her father. Among the Bush cronies to have supported and endorsed Biden were Colin Powell, the Secretary of State who pushed the Iraq WMD lie; Tom Ridge, first secretary of the Homeland Security department created by that same administration that brought us the bipartisan Patriot Act; William H. Webster, former CIA Director and chief of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Dov Zakheim, staunchly-Zionist Under Secretary of Defense; John Negroponte, the career diplomat with a decades-long warmonger record across the world; Philip Zelikow, executive director of the 9/11 Commission that rubber-stamped the official story; and Bush's Neocon speechwriter David Frum. They also include Bill Kristol, the "godfather" of Neoconservatism, and both founders of the neocon think-tank Project for the New American Century, Eliot Cohen and Robert Kagan.

   Its inexplicable why Trump hired some of the people he did in the first place, the likes of the warmonger John Bolton and others who showed their interests were always for Israel and not America. The darkest spot around Trump for me has always been the people he surrounds himself with, such as a Chabad-linked Jared Kushner or the Israel-obsessed religious fanatic Mike Pompeo. I called out these foreign policy links even before the 2016 election, yet these four years I have seen Trump pull away from these wars. The Overton Window has shifted towards non-interventionism for a large segment of the Republican Party in a way I never saw before. I agree with what IT security specialist Patrick Bergy said (as often cited by Australian researcher Brendon O'Connell): "They're using it however it benefits them. If it benefits them to attack Trump, they will attack Trump. If it benefits them to use Trump to hurt their enemies, then they will use Trump to hurt their enemies. It has nothing to do with politics. It's all about power and profit. People have to get the politics out of their mind with this. Once you can accept that, it starts making sense."

   As O'Connell has noted, among the worst of the activist network around Trump is Roger Stone, who continues to be tied to certain Neocons and sidelined Steve Bannon who at least criticizes Kissinger, the "party of Davos", and international bankers (even while failing to see the Israel component of that power-order); and "former" CFR member and Kissinger associate, Steve Pieczenick, who seems to have enabled Kissinger back into the White House despite Kissinger's previous criticism of Trump at the World Economic Forum on the very day of Trump's inauguration. Aware of an American public more awake to the reality of these wars, the CFR has been positioning Kissinger as representing "realism": "Welcome Back to Kissinger's World: Neoconservatism has died, and liberal internationalism is discredited. Perhaps it's time to return to the ideas of one of the last century's greatest realists." The reality is that he doesn't represent a shift, but is part of the synthesis under a new name between those two poles of interventionism - part of the political realignment we see under Biden/Harris.

   It could be that the network has something on Trump, or he sees something of his own personal interests in those who so blatantly disregard any "MAGA" agenda. Despite being called a "Fascist" by large segments of the Left, Trump's approach has been remarkably hands-off and less authoritarian than previous Presidents, a corollary of which is his enablement of certain other appointees who have their own agendas. An illustration of this trend is the person of Miles Taylor, who was an "internal Resistance" leaker while Chief of Staff to former Homeland Security Secretaries Nielsen and McAleenan. (As we see with the recent firing of Chris Krebs, who denied any fraud in the election, and the Biden affiliations of Ridge and Webster, its no surprise the DHS hired Taylor). He is a CFR member who epitomizes the convergence between Big Tech and Bureaucracy. Having earlier been a Cheney intern, he endorsed Biden because Trump wasn't interested in his pet foreign policy proposals: "What we saw week in and week out, for me, after two and a half years in that administration, was terrifying. We would go in to try to talk to him about a pressing national security issue—cyberattack, terrorism threat—he wasn't interested in those things. To him, they weren't priorities."

   One of the possible counterbalances to this network could be Retired Army Col. Douglas Macgregor, recently hired as Miller's Senior Advisor at the Pentagon. In an interview on Tucker Carlson's Fox News show, Macgregor shed light on the inexplicable: "I think President Trump lost control over the whole appointment process and staffing the government shortly after the election. I don't know the details, but he ended up appointing large numbers of people who subsequently brought in their friends, almost all of whom were opposed to Donald Trump and his agenda." Macgregor's foreign policy views are complex but generally he is skeptical of interventionism.

   An initial supporter of the Iraq War, by 2008 Macgregor admitted that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars "produced very serious and negative consequences for American national-security interests." He has been outspoken on European affairs, including a courageous criticism of Angela Merkel's migration policies and the shame/guilt complex forced upon Germany as a "sick mentality". Unfortunately, Macgregor has often appeared on Kremlin-state media supporting Russia's invasion of eastern Ukraine and denying a distinct Ukrainian identity there. Given this, what we can expect from him is the positive trend of an American withdrawal coupled with the negative trend of America's place simply being taken up by the Russian partner of the "multipolar" alliance (with Israel and Communist China). A truly "America-First" policy would advocate a final end to these wars and adventures overseas, coupled with a vigilance about this multipolar alliance and its subversion of the American hi-tech sector. 

   On Nov. 13, the CNN warmongers at CNN reported with alarm Macgregor's outspoken views against the stranglehold AIPAC has over American foreign policy. His remarks were also picked up by Haaretz in an analysis blocked to non-subscribers (but available elsewhere). In a 2019 interview, he said that Pompeo "has his hands out for money from the Israeli lobby, the Saudis and others", and Bolton "has become very, very rich and is in the position he's in because of his unconditional support for the Israeli lobby. He is their man on the ground, in the White House." Concerning the anti-Iran warmongers: "You have to look at the people that donate to those individuals," because AIPAC has "enormous quantities of money that over many years have cultivated an enormous influence in power in Congress." 

   Macgregor said in a 2012 RT interview: "I think the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee and its subordinate elements or affiliated elements that represent enormous quantities of money that over many years have cultivated an enormous influence in power in Congress. I think you've got a lot of people on the Hill who fall into two categories - one category that is interested in money and wants to be reelected, and they don't want to run the risk of the various lobbies that are pushing military action against Iran to contribute money to their opponents." He has been accused of "anti-Semitism" by the thought-police (ADL and AIPAC), but these are belied by his support for the Golan Heights annexation and U.S. embassy moving to Jerusalem. He appears close to Israeli Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Aviv Kochavi, who made Macgregor's book "Transformation under Fire" required reading for officials with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel and above. 

   Kochavi was Director of Israeli Military Intelligence (Aman) from 2010 to 2014, so would have overseen Unit 8200's activities. And on Nov. 12th, Kochavi held a virtual meeting with U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley to discuss "the current situation in the region and Israel-USA military cooperation." This indicates that despite Netanyahu's acceptance of Biden, that cooperation remains either way. So the answer to that question of reining in on Netanyahu is an unfortunate "No" although it should still serve as a wake-up call that any "America-First" policy can never include a "special" relationship with Israel which will always subvert America's actual interests. Bret Stephens, the staunch-Zionist New York Times columnist and former Jerusalem Post editor, said it bluntly: "Israel will not be safe in an America First world." Its no accident that Neocons and other Zionists decry any return to a non-interventionist foreign policy as "anti-Semitic" and specifically denounce even the "America-First" slogan.

   Despite stark differences in domestic policies and vision between Trump and Biden, it would be business as usual with Israel. The tweet indicates Netanyahu sees Trump's fortunes as losing to Biden's apparent coronation - all are expendable when someone else comes along who can serve his purposes more. This should nevertheless be treated like a betrayal for a President who has shown he values personal loyalty with his various firings (including various figures who shouldn't have been hired in the first place). Personal loyalties should at least sway policies where broader considerations of America's interests were ignored before, which is foremost to end the hi-tech and cyber-security subversion by Israeli intelligence in close collusion with Chinese intelligence. 

   The main difference on the latter count is China, with Beijing Biden's deep links to various Chinese government firms documented as are his championing of trade deals that would benefit the Belt and Road as clearly as his domestic policies suits the World Economic Forum's Great Reset. There should not be any special pandering to one country, such as has been done with countless billions of taxpayer dollars delivered to Israel. This also includes reducing the U.S. State Department to being Israel's enforcer, whether its the wars for Israel under the Bush and Obama administrations, or the peace deals for Israel and sanctions against its enemies which are the hallmark of Trump's Mideast policy. Perhaps its time to be a "heretic" in this age of the Big Lie and the same tired old political dogmas as we have been conditioned to accept. 

   The Overton Window has shifted towards ending this legacy of wars and interventions - and this will obviously continue with a second Trump administration. So the answer to the question about reining in the war-profiteers seems to be a firm "Yes", as they seem to be shifting more towards the Democratic Party's strange tripartite alliance of Liberal Corporatists, Neocons, and Far-Left Socialists/Communists. Given the Trotskyite roots of Neoconservatism, this isn't surprising; nor given the fact that Big Business and Wall Street interests have never seen any contradiction between their profits and bankrolling Communist revolutions and movements. This triple alliance is epitomized by a Biden/Harris administration that will turn back the clock to that entire disgusting legacy. Just as there is a shifting in political alignments, there should be a fundamental re-evaluation coupled with an unwavering rejection of that legacy. But for the time-being, all Americans and others of conscience and principles should celebrate this closing of the dark chapters that are America's entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Millions of low-information voters will indeed clap
with enthusiasm as they fall asleep during his wars

Spoiled Bureaucrats Plot 'Coup' on Leaked Zoom Call

 by Sean Jobst

13 November 2020

"We also are often saying that: 'Call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not.'"

   Those were the stunning words of someone identified by the Orwellian name "Facilitator - RG" on a Zoom call leaked earlier this month by the watchdog group Sunrise Exposed. The call was part of a "training session" hosted by the leftist activist group ShutDown DC for federal employees on how to use their capacity as civil servants within various government agencies, to "slow down" and "shut down" the Trump Administration to aid outside Leftist groups and causes. It was held under the auspices of the Sunrise Movement, an umbrella movement of 400 affinity groups centered around climate change and linked to Extinction Rebellion's activities within America. ShutDown DC published a "Disruption Guide" that planned "mass, sustained disruptive movements all over the country", in what appears similar to the mass organized and well-funded NGO efforts that destabilized other countries. Its not a stretch to suggest some of those same forces involved at various levels here too.  

   The exact time and date of the Zoom call is unclear, but is possibly the "Democracy Is In Our Hands" event dated Oct. 27th 8pm ET, associated with a document by leftist activist Jeremy Brecher. An early proponent of the man-made climate change alarmism, Brecher was a visiting fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a D.C.-based elitist think-tank founded with Wall Street money and accused of having been a KGB front by a Soviet defector; it has connections to the BLM leaders. Brecher's work there included working with Bernie Sanders on "Sustainable Development" before it was adopted as part of the United Nations' Agenda 21 (now 2030). The document warned of a "Trump coup", but this is a clear sign of projection - a Presidential candidate using the judicial process to challenge the results of an election that was very narrow in several crucial states and defined by mounting evidence of improprieties is less of a "coup" than select government bureaucrats openly talking about using their positions to shut down the Administration in collusion with outside groups.

   The Zoom session started with the various participants touting their credentials and titles: "management programs analyst"; "I work in the National Security community"; "I spent three-and-a-half years as a contractor at DHS HQ". Its alarming that such ideological zealots are highly placed within such agencies as the Department of Homeland Security and the National Security apparatus. Yet its not surprising, given what a whistleblower exposed about indoctrination at the Sandia National Laboratories. This mixture of a dogmatic ideology, rejection of all those outside that ideology, and an apocalyptic vision of the world if one fails to act in a certain way, held by an untold number of bureaucrats is certainly problematic. We can expect such indoctrination within government agencies to intensify with a Biden/Harris Administration.

   One zealot identifying himself as "Komrade Lokh" boasted of collusion with media: "Leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me, to be the source of the leaks." One of the few using her actual full name on the call was Maria Stephan, an academic who serves as Director of the program on nonviolent action at the federal United States Institute of Peace - funded by such agencies as the Defense and State Departments, USAID, and Congress. In a blatant Orwellian inversion, the "Institute for Peace" is staffed with various interventionist Democratic and Republican past officials and academics (including the recently-ousted Secretary of Defense Mike Esper). Stephan was lead foreign affairs officer at the Department of Defense's Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations and NATO headquarters. 

   In appreciation for her work on "regime change" through "civil resistance", Stephan was awarded the inaugural Henry J. Leir Human Security Award by the Carnegie Foundation-funded Institute for Human Security at Tufts University in Bedford, MA in 2015. Stephan - whose profile page at the Institute cryptically says "On sabbatical to focus on domestic democracy work" - boasted of collusion between these civil servants and outside activists: "Groups on the outside, being able to show solidarity with federal works." Quoting Harry S. Truman - "I thought I was the president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing" - Stephan boasted of bureaucrats' power over government:

   "The bottom line is that we all—as ordinary people, um, and as federal workers—have power. If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar, and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process: They know how to speed things up; they know how to slow them down; they have access to critical information about policies that are being considered or implemented; they can participate in an internal decision-making; they can provide or deny knowledge or expertise that those at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole need."

   Stephan continued: "We are talking about the range of different tactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission." One of the former is "creating parallel structures and organizing units." After naming three of four groups "preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, um, that, you know, there - that the election goes sideways", she spoke in revolutionary terms: "They are in the vanguard of helping people think about how to interpret red lines and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond street protests and demonstrations." One "Facilitator - Nadine" cited the BLM movement as one such "vanguard" organization.

They produced a map of the areas of D.C.
where they planned certain actions to
shut down or "take over" key buildings

   Among the others listed are We Count On Us and Hold the Line, a leftist evangelical "political activist movement to engage the church and millennials who have been inactive in the past elections." The fourth group is Choose Democracy, which defines its mission in relation to an alleged "coup" - yet another example of projection, accusing one's opponent for something you're actually guilty of: "Our work involves psychological preparation, lessons from history, and strategic sensibility." The Big Lie repetition about a "coup" that was repeated months leading up to the election, is a "psychological preparation" meant to condition people for what would follow. The myriad of media elites and think-tanks these "revolutionaries" are colluding with are now setting the tone of the discourse, knowing that unfortunately a large number of people will be programmed by their talking-points. This contributed to the many emotional low-information voters who thought they were fighting for "democracy" by enabling a candidacy of  two career politicians who created, sponsored, and presided over among the most atrocious Police State, mass surveillance, crime bills, warmongering, and Wall Street bailout legislation ever conceived within these United States.

   Projection is on full display with the climate change alarmism, as it has nothing to do with the environment but everything to do with authoritarianism. One need only look at the various elite connections and social status of these leading advocates. The group affiliated with the Zoom call, Sunrise Movement, arose from a predecessor called the Sunrise Movement Education Fund, incorporated in January 2014 with a $30,000 grant plus free office space provided by the Sierra Club. Its founder was Dartmouth College and Wesleyan University visiting professor, Michael K. Dorsey, and two former Wesleyan students: Evan Weber and Matthew Lichtash. Dorsey was an NGO representative on the U.S. State Department delegation to the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, which formulated the "sustainable development" authoritarian touted by these elite bureaucratic organizations using ecology as the excuse. In 1993, he served on the task force for Bill Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development. Dorsey is affiliated with the elitist Club of Rome - the profile has been scrubbed but that the URL exists demonstrates it existed at some point. He was an environmental advisor for the Obama campaign and served as a member of the Advisory Committee of the EPA during his Administration. 

Logo of the Sunrise Movement

This doomsday cult wants their dogma to be the
basis of government - and Biden they see as the
candidate most willing to implement their vision.

   The key thing to note about these phony "environmentalists" is they advocate a top-down approach, dictating to the masses one rule while holding to a different rule themselves. Founded in April 2017, the Sunrise Movement is a 501(c)(4) political action organization linked to Extinction Rebellion - a group with its own elitist connections. It works closely with Democratic Socialist politicians like Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, to lobby for the coercive Green New Deal. Its about selectively manipulating "science" much like the Covid lockdowns pushed by these same authoritarians. At the lower levels of both are people who treat it like a cult, with all the same characteristics of an organized religion and the stark, apocalyptic vision of a doomsday cult. 

   They are detached from the environment, disconnected as they are within their crowded tightly-managed cities and Ivory Tower bubbles. That same environment they want to manage because they see it as fully dependent upon human action. Yet I know as a Pagan that it has a consciousness of its own, that the climate is cyclical (as even a reading of history attests) and the Earth sustains and heals itself; it is much stronger than such "climate change" cultists imagine. Real ecological abuse is ignored by such cultists, because it would not lend itself to an authoritarian control over people and resources as much as some apocalyptic myth about an "extinction". They are out of balance with Nature, which is why they're obsessed with top-down managerial structures that have to step in with the "solutions". That imbalance is also seen with their projection, a tactic on one hand but looking at the sad husks in the video, we can also say its a sad substitute for an identity that gives meaning to their hollowed lives.  

   Perhaps these bureaucrats (with their bloated paychecks and privileged lives) are just waxing fantasies about "revolution" and a "coup", yet their positions combined with their coordination with well-funded activist groups shows some kind of subversion. That they were working within various government agencies, its not outside the realm of strong possibility that some may also be placed in positions to oversee the handling and counting of ballots, especially with the growing number of various whistleblowers coming forward with signed affidavits that they witnessed individuals who committed various improprieties. Regardless of elections, there is a bureaucracy that has long been entrenched - its just that now, there is a dogmatic ideology animating some of them, so that every measure they take to undermine the "democratic" will of people (perversely in the name of "democracy"), to enlarge and expand the scope of government, they justify under that ideology. Astute men within our country's history have warned about the power of this bureaucracy.

A Coup by Any Other Name is still a Coup - Decoding the Election Realities

by Sean Jobst

11 November 2020

   Count me as one more person calling out the election shenanigens. Whatever one may think about voting itself, I reject this blatant attempt by the political establishment, corrupt city Democratic Party machines, corporate media, and Big Tech billionaires to declare the winner. They are falling over themselves anointing Biden and Harris, even as no state has certified their results, margins remain very small in several key states, and evidence continues to mount of improprieties (if not outright fraud) in the very states that apparently tipped the balance. Repeating that something doesn't exist, with the media corporations and Big Tech working overtime in openly discounting it, does not change reality.

   The same Covid they used as the excuse to slip in this massive mail-in voting system - obviously more prone to numbers manipulating and not as verifiable as in-person voting - instantly evaporated as masses of TDS sufferers celebrated in city streets across the nation, literally dropping their masks in the process. So invested were all their energies into hating Trump, as if his very existence triggered all their emotions so their own existence depended on him, that these low-information voters would overlook the actual records of the demented jester and the psychopath opportunist. Such voters endorsed even if ignorantly, the millions of lives killed or destroyed by their various warmongering, Police State, authoritarian policies. 

   There are two components here. One are the growing calls for Trump to "concede" coupled with the congratulations going to Biden/Harris, from various Neocons and Establishment figures. The likes of Bush and Romney who represent the same Corporatist, Police State, Warmongering consensus as Biden/Harris. Attorney Benjamin Ginsburg, who had been National Counsel to the presidential campaigns of Bush/Cheney and Romney, has openly aligned with the pro-Biden media establishment. We witnessed a political shift these last four years, disrupting the two parties. On one side is this disgusting alliance of Corporatists, Neocons, and Leftists coalescing around the anointed ones. On the other side are such drifts as the #WalkAway movement and the traditionally "Democratic" demographics Trump outperformed with. I'll speak more on this in future articles, but the important thing to note is those forces coalescing around Biden/Harris is an augury for what we could expect from such an Administration - but some disruption of the establishment. 

   The second component is the mounting evidence of various improprieties in the actual voting process - that the media and other Establishment simply won't even consider it and repeat their denials like the Big Lie technique doesn't change the actual evidence. They are pulling a bait-and-switch upon the American people, knowing full well that so many will be lulled into sleep by this charm - oblivious to how the process actually works beyond prepackaged media mantras. Indeed, its no accident the vote totals of the crucial states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Arizona froze in time roughly around "Witching Hour" in the eastern half of the country (3-4 am), as ridiculously high levels of mail-in votes started to tip the scales in these states for Biden. 

   Those differences in mail-in ballots just happened to be most evident in three states - Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia - that have no rule forcing machine ballot totals to be hand-checked by paper. There was less of a mail-in vote disparity between Trump and Biden in states which tabulated their totals on election night. Only in these pre-dawn hours was Biden getting vote totals of 90-100% in these holdout states, against all mathematical probability. The conservative Judicial Watch noted voter registration rates exceeding 100% in 353 counties in 29 states totaling 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens - make what you will about their report, but certainly they aren't inherently less believable than the liberal/leftist MSM with its own blatant bias. Voter registration and turnout numbers reached not just improbable but outright impossible numbers. 

   A precinct in Orange County, Florida, reported a registered voter turnout of 102%. The University of Central Florida reported a whopping 107.56%. The total "exceeded 100%" in Oconto County, Wisconsin. Then there was the over 100% results in many Milwaukee suburbs: "a data anomaly created by new voter registrations on top of near-total participation among voters who had registered in advance of Election Day." This exceeds even countries like Australia where voting is compulsory, but are taken as indicators of "vote rigging" in other countries. Biden's votes in most cities across the country were lower than Hillary's in 2016, yet we're supposed to believe he had massive turnout in just these cities in states leading for Trump up until these pre-dawn hours? Statisticians and mathematicians noted the numbers in these crucial places violated Benford's Law against all numerical possibilities. This law states that "any random numbers will have a specific result as to which digits appear first in each data set." When anomalies occur despite this law, its taken as a tell-tale sign of numbers being manipulated. Mark Twain's old adage about "lies, damned lies, and statistics" has never been more true.

   Back in August, even the New York Times and other MSM outlets admitted mail-in fraud in a Patterson, New Jersey election on May 12th, although it quickly denied potential "national trouble" to put lingering skepticism to rest. A city councilman and three others were caught in what even CNN called "voter fraud". In September, a whistleblower exposed ballot harvesting in Minneapolis, during a 38-day period when the law allowing for an unlimited number was being challenged. Then in October, there were MSM reports about a fraudster caught registering dead people in Broward County, Florida; thousands of people requesting ballots that never arrived in a Pennsylvania county that just happened to favor Trump; and a mayoral candidate was caught forging 84 voter applications in Carrollton, Texas. Are we to serious believe this entire system worked out its flaws by election night, with absolutely "no evidence" of improprieties? In just one case, a Texas social worker was recently caught submitting 67 voter registrations without the signatures and consent of the residents at an assisted living facility.

   In a campaign video released on 24 October 2020, Biden said: "We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." It was picked up as a stunning admission by one side, while the MSM quickly ran cover for him - saying it was taken out of context and he was merely referring to an organization to prevent voter fraud. I agree that despite his long record of gaffes, the 47-year career politician is slick enough to not make such a admission. But what his defenders are missing - and I wish many on the Trump side would be careful with running away with information, too - is the fact that Biden alluded to any possible voter fraud in the first place. That he would outright suggest there is a possible voter fraud, despite the categorical dismissals now by his campaign and its backers, would suggest they would be singing a different tune if election night turned out a different way than the current deadlocked result declared Biden's way.

   This is the same cognitive dissonance of people who tout their "international" perspective, revealing themselves to be projecting exceptionalists to deny there can be corruption in America; that these political party machines are products of other countries but not America. Yet even this claim is selective, as seen by their partisan outcry about the 2016 election and the chain of politically-motivated investigations that flopped. Media corporations should not be the ones calling and deciding elections. The way they cover these elections, for example calling some states one way and others "too close to call" even while both examples have the same type of numbers, shows its partisan and arbitrary. Perhaps the masses of TDS-sufferers who tout their "social justice" credentials don't have a problem (so long as they finance their own favored causes), but I certainly have a problem with billionaires and oligarchs peddling so much influence in our society. The media's modus operandi has been to deny and dismiss all allegations of election fraud in this election, while refusing to even investigate it.

   We have seen a string of anecdotal evidence throughout this year that appears to be some kind of bureaucratic coup - bloodless (not counting the deaths caused by "peaceful protests") but a coup none the less. In June, we witnessed the Transition Integrity Project, a simulation that favored Biden and convened under the claim that Trump would "seek to manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt the 2020 presidential election and transition process." The simulation was organized by Rosa Brooks, a former counselor to Biden foreign policy advisor Michèle Flournoy during the Obama Administration. Her other listed affiliations include the World Economic Forum, Council on Foreign Relations, and former Special Counsel to George Soros' Open Society Institute, who has spoken there on the subject of "America is in a constant state of war." Other participants in the simulation included Clinton advisor John Podesta, former chairs of the Democratic and Republican National Committees (Donna Brazile and Michael Steele), and three leading Neocons (William Kristol, Max Boot, David Frum). Boot touted it as a "war game" in the Washington Post. In October, liberal war-monger and former CFR Senior Fellow Peter Beinart called for "international intervention" if Trump refused to "concede" the election.

   On the eve of the election, leftist activist group ShutDown DC hosted a Zoom call that was a "training session" for various government employees affiliated with the Sunrise Movement, a pro-Green New Deal activist group affiliated with both Extinction Rebellion and Democratic Socialists. They openly spoke about "leaking" information from their various departments and agencies in an effort to "sabotage", one of the "facilitators" on the video openly saying: "It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not." Maria Stephan, an academic and activist who has openly spoken on the need for "regime change" through civil resistance, appeared on the call boasting of their power as bureaucrats: "The bottom line is that we all - as ordinary people, um, and as federal workers - have power. If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar, and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process." Are we to believe they haven't coordinated efforts with untold numbers of other ideological subversives within government agencies, including some involved in handling and counting ballots? 

   This latter proposition is the most significant - it need only be part of the chain of command in certain post office branches or poll stations to have affected the results in some precincts. The ongoing lawsuit that the MSM automatically dismisses by refusing to consider it at all, includes no less than seventy eyewitnesses who signed affidavits under penalty of perjury, stating they witnessed voting irregularities. One Nevada whistleblower alleged that Clark County supervisors counted mail-in ballots with no concern whether the signatures were valid. Another claimed poll workers fabricated proof of residence for voters who had moved outside Nevada. Municipal clerks and votes counters across Wisconsin were accused of unlawfully altering thousands of ballots, including filling out signatures themselves. In a video that appears suppressed down the Memory Hole, a Michigan whistleblower who worked at the Barlow branch of the Traverse City post office told Project Veritas: "We were issued a directive this morning [November 4th] to collect any ballots we find in mailboxes, collection boxes, just outgoing mail in general. Separate them at the end of the day so that they could hand stamp them from standard letter mail so they can hand stamp them with yesterday's date [election day] and put them through." 

   An FBI agent was exposed intimidating Pennsylvania USPS whistleblower Richard Hopkins, who also said ballots were back-dated to election day. Hopkins has publicly refuted notions that he "recanted" as was claimed by the Washington Post in an obvious coordination between media and bureaucracy. Poll watchers were being obstructed from many stations in Michigan and Pennsylvania, contrary to election laws that allow for those observers. This includes some stations in Detroit that were covering their windows so no one could see the counting process. What is there to hide? With both Wisconsin and Michigan going heavily for Trump on election night, vote dumps early Wednesday morning went 100% for Biden. This includes a magical trove of 138,339 votes in Michigan, which was censored by Twitter. A losing county commissioner in Rochester Hills, MI, was re-elected after a glitch was discovered that changed a 1,127-vote win into a 104-vote loss. A Virginia data scientist tweeted pictures of a software glitch in her state that made 169,000 votes disappear within thirty minutes.

   At the center of the election-day glitches were voting machines made by Dominion Voting Systems, a Canadian-based multinational corporation whose lobbying firm is Brownstein, Farber Hyatt & Schreck, which just so happens to be associated with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's former chief-of-staff, Nadeam Elshami. Dominion's machines are installed across the country, including the crucial states of Michigan and Georgia. A Michigan county clerk found that 6,000 votes for Trump, were instead counted for Biden in Antrim County. That glitch was discovered and fixed, but the same machines are used in 47 counties across Michigan. There is something within the software that "skewed" the results. Georgia "rushed" to install Dominion's machines ahead of election day and, just as with Michigan, there have been glitches. A report by Fox5 Atlanta noted a glitch that delayed the counting of 80,000 absentee ballots in Gwinnett County, yet officials went through with the results anyway; it reported the same glitch occurred earlier that morning in Spalding and Morgan Counties. These are just the glitches that were caught, but how many more in other counties and states went ahead with the results that perhaps skewed it in favor of Biden?

   The ongoing lawsuit the MSM won't even consider has brought evidence from 11,000 people documenting various incidents of fraud. Contrary to that state's own election laws, Pennsylvania officials processed 450,000 mail-in-ballots while Republican observers were kept away from polling stations. The state's Democratic Attorney General, Josh Shapiro, already called Pennsylvania for Biden in a Tweet three days before the election: "If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose." John Fetterman, the state's Bernie "Democratic Socialist" Lieutenant-Governor, told CNN in September: "I believe Pennsylvania will pick the President." We can make of these statements what we will, but certainly it lends credence to a concerted effort to sway the election towards Biden. They were acting as activists, not elected officials. 

   In 2019, the Pennsylvania legislature passed Act 77 which required all mail-in ballots be received by 8pm election night when the polls officially close: "No absentee ballot under this subsection shall be counted which is received in the office of the county board of elections later than eight o'clock P.M. on the day of the primary or election." Rather than striking down this law, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set up its own law by a vote of 4-3, that mail-in-ballots need only be postmarked by election day but allowing them to be received afterwards. Are these the sort of parallel institutions and laws advocated in the Zoom call? The U.S. Constitution itself is unequivocal that the election law this instance is with the elected legislature and not the appointed judges: "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators." (U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1)

   We don't know how this will play out. There are checks and balances in these United States for a reason, to limit the powers of one branch over another. Yet what we are seeing here is unprecedented, a massive mail-in-ballot system that was rushed through this year using Covid as the excuse. That system has been prone to various manipulations as the ample evidence above has demonstrated. Established rules were repeatedly violated throughout this process in several locations. Glitches being discovered should cast suspicion on some of the counts in other areas that use those same types of machines. We witnessed the behavior of certain bureaucrats and activists establishing contingency plans and stating certain things before the election that shouldn't be outside the realm of projecting what they intended to do themselves. There is one other thing we should remember this Veteran's Day: Civil servants, media corporations, and TV talking-heads do not call or determine elections in this constitutional Republic. We stand at the precipice now and our due vigilance is needed now more than ever. 

Options for the 2020 Election - Why I OPPOSE a Biden/Harris Administration

by Sean Jobst

29 October 2020

   This is not an endorsement. My perspective is cultural, that true changes occur within the thinking and social actions of people, not in fleeting political charades. Its a recognition that change must occur within ourselves first and then extend outward. The most lasting politics are at the local and community level, although this has been greatly complicated by an expansive federal government. One has to wonder why every four years, the oligarchs whose deep pockets direct American political discourse get the masses to drain their energy into Presidential elections, voting for their pre-selected choices. To see what's at stake with this 2020 election requires a broader 20/20 vision and not the rose-colored glasses of emotions and selective partisan outrage that are prone to ignorance and easily manipulated. 

   No matter whatever metric we use, one side is blatantly more authoritarian than the other side in its policy proposals, encroachment, and the actual record of its two leading figureheads - and that is the Democratic campaign of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Both are Establishment politicians with the decades-long taint of Police State legislation, Neoliberal economic policies, and giddy warmongering. The blood that is on their hands, the lives and livelihood their policies destroyed, the families torn apart as a direct result of their policies - nothing will ever hide the shame, no matter how much the elites are united in running cover for them. The effects their records have enabled within the culture itself are the most insidious, their current policy proposals being outer dressing for those cultural changes (as guided and manufactured by the elites) but also an augury of things to come if elected. 

The talented art of George Alexopoulos

   The alliance Harris/Biden (the actual order) represent is a tenuous one of Liberal elites, rehabilitated Neocons and old Republican elites, and Leftist activists, united around a fanatical Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) of "orange man bad" that has been their defining obsession these past four years. By its very nature its a negative alliance defined by what it opposes than positive policies, which makes it a magnet for the unprincipled, opportunists, and manipulated alike. Whatever we can say about Donald Trump - and I have my issues with him as I will discuss later - anyone with principles and common-sense, who has done their diligent research, is forced to absolutely admit that he is no worse than so many of those forces obsessed about him. Trump is certainly no savior, but for them he is merely an archetype where they can direct all their ire while lulling yet more people away from remembering their own records (often the very policies such people allegedly oppose).

   Even more than they did with Obama and Hillary Clinton, the mainstream Corporate Media, Big Tech, and the Entertainment industry (far more emphasis on industry than "entertainment" these days) have been fawning sycophants, carrying water for Biden/Harris and covering for them at every turn, even outright censoring criticism - hiding stories and their own records that cast them in an unfavorable light, such as the ongoing Hunter Biden saga, profiting from his office, and countless other scandals tossed down the Memory Hole. Perhaps its because Biden lacks the charisma or polished gaffe-free demeanors of those cold, calculated politicians - he cannot stand on his own feet, so these elites go out of their way help the basement hero. Its no surprise because Biden reveals just how unhinged he is at the slightest criticism or challenge, as he has reacted time and time again against people from all walks of life. Kamala Harris is a favorite of billionaires, delivering the people Biden cares about even while he assumes the "normal man" charade.

   Principles over Willful Ignorance. My political awakening occurred as a teenager, during the Bush administration when I opposed the wars and the expansive Patriot Act surveillance state. I was broadly a leftist of the old Ralph Nader variety, as prone to call out the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party elites as Bush and the Neocons. I saw those same elites and trendy activists lulled to sleep as Obama came to power with even more wars and the NDAA (Patriot Act 2.0). I awoke to the economic factors behind these wars and the surveillance state, indeed the very nature of the State itself, as I was newly energized as a Ron Paul libertarian. I became aware of the banking system so I saw these same activists and elites who talked a good game about the working- and middle- classes, idolize Obama who bailed out Wall Street bankers and Big Corporations. 

   The last election rolled on and I opposed all the mainstream political forces and campaigns, as my writings from throughout 2015 and 2016 attest. My libertarian grounding in a basic understanding of economics, as well as a historical and familial opposition to Communism, kept me from the silly Bernie Sanders bandwagon so many other Millennials were jumping onto. I never forgot the Democratic Party elites and Big Media who supported the wars and surveillance policies of Bush and the Neocons, or lulled to sleep by Obama who continued and even expanded those same policies but was simply more charismatic about it. Their number included Biden and Harris, and the untold number of elites and activists now cheerleading them on as the "solution" for the problems of their own making. Many sold out any semblance of principles, as quickly as their anointed Socialist continuously sold out to the oligarchs when he himself joined the millionaire class. 

 

   Moral Bankruptcy of Orange Man Bad. This mind virus reduces all political discourse to hating one man and defeating him at all costs, even if it obviously means electing two career politicians with a destructive legislative trail behind them. Principles are easily cast aside and opportunism rules the day, as the ends come to justify the means. The last four years have seen political forces re-aligning and shifting as with no other time before. I have seen the Bush dynasty and assorted Neocon critters rehabilitated by Corporate media and circle-jerks masquerading as "Entertainment". I have seen Marxist hypocrites who fall in line obediently behind Biden/Harris 2020 (united as they are in their love for the State so long as they're the ones in power). I have seen various war-profiteers and war-mongers idolized by the media. In simple terms, there is a moral bankruptcy in defining one's decision on such a hollowed basis and aligning with any of these corrupt forces that should be cast beyond the pale rather than given positions to influence.

   Riots and Marxist subversion. I have already documented the Globalist-Marxist connections of BLM and Antifa in several articles, exposing the agenda behind the riots despite media narratives that legitimize all as "peaceful protests". The level to which Big Media, Big Tech, and Hollywood elites have covered for and often bailed out rioters as eagerly as their political backers bailed out Wall Street bankers; the deep pockets of billionaires funding their causes out of a deep love for social justice (sarcasm intended); should be enough to expose these mobs as manipulated pawns. Repeated sting operations uncovered several Sanders Socialist operatives (such as Kyle Jurek, Martin Weissgerber, and Kris Jacks) admitting on camera their desire to "burn it all down" in a violent revolution and supporting Biden/Harris as the candidates they can manipulate towards these ends. The riots are a bargaining tool to impose their demands, and indeed they have been successful in many cities (using their dubious measures of success), so we can only imagine how much Biden/Harris would give in to these unelected fanatics. They are among the true powers behind that campaign as we see with the Green New Deal - and behind them are the deep pockets of oligarchs and billionaires. 

   Rona Lockdown 2.0. Biden has admitted he would impose another Coronavirus lockdown if elected, indicating how authoritarian his thinking is that the federal government could dictate state and local matters. Just as with the devastating effects his war and crime legislation have wrought over so many lives, behind his masked virtue-signaling is a cold embrace of all the personal and social problems that would inevitably come with a second lockdown. Its not about "flattening the curve" or any of the other fleeting excuses they come up with as time goes by - its purely about control and social engineering for such elites. In a dialectic inversion, the "cure" would clearly be far worse than the virus. For all their claims to "the science", theirs is nothing but an appeal to their own selected authorities because they conveniently ignore dissenting doctors who have warned of the real health problems stemming from the shutdowns. Lost on such people is Fauci's constant flip-flopping or that even the World Health Organization recently backtracked on lockdowns after advocating them the last seven months. One of the Biden emails has named Harris as one of its "domestic contacts" for their business ventures. It also names New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, which sheds some light on the broader agenda of Rona lockdowns championed by each while presiding over the policies that exacerbated that state's high death toll in the first place. Biden has even floated the idea of Cuomo as U.S. Attorney General. 

   Green (Red) New Deal. Endorsed on Biden's own website, the Green New Deal is one such area of authoritarian overreach - Globalist bureaucrats combined with Marxist ideologues as nothing but an excuse to impose their authoritarian socialism and social-engineer towards the "Great Reset". Its not about "clean energy", fighting "climate change", or achieving "net-zero emissions" - all are loaded buzzwords deliberately kept vague so as to attach any policy proposals they want to it. Its the direct path to a more militarized and authoritarian society, hidden underneath fears about an apocalyptic slippery-slope if society doesn't yield such controls to these elites. As with other policies, its one law for them and another for the masses - the latter are the ones shamed for their "carbon footprint" and their "emissions", whereas these hypocrites emit far more energy than the rest of us ever have or will. Carbon is the building block of life, so no matter how much they hide behind "the science" - ignoring all the dissenting scientists and scientific evidence - the self-anointed ones look down upon us lesser people for our "sin" of living and breathing on an Earth that has sustained us. Big Bankers would profit immensely from Biden's $1.7 trillion "climate plan", so perhaps there's another meaning behind green.

   The Trump 'Racist' Narrative. Because it has been such a defining narrative used to garner support for Biden/Harris, I will spend some attention on the MSM's "white supremacist" narrative they attach to Trump. While BLM and Antifa are burning American cities and smashing windows, and Leftist political violence is actually most prevalent now, the MSM constructs a bogeyman by conflating such cultural/civic nationalist groups as the Proud Boys (led by a man of Black Cuban descent and whose membership includes all races) with ethno- or racial nationalists, making all of them into some nebulous "far right" label they can never define. Its merely part of their "intersectional" Critical Race Theory that wants to shame all white people (except the very ones lecturing to us) as "racist" and paternalistically direct black people's thinking so these elites can control all of us through divide and conquer. Such people demand absolute allegiance to their dogmas, as I experienced personally when I wrote a 2017 Facebook post that criticized both the Alt-Right and Antifa/BLM at Charlottesville. Even the much-repeated "fine people on both sides" narrative attached to Trump was taken out of context while he has declared both Antifa and the KKK as terrorist organizations. Meanwhile, the elites idolizing Biden ignore his own praise of such organizations as "made up of many fine people". 

   Biden's Racist Record. Career politician Biden began his 47-year career with the blessings of Dixiecrat Segregationists, including his mentor James Eastland, the Mississippi Senator who openly called blacks "an inferior race". When pressed about this relationship in 2019, Biden responded: "We got things done" - an attitude we should take to heart as we look at the assorted people surrounding him now. Another Mississippi segregationist senator, John Stennis, was praised by Biden as a "hero" and "legend" who gifted him the table upon which the "Southern Manifesto" was signed in 1956. Eastland and Stennis were reliable allies as Biden was making a name for himself as the "anti-busing crusader" in 1977, during which the anointed "anti-racist" candidate openly feared "a racial jungle". In 2010, Biden eulogized West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, a long-time KKK member and recruiter. Alt-Right leader Richard Spencer publicly endorsed Biden on 24 August 2020, doubling-down on his reasons the next day. This is not surprising given that Spencer, as a National-Bolshevik subversive who has praised the Soviet Union, would be aligned with the Far-Left in their common collectivist, race-obsessed worldview and praise for Communism. 

   Those who scream "fascist" at every turn are lost for words in explaining their alignment with him, or their endorsing a man with such an ignoble record. But not much can be expected from people who are (selectively) more triggered about words taken out of context than someone's actual record. I firmly maintain my position that the most insidious people in this election are the Far-Left because they absolutely prefer Biden over Trump at all costs, many of them knowing full well Biden's record that created many of the same problems and bred the very "systemic racism" and other social "inequalities" they speak a good game about. That they would still support him in their TDS shows that all that hollowed rhetoric is nothing but an excuse used for their actual agenda which is authoritarian and Marxist. These unprincipled opportunists know a weak and demented Biden and an ambitious and psychopathic Harris would rubber-stamp their demands. 

   Biden and the Police State. If there is one defining achievement of Biden's 47-years in politics, it's his legislation that expanded and enabled the Police State at all levels. He is demented now but throughout his career waxed sadistically on his love for incarceration of non-violent "crime" offenders. Authoritarians have always expanded their control through an expanding definition of "crime", much like the wars supported by his ilk also enlarged the State. Although he is far from perfect in this regard, its the "racist/fascist" Trump who undid at least some of Biden's criminal bills with his own First Step Act in 2019, as well as presiding over a black and Hispanic incarceration rate that has been at its lowest in 31 years according to a report by the Justice Department. Quite simply, the candidates who are the harshest on issues of non-violent "criminals" (in stark contrast to "peaceful" rioters), incarceration, and the prison-industrial-complex, with a sordid track record spanning decades, its Biden and Harris.

   Their Police State legislation was about authoritarian controls and not truly about fighting "crime", picking up steam when actual crime trends were decreasing - hence his need for an expanded definition of crimes. In 1977, Biden worked to remove judicial discretion from those who "don't meet the middle-class criteria of susceptibility to rehabilitation." He entered the 1980s as a leading Drug Warrior, working alongside rehabilitated segregationist Strom Thurmond in establishing mandatory minimum sentences for all drug offenses, raising maximum sentences, and creating the modern system of civil asset forfeiture that enables the government to seize the money and property of accused without charging them with a crime. He co-sponsored the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which meted out the same mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years with no probation and parole, to someone possessing as little as five grams of crack as one possessing 500 grams of powder cocaine - legislation that somehow exempted his son Hunter. Even as the CIA spook President George H.W. Bush was ramping up the Drug War in 1989, Biden criticized this as not enough: "Quite frankly, the President's plans are not tough enough, bold enough, or imaginative enough to meet the crisis at hand." 

   Biden lamented that only four people on average were given the death penalty for drug offenses, and bragged about passing the "first federal death penalty" in 1972. Biden introduced the National Drug Control Strategy Act in 1990, which would have created "military-style boot camp prisons" for people arrested for drug-related offenses. This prepared for the Biden-Thurmond Violent Crime Control Act of 1991, which would have increased the maximum sentence for 44 offenses to include the death penalty. In the debate about the bill, Biden called for increasing the number to 51. Introducing his namesake crime bill to the Senate on 18 November 1993, Biden boasted: "Every major crime bill since 1976; every minor crime bill; has had the name of the Democratic Senator from the State of Delaware, Joe Biden." He warned of "predators on our streets" who were "beyond the pale": "Many of those people literally have not been socialized. It doesn't matter whether or not they're the victims of society." 

   The ominous meaning of "socialized" received its full expression in his co-sponsoring the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995, combining his "tough on crime" crusade with an aggressive push towards the surveillance state. The Patriot Act was an amended version of Biden's bill and he took credit for having passed "almost the same thing". After a Senate meeting on terrorism in 1996, Biden told C-SPAN: "Hell, we've got crime bills coming out our ears." Speaking about rave club owners in 2001, Biden demanded: "Increase penalties. Put the son of a gun in jail!" Even though he is now slyly backtracking for political expediency - which doesn't matter since its effects have already been long-felt and normalized in the culture - Biden admitted during his 2008 presidential campaign: "I knew more people would be locked up across the board." Across the board clearly means many who were non-violent and even innocent; his record has been a consistent one of dismissing people to statistics and "means" that justify his Police State ends. In a stunning 2016 interview, Biden boasted about his crime bills - "We had enormous success" - and blamed "institutional racism" instead for all the social effects. Such abstract narratives enable the legislation actually responsible.

   Cop-mala Harris and the Police State. As San Francisco prosecutor from 2004 to 2011, Harris built a reputation implementing the same type of draconian crime laws Biden was sponsoring in the U.S. Senate. In 2004, she opposed a state initiative to ease minimum mandatory sentencing laws, further opposing sentence reform measures in 2012 and 2014. She began prosecuting parents of habitually truant students, even sending public school parents threatening letters, including a $2,000 fine or prison sentence. (Truancy in California includes "having three unexcused absences or being late to school by 30 minutes three times in one school year.") In 2010, Harris opposed Proposition 19 that would have legalized marijuana in California (it wasn't legalized until 2016). She oversaw the city's crime lab which violated defendants' rights by hiding evidence that technician Deborah Madden purposely sabotaged the drug results of multiple cases, skimming cocaine for herself and mishandling evidence. Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo ruled that Harris' office purposely hid Madden's recent conviction from defense lawyers, calling into question the convictions of nearly forty defendants; it has since led to more than 600 drug-related cases getting tossed out. Harris also challenged the release of Daniel Larsen, even after it was revealed he was innocent and nine witnesses were not called to testify for him. She admitted his innocence but worked to keep him imprisoned on the grounds he failed to present proof quick enough; his conviction was overturned only by the help of the Innocence Project in 2009.

   She continued her appalling judicial overreach throughout her career as California Attorney General from 2011 to 2017. During her tenure, at least 1,560 people were thrown in prison for marijuana-related offenses, according to data from the Washington Free Beacon. She laughed when confronted about them, even being condemned as a "disgrace" for a marijuana joke against her Jamaican heritage. Harris aggressively ensured that non-violent second-strike offenders were not paroled, arguing that California would lose "an important labor pool" and wanted to use them to fight forest fires. In January 2015, Harris appeared before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for her role in using a lying jail informant and covering for a prosecutor who perjured in a trial against Johnny Baca. She fought to keep him convicted even after the misconduct was uncovered, and the prosecutor revealed to hide evidence from the defense. Two months later, she protected Kern County prosecutor Robert Murray, who was caught falsifying a confession transcript to secure a life-term conviction. As with the Baca case, the conviction was overturned only against Harris' draconian efforts. Like Biden, she backed civil asset forfeiture - the State's blatant theft of property without a conviction. She refused to endorse a 2015 bill calling for a special prosecutor to investigate deadly police shootings, contrary to her BLM pandering.

   This reveals a consistent pattern of Kamala Harris being an authoritarian, a draconian Police State crusader no matter how much she claims to be a "criminal justice reform" candidate. She railroaded at least five innocent people during her career, refusing a DNA test that could potentially release a man on death row. The MSM and "Entertainment" elites have idolized her, leaving it for Tulsi Gabbard to call her out. All who support Biden/Harris are endorsing their records, whether one knows it or not. The Conservatives miss half the story when they take Harris at her face value as a "radical", as she is a Police State psychopath who supports the rioters as weaponized pawns whose proposals will merely enlarge that State's scope in some directions rather than others. The broader picture can be seen in the fact that gun control was also enshrined in Biden's bipartisan 1994 crime bill. Biden and Harris have infringed on individual gun rights, even while maintaining their private security and pursuing policies arming the law boys to implement their own favored projects, such as anyone violating their proposed national mask mandate. The central problem is their authoritarianism and the expanding definition of "crime" itself; what is needed will be to think outside the dialectic. 

   A Lifetime of Lies and Cronyism. Biden has built his career upon a sandstorm of lies, held up only by the Establishment's running cover for him. This is even though he admitted plagiarizing in law school and has continuously been caught plagiarizing speeches. His embellishments included his claims to have "ended genocide" in Bosnia. The ongoing Hunter Biden emails are uncovering a pattern of Joe Biden using his position as Obama's Vice President to benefit his family's business dealings in such places as Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and China. Just one incident includes activities on behalf of a firm with close ties to Chinese intelligence. Its no coincidence the same Big Tech that has suppressed those who bring up those incriminating emails, has been exposed hiring Chinese government-linked censors as part of their Orwellian "Hate-Speech Engineering" team. The hypocrite Biden can cry crocodile tears about "kids in cages" even while those cages were built under the Obama Administration. This is a consistent pattern of speaking with a forked tongue while doing entirely different things; and a record of cronyism that would form the hallmark of his foreign policy.

   True Forces Behind a Biden Foreign Policy. Even after praising Biden, Robert Gates, the former Defense Secretary under Obama, issued a scathing critique of his foreign policy: "I think he's been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades." We may accept or reject the view of a former CIA director, but one thing is very apparent: Biden being such a foreign policy novice, with his record of rubber-stamping all wars and adventures put before him, would make him very susceptible to certain domestic and foreign forces directing his policies. Harris is also an admitted interventionist with a "global vision". Some things are inevitable - the Overton Window has certainly shifted on Afghanistan whether Trump or Biden will be re-elected. But other potential trade deals and foreign adventures warrant a closer scrutiny at his foreign policy team. 

   "Many of the people who work closely with Biden are enmeshed in the opaque world of strategic consultancies and by extension a network of the world’s biggest businesses," writes Jonathan Guyer for The American Prospect. We can certainly expect business as usual when it comes to Israel, Biden having signed off on the wars fought for AIPAC and the Neocons. He had proposed the break-up of Iraq into three states, as per the Oded Yinon Plan that wants to scramble the Middle East map. Biden's likely defense secretary, Michèle Flournoy, defines her purpose as "building bridges between Silicon Valley and the U.S. government." Her vision seems eerily similar to the merger of private and public as proposed by the Communitarian Agenda 2030, with the Biden/Big Tech links documented throughout. Flournoy is founding partner of a consulting firm called WestExec Advisors with former Biden speechwriter Tony Blinken, who "never cashed in on his international connections, years of face time with Saudi, Israeli, and Chinese leaders." 

   That opportunity would likely come with a Biden/Harris Administration, which would clearly give favored status to WestExec Advisors' various clients: "The Prospect can confirm that one of those clients is the Israeli artificial-intelligence company Windward. With surveillance software that tracks ships in real time, two former Israeli naval intelligence officers established the company in 2010. Gabi Ashkenazi, former chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, serves on its board. Windward also claims former CIA director David Petraeus as an investor, as well as a Hong Kong billionaire (most U.S. military-tech companies avoid money from China, experts told me, so they turn to investing in Israel)." Thus, we see the same link-up of Israeli military intelligence, former CIA spooks, and Chinese Communist oligarchs that I documented in my "Covid and the Global Surveillance State" series. This makes one ponder about the true intent behind Biden's aggressive use of the Rona for his campaign.

   My Problems with Trump. While the above information has been more than enough for me to reject and actively oppose a Biden/Harris election victory, I have serious issues with Trump that prevent me from becoming a MAGA red-hat wearing partisan. That includes the treacherous circle that surrounds him and has his ears. His advisor and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, with his links to Chabad - a fanatical religious cult with deep oligarch pockets and political links around the world. Biden has also pandered to Chabad, so I can expect business as usual either way - but certainly I won't hold my breath that a second Trump term would either rein in Kushner or prosecute the Biden Crime Family, just as he never "locked up" Hillary or truly gone against the deep pockets of the Clinton Foundation. While Trump may rein in on Communist China, he has rehabilitated that longtime svengali Henry Kissinger who, like WestExec, represents his own Big Business links and he is the man who presided over both the rapprochement to Communist China and the treacherous Israel-United States Binational Industrial Research and Development (BIRD) Foundation. On the other hand, Biden and Harris would be more directly linked to the Chinese government. The joint Israeli-Chinese theft of American technology and infiltration of hi-tech firms will continue whether the White House deals directly with China or indirectly through Israel.

   Nor is Trump a savior against Globalist Big Pharma. As documented by Derrick Broze, his Administration's defunding of the World Health Organization (WHO) simply means that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will overtake the U.S. government as its main funder. There will be even less oversight over that corrupt organization. In February 2020, the Trump Administration through the CIA-linked USAID pledged $1.16 billion between 2020 and 2023 to Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance, founded and funded by the Gates Foundation. This was confirmed by both Gavi and the US State Department. That Gavi is another leading funder of the WHO simply means the government's aid that was going directly to the WHO, would simply be funneled through it. In May, US Ambassador to the UN, Kelly Craft, who has identified "fighting anti-Israel bias" as her primary effort at the UN, participated in an event funded by Gates, Soros and assorted other Globalists, pledging yet more millions of tax-payer dollars to Gavi. On 4 June, Trump himself issued a video endorsement of Gavi at its virtual Global Vaccine Summit in the UK. It no longer matters if the public is privatized or the private is nationalized - the objective will be the same under communitarian Globalism. 

   It allows some trappings of national sovereignty here and there, but the underlying system will be the same. Trump has done some positive things, such as reversing the TPP and many other trade deals; reining in on the intersectional cult that was subverting federal agencies; and foremost, the most non-interventionist president in recent history. Make America Great Again should be as much about not enforcing peace deals for Israel as it is about not fighting wars for it either - Israel can make its own deals, and America should finally put its own interests first which should start with cutting off the aid spigot and ending their subversion of American institutions. Nor should an American withdrawal simply enable the three "multipolar" powers waiting to replace it with their own imperialism. I will remain vigilant and continue to expose the agenda that remains the same, no matter whom makes it into the White House. And finally, the "Libertarian" Party is a joke of a third-party. Just as they curried favor with disaffected Republicans in the 2012 and 2016 elections, so too is it now currying favor with authoritarian Leftists as seen in Jo Jorgenson's endorsement of a Marxist movement. It is both ignorant and anti-libertarian, an ill-fated alignment with authoritarians who demand absolute allegiance to their Statism at all levels. I will proudly close this election cycle upon principles.